arXiv subjects

Zhuang Qiang Bok

Publications and source records attributed to Zhuang Qiang Bok.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Knowledge or Calculator? Decomposing the Skill Premium in Verifiable Financial Agent Workflows

Financial AI agents must do more than retrieve facts: investment workflows require correct quantitative execution, reliable use of procedural resources, and auditable structured outputs. We introduce FinSkillBench, an evaluation suite of 2,603 point in time episodes across 12 subtasks in portfolio construction, risk management, and fundamental analysis, with hidden regenerable ground truth and task specific deterministic verifiers. Executing 17,820 episodes across 9 models and 3 resource conditions, the paired analysis across 8 models shows that curated skill packages raise mean scores by +16.2 points (0.366 to 0.528), whereas skills generated within a single episode add only +0.5 points while consuming more tokens and turns. We then decompose the curated premium by granting human authored procedural documents and executable domain tools separately: documents alone add +5.6 points, tools alone add +19.5 points, and their combination is subadditive. The premium is strongly workflow dependent: executable tools dominate numerically intensive workflows, documentation matters more when procedural or output schema guidance is the bottleneck, and interpretive tasks benefit from both. The effects are sign stable across 10 scoring variants and cluster bootstrap analyses, and an independently implemented second harness reproduces the directional pattern while showing that effect magnitudes depend on how tools and data are exposed. Overall, a measured "skill premium" is a property of the full model, resource, and harness system rather than of the underlying model alone.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

FinSkillBench: Evaluating AI Agents and Domain Skills for Investment Management

Investment management is a high-stakes domain in which agentic AI systems must do more than generate plausible text. They must retrieve point-in-time data, assemble correct computational inputs, invoke specialized methods, and produce auditable structured outputs. We introduce FinSkillBench, an evaluation suite designed to measure whether language model agents can effectively use financial domain skills to solve investment management tasks. The benchmark spans three domains, portfolio construction, risk management, and fundamental analysis, and includes 12 subtasks with 2,603 task episodes. Each episode provides point-in-time inputs, hidden ground truth, and a task-specific verifier.We compare three conditions: no skill, curated skill packages consisting of procedural documents and executable components, and self-generated skills in which the agent writes and reuses its own procedures within an episode. Across 9 models and a large-scale evaluation, curated skills consistently improve performance, raising mean scores from 0.366 to 0.528, with the largest gains in portfolio construction and risk management. In contrast, self-generated skills provide little benefit despite higher computational cost. An independent evaluation using a separate agent framework (Hermes Agent, 8 models, 5,280 episodes total) reproduces the directional pattern across all three domains, with the magnitude of skill effects varying by subtask and harness. These results showthat in investment management agents, access to reliable procedural skills can be as important as model choice, while naive self-generation of skills is often ineffective. We release the benchmark, evaluation tools, curated skill packages, and full trajectories to support further research.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Reasoning Beyond the Obvious: Evaluating Divergent and Convergent Thinking in LLMs for Financial Scenarios

Most reasoning benchmarks for LLMs emphasize factual accuracy or step-by-step logic. In finance, however, professionals must not only converge on optimal decisions but also generate creative, plausible futures under uncertainty. We introduce ConDiFi, a benchmark that jointly evaluates divergent and convergent thinking in LLMs for financial tasks. ConDiFi features 607 macro-financial prompts for divergent reasoning and 990 multi-hop adversarial MCQs for convergent reasoning. Using this benchmark, we evaluated 14 leading models and uncovered striking differences. Despite high fluency, GPT-4o underperforms on Novelty and Actionability. In contrast, models like DeepSeek-R1 and Cohere Command R+ rank among the top for generating actionable, insights suitable for investment decisions. ConDiFi provides a new perspective to assess reasoning capabilities essential to safe and strategic deployment of LLMs in finance.

cs.AI↗