arXiv subjects

Zhuolun Xiang

Publications and source records attributed to Zhuolun Xiang.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Prefix Consensus For Censorship Resistant BFT

Despite broad adoption of BFT consensus in blockchains, censorship resistance remains weak: existing designs offer limited inclusion guarantees and allow leaders to exclude transactions. We address this with a new abstraction and protocol stack. We define \emph{Prefix Consensus}, where parties input vectors and output two consistent vectors $(v^{\sf low},v^{\sf high})$ that extend the maximum common prefix of honest inputs and satisfy $v_i^{\sf low}\preceq v_j^{\sf high}$ for all honest parties $i,j$. We show that Prefix Consensus is solvable asynchronously and establish tight round-complexity bounds. We then define \emph{Strong Prefix Consensus}, which additionally requires agreement on the high output, and give a leaderless partially synchronous protocol. Using its accountable variant, we build a leaderless, multi-proposer, censorship-resistant BFT SMR protocol with amortized four-round commit latency under synchronized starts, while guaranteeing that after GST at most $f$ slots can be censored. Finally, we connect Prefix Consensus to graded consensus, obtaining a matching lower bound and a 3-round protocol, and derive leaderless Binary Consensus with improved worst-case complexity.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Simple-IT: Practical Low-Latency Signature-Free BFT Consensus

Recent advances in quantum computing pose a looming threat to most current Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols, which rely on quantum-vulnerable public-key signature schemes such as Ed25519 and BLS12-381. Instead of switching to much more expensive post-quantum secure signature schemes, an alternative is to use signature-free protocols, which rely only on cheap, post-quantum secure authenticated channels. In this paper, we ask whether signature-free BFT consensus protocols can match the performance of current state-of-the-art, quantum-vulnerable BFT consensus protocols. While previous work on the Sailfish++ protocol showed that state-of-the-art throughput is attainable signature-free, the question of latency is still open. Several recent signature-free protocols have low latency in theory, but they are all very intricate, and no practical implementation has so far been presented. In this work, we propose Simple-IT, a new leader-based, signature-free BFT consensus protocol that achieves a theoretical latency of 4 message delays (one more than the optimum), and only 3 on its optimistic path. Crucially, Simple-IT is simple enough to be amenable to implementation and to practical optimizations such as speculative pipelining, and, as we show experimentally in a geo-distributed testbed, it achieves both throughput and latency competitive with state-of-the-art quantum-vulnerable protocols.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

The Latency Price of Threshold Cryptosystem in Blockchains

Threshold cryptography is essential for many blockchain protocols. For example, many protocols rely on threshold common coin to implement asynchronous consensus, leader elections, and provide support for randomized applications. Similarly, threshold decryption and threshold time-lock puzzles are often necessary for privacy. In this paper, we study the interplay between threshold cryptography and a class of blockchains that use Byzantine-fault tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols with a focus on latency. More specifically, we focus on blockchain-native threshold cryptosystem, where the blockchain validators seek to run a threshold cryptographic protocol once for every block with the block contents as an input to the threshold cryptographic protocol. All existing approaches for blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems introduce a latency overhead of at least one message delay for running the threshold cryptographic protocol. In this paper, we first propose a mechanism to eliminate this overhead for blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems with tight thresholds, i.e., in threshold cryptographic protocols where the secrecy and reconstruction thresholds are the same. However, many real-world proof-of-stake-based blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems rely on ramp thresholds, where reconstruction thresholds are strictly greater than secrecy thresholds. For these blockchains, we formally demonstrate that the additional delay is unavoidable. We then introduce a mechanism to minimize this delay in the optimistic case. We implement our optimistic protocol for the proof-of-stake distributed randomness scheme on the Aptos blockchain. Our measurements from the Aptos mainnet show that the optimistic approach reduces latency overhead by 71%.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Raptr: Prefix Consensus for Robust High-Performance BFT

In this paper, we present Raptr--a Byzantine fault-tolerant state machine replication (BFT SMR) protocol that combines strong robustness with high throughput, while attaining near-optimal theoretical latency. Raptr delivers exceptionally low latency and high throughput under favorable conditions, and it degrades gracefully in the presence of Byzantine faults and network attacks. Existing high-throughput BFT SMR protocols typically take either pessimistic or optimistic approaches to data dissemination: the former suffers from suboptimal latency in favorable conditions, while the latter deteriorates sharply under minimal attacks or network instability. Raptr bridges this gap, combining the strengths of both approaches through a novel Prefix Consensus mechanism. We implement Raptr and evaluate it against several state-of-the-art protocols in a geo-distributed environment with 100 replicas. Raptr achieves 260,000 transactions per second (TPS) with sub-second latency under favorable conditions, sustaining 610ms at 10,000 TPS and 755ms at 250,000 TPS. It remains robust under network glitches, showing minimal performance degradation even with a 1% message drop rate.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Zaptos: Towards Optimal Blockchain Latency

End-to-end blockchain latency has become a critical topic of interest in both academia and industry. However, while modern blockchain systems process transactions through multiple stages, most research has primarily focused on optimizing the latency of the Byzantine Fault Tolerance consensus component. In this work, we identify key sources of latency in blockchain systems and introduce Zaptos, a parallel pipelined architecture designed to minimize end-to-end latency while maintaining the high-throughput of pipelined blockchains. We implemented Zaptos and evaluated it against the pipelined architecture of the Aptos blockchain in a geo-distributed environment. Our evaluation demonstrates a 25\% latency reduction under low load and over 40\% reduction under high load. Notably, Zaptos achieves a throughput of 20,000 transactions per second with sub-second latency, surpassing previously reported blockchain throughput, with sub-second latency, by an order of magnitude.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Jolteon and Ditto: Network-Adaptive Efficient Consensus with Asynchronous Fallback

Existing committee-based Byzantine state machine replication (SMR) protocols, typically deployed in production blockchains, face a clear trade-off: (1) they either achieve linear communication cost in the happy path, but sacrifice liveness during periods of asynchrony, or (2) they are robust (progress with probability one) but pay quadratic communication cost. We believe this trade-off is unwarranted since existing linear protocols still have asymptotic quadratic cost in the worst case. We design Ditto, a Byzantine SMR protocol that enjoys the best of both worlds: optimal communication on and off the happy path (linear and quadratic, respectively) and progress guarantee under asynchrony and DDoS attacks. We achieve this by replacing the view-synchronization of partially synchronous protocols with an asynchronous fallback mechanism at no extra asymptotic cost. Specifically, we start from HotStuff, a state-of-the-art linear protocol, and gradually build Ditto. As a separate contribution and an intermediate step, we design a 2-chain version of HotStuff, Jolteon, which leverages a quadratic view-change mechanism to reduce the latency of the standard 3-chain HotStuff. We implement and experimentally evaluate all our systems. Notably, Jolteon's commit latency outperforms HotStuff by 200-300ms with varying system size. Additionally, Ditto adapts to the network and provides better performance than Jolteon under faulty conditions and better performance than VABA (a state-of-the-art asynchronous protocol) under faultless conditions. This proves our case that breaking the robustness-efficiency trade-off is in the realm of practicality.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Deferred Objects to Enhance Smart Contract Programming with Optimistic Parallel Execution

One of the main bottlenecks of blockchains is smart contract execution. To increase throughput, modern blockchains try to execute transactions in parallel. Unfortunately, however, common blockchain use cases introduce read-write conflicts between transactions, forcing sequentiality. We propose RapidLane, an extension for parallel execution engines that allows the engine to capture computations in conflicting parts of transactions and defer their execution until a later time, sometimes optimistically predicting execution results. This technique, coupled with support for a new construct for smart contract languages, allows one to turn certain sequential workloads into parallelizable ones. We integrated RapidLane into Block-STM, a state-of-the-art parallel execution engine used by several blockchains in production, and deployed it on the Aptos blockchain. Our evaluation shows that on commonly contended workloads, such as peer-to-peer transfers with a single fee payer and NFT minting, RapidLane yields up to $12\times$ more throughput.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2022

Block-STM: Scaling Blockchain Execution by Turning Ordering Curse to a Performance Blessing

Block-STM is a parallel execution engine for smart contracts, built around the principles of Software Transactional Memory. Transactions are grouped in blocks, and every execution of the block must yield the same deterministic outcome. Block-STM further enforces that the outcome is consistent with executing transactions according to a preset order, leveraging this order to dynamically detect dependencies and avoid conflicts during speculative transaction execution. At the core of Block-STM is a novel, low-overhead collaborative scheduler of execution and validation tasks. Block-STM is implemented on the main branch of the Diem Blockchain code-base and runs in production at Aptos. Our evaluation demonstrates that Block-STM is adaptive to workloads with different conflict rates and utilizes the inherent parallelism therein. Block-STM achieves up to $110k$ tps in the Diem benchmarks and up to $170k$ tps in the Aptos Benchmarks, which is a $20$x and $17$x improvement over the sequential baseline with $32$ threads, respectively. The throughput on a contended workload is up to $50k$ tps and $80k$ tps in Diem and Aptos benchmarks, respectively.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2022

Brief Note: Fast Authenticated Byzantine Consensus

Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) state machine replication (SMR) has been studied for over 30 years. Recently it has received more attention due to its application in permissioned blockchain systems. A sequence of research efforts focuses on improving the commit latency of the SMR protocol in the common good case, including PBFT with $3$-round latency and $n\geq 3f+1$ and FaB with $2$-round latency and $n\geq 5f+1$. In this paper, we propose an authenticated protocol that solves $2$-round BFT SMR with only $n\geq 5f-1$ replicas, which refutes the optimal resiliency claim made in FaB for needing $n \geq 5f+1$ for $2$-round PBFT-style BFT protocols. For the special case when $f=1$, our protocol needs only $4$ replicas, and strictly improves PBFT by reducing the latency by one round (even when one backup is faulty).

cs.DC↗

arXiv2022

Good-case Latency of Byzantine Broadcast: A Complete Categorization

This paper explores the problem good-case latency of Byzantine fault-tolerant broadcast, motivated by the real-world latency and performance of practical state machine replication protocols. The good-case latency measures the time it takes for all non-faulty parties to commit when the designated broadcaster is non-faulty. We provide a complete characterization of tight bounds on good-case latency, in the authenticated setting under synchrony, partial synchrony and asynchrony. Some of our new results may be surprising, e.g., 2-round PBFT-style partially synchronous Byzantine broadcast is possible if and only if $n\geq 5f-1$, and a tight bound for good-case latency under $n/3<f<n/2$ under synchrony is not an integer multiple of the delay bound.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Good-case and Bad-case Latency of Unauthenticated Byzantine Broadcast: A Complete Categorization

This paper studies the {\em good-case latency} of {\em unauthenticated} Byzantine fault-tolerant broadcast, which measures the time it takes for all non-faulty parties to commit given a non-faulty broadcaster. For both asynchrony and synchrony, we show that $n\geq 4f$ is the tight resilience threshold that separates good-case 2 rounds and 3 rounds. For asynchronous Byzantine reliable broadcast (BRB), we also investigate the {\em bad-case latency} for all non-faulty parties to commit when the broadcaster is faulty but some non-faulty party commits. We provide matching upper and lower bounds on the resilience threshold of bad-case latency for BRB protocols with optimal good-case latency of 2 rounds. In particular, we show 2 impossibility results and propose 4 asynchronous BRB protocols.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Be Prepared When Network Goes Bad: An Asynchronous View-Change Protocol

The popularity of permissioned blockchain systems demands BFT SMR protocols that are efficient under good network conditions (synchrony) and robust under bad network conditions (asynchrony). The state-of-the-art partially synchronous BFT SMR protocols provide optimal linear communication cost per decision under synchrony and good leaders, but lose liveness under asynchrony. On the other hand, the state-of-the-art asynchronous BFT SMR protocols are live even under asynchrony, but always pay quadratic cost even under synchrony. In this paper, we propose a BFT SMR protocol that achieves the best of both worlds -- optimal linear cost per decision under good networks and leaders, optimal quadratic cost per decision under bad networks, and remains always live.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Strengthened Fault Tolerance in Byzantine Fault Tolerant Replication

Byzantine fault tolerant (BFT) state machine replication (SMR) is an important building block for constructing permissioned blockchain systems. In contrast to Nakamoto Consensus where any block obtains higher assurance as buried deeper in the blockchain, in BFT SMR, any committed block is secure has a fixed resilience threshold. In this paper, we investigate strengthened fault tolerance (SFT) in BFT SMR under partial synchrony, which provides gradually increased resilience guarantees (like Nakamoto Consensus) during an optimistic period when the network is synchronous and the number of Byzantine faults is small. Moreover, the committed blocks can tolerate more than one-third (up to two-thirds) corruptions even after the optimistic period. Compared to the prior best solution Flexible BFT which requires quadratic message complexity, our solution maintains the linear message complexity of state-of-the-art BFT SMR protocols and requires only marginal bookkeeping overhead. We implement our solution over the open-source Diem project, and give experimental results that demonstrate its efficiency under real-world scenarios.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2020

Byzantine Agreement, Broadcast and State Machine Replication with Near-optimal Good-case Latency

This paper investigates the problem \textit{good-case latency} of Byzantine agreement, broadcast and state machine replication in the synchronous authenticated setting. The good-case latency measure captures the time it takes to reach agreement when all non-faulty parties have the same input (or in BB/SMR when the sender/leader is non-faulty). Previous result implies a lower bound showing that any Byzantine agreement or broadcast protocol tolerating more than $n/3$ faults must have a good-case latency of at least $Δ$, where $Δ$ is the assumed maximum message delay bound. Our first result is a family of protocols we call $1Δ$ that have near-optimal good-case latency. We propose a protocol $1Δ$-BA that solves Byzantine agreement in the synchronous and authenticated setting with near-optimal good-case latency of $Δ+2δ$ and optimal resilience $f<n/2$, where $δ$ is the actual (unknown) delay bound. We then extend our protocol and present $1Δ$-BB and $1Δ$-SMR for Byzantine fault tolerant broadcast and state machine replication, respectively, in the same setting and with the same good-case latency of $Δ+2δ$ and $f<n/2$ fault tolerance. Our $1Δ$-SMR upper bound improves the gap between the best current solution, Sync HotStuff, which obtains a good-case latency of $2Δ$ per command and the lower bound of $Δ$ on good-case latency. Finally, we investigate weaker notions of the synchronous setting and show how to adopt the $1Δ$ approach to these models.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2020

Improved Extension Protocols for Byzantine Broadcast and Agreement

Byzantine broadcast (BB) and Byzantine agreement (BA) are two most fundamental problems and essential building blocks in distributed computing, and improving their efficiency is of interest to both theoreticians and practitioners. In this paper, we study extension protocols of BB and BA, i.e., protocols that solve BB/BA with long inputs of $l$ bits using lower costs than $l$ single-bit instances. We present new protocols with improved communication complexity in almost all settings: authenticated BA/BB with $t<n/2$, authenticated BB with $t<(1-ε)n$, unauthenticated BA/BB with $t<n/3$, and asynchronous reliable broadcast and BA with $t<n/3$. The new protocols are advantageous and significant in several aspects. First, they achieve the best-possible communication complexity of $Θ(nl)$ for wider ranges of input sizes compared to prior results. Second, the authenticated extension protocols achieve optimal communication complexity given the current best available BB/BA protocols for short messages. Third, to the best of our knowledge, our asynchronous and authenticated protocols in the setting are the first extension protocols in that setting.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2020

Linear and Range Counting under Metric-based Local Differential Privacy

Local differential privacy (LDP) enables private data sharing and analytics without the need for a trusted data collector. Error-optimal primitives (for, e.g., estimating means and item frequencies) under LDP have been well studied. For analytical tasks such as range queries, however, the best known error bound is dependent on the domain size of private data, which is potentially prohibitive. This deficiency is inherent as LDP protects the same level of indistinguishability between any pair of private data values for each data downer. In this paper, we utilize an extension of $ε$-LDP called Metric-LDP or $E$-LDP, where a metric $E$ defines heterogeneous privacy guarantees for different pairs of private data values and thus provides a more flexible knob than $ε$ does to relax LDP and tune utility-privacy trade-offs. We show that, under such privacy relaxations, for analytical workloads such as linear counting, multi-dimensional range counting queries, and quantile queries, we can achieve significant gains in utility. In particular, for range queries under $E$-LDP where the metric $E$ is the $L^1$-distance function scaled by $ε$, we design mechanisms with errors independent on the domain sizes; instead, their errors depend on the metric $E$, which specifies in what granularity the private data is protected. We believe that the primitives we design for $E$-LDP will be useful in developing mechanisms for other analytical tasks, and encourage the adoption of LDP in practice.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2019

Partially Replicated Causally Consistent Shared Memory: Lower Bounds and An Algorithm

The focus of this paper is on causal consistency in a {\em partially replicated} distributed shared memory (DSM) system that provides the abstraction of shared read/write registers. Maintaining causal consistency in distributed shared memory systems has received significant attention in the past, mostly on {\em full replication} wherein each replica stores a copy of all the registers in the shared memory. To ensure causal consistency, all causally preceding updates must be performed before an update is performed at any given replica. Therefore, some mechanism for tracking causal dependencies is required, such as vector timestamps with the number of vector elements being equal to the number of replicas in the context of full replication. In this paper, we investigate causal consistency in {\em partially replicated systems}, wherein each replica may store only a subset of the shared registers. Building on the past work, this paper makes three key contributions: 1. We present a necessary condition on the metadata (which we refer as a {\em timestamp}) that must be maintained by each replica to be able to track causality accurately. The necessary condition identifies a set of directed edges in a {\em share graph} that a replica's timestamp must keep track of. 2. We present an algorithm for achieving causal consistency using a timestamp that matches the above necessary condition, thus showing that the condition is necessary and sufficient. 3. We define a measurement of timestamp space size and present a lower bound (in bits) on the size of the timestamps. The lower bound matches our algorithm in several special cases.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2019

Global Stabilization for Causally Consistent Partial Replication

Causally consistent distributed storage systems have received significant attention recently due to the potential for providing high throughput and causality guarantees. {\em Global stabilization} is a technique established for achieving causal consistency in distributed multi-version key-value store systems, adopted by the previous work such as GentleRain \cite{Du2014GentleRainCA} and Cure \cite{akkoorath2016cure}. Intuitively, this approach serializes all updates by their physical time and computes the ``Global Stable Time'' which is a time point $t$ such that versions with timestamp $\leq t$ can be returned to the client without violating causality. However, all previous designs with global stabilization assume {\em full replication}, where each data center stores a full copy of data, and each client is restricted to access servers within one data center. In this paper, we propose a theoretical framework to support {\em general partial replication} with causal consistency via global stabilization, where each server can store an arbitrary subset of the data, and each client is allowed to communicate with any subset of the servers and migrate among them without extra delays. We propose an algorithm that implements causal consistency for distributed multi-version key-value stores with general partially replication. We prove the optimality of the Global Stable Time computation in our algorithm regarding the remote update visibility latency, i.e. how fast update from a remote server is visible to the client, under general partial replication. We also provide trade-offs to further optimize the remote update visibility by introducing extra delays during client's migration. Simulation results on the performance of our algorithm compared to the previous work are also provided.

cs.DC↗