arXiv subjects

Zhuozhao Zhan

Publications and source records attributed to Zhuozhao Zhan.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Joint modeling with time-dependent treatment and heteroskedasticity: Bayesian analysis with application to the Framingham Heart Study

Medical studies for chronic disease are often interested in the relation between longitudinal risk factor profiles and individuals' later life disease outcomes. These profiles may typically be subject to intermediate structural changes due to treatment or environmental influences. Analysis of such studies may be handled by the joint model framework. However, current joint modeling does not consider structural changes in the residual variability of the risk profile nor consider the influence of subject-specific residual variability on the time-to-event outcome. In the present paper, we extend the joint model framework to address these two heterogeneous intra-individual variabilities. A Bayesian approach is used to estimate the unknown parameters and simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the method. The proposed joint model is applied to the Framingham Heart Study to investigate the influence of anti-hypertensive medication on the systolic blood pressure variability together with its effect on the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. We show that anti-hypertensive medication is associated with elevated systolic blood pressure variability and increased variability elevates risk of developing cardiovascular disease.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2022

Individual causal effects from observational longitudinal studies with time-varying exposures

Causal effects may vary among individuals and can even be of opposite signs. When significant effect heterogeneity exists, the population average causal effect might be uninformative for an individual. Due to the fundamental problem of causality, individual causal effects (ICEs) cannot be retrieved from cross-sectional data. However, in crossover studies, it is accepted that ICEs can be estimated under the assumptions of no carryover effects and time invariance of potential outcomes. A generic potential-outcome formulation with appropriate statistical assumptions to identify ICEs is lacking for other longitudinal data with time-varying exposures. We present a general framework for causal effect heterogeneity in which individual-specific effect modification is parameterized with a latent variable, the receptiveness factor. If the exposure varies over time, then the repeated measurements contain information on an individual's level of this receptiveness factor. Therefore, we study the conditional distribution of the ICE given all an individual's factual information. This novel conditional random variable is called the cross-world causal effect (CWCE). For known causal structures and time-varying exposures, the variability of the CWCE reduces with an increasing number of repeated measurements. The CWCE becomes identifiable from observational data under the causal assumption of cross-world similarity of individual-effect modification (i.e. there exists an exposure strategy whose effect is affected by all latent causes). We illustrate the theory with examples in which the cause-effect relations can be parameterized as generalized linear mixed assignments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

Kendall's tau estimator for bivariate zero-inflated count data

In this paper, we extend the work of Pimentel et al. (2015) and propose an adjusted estimator of Kendall's $τ$ for bivariate zero-inflated count data. We provide achievable lower and upper bounds of our proposed estimator and show its relationship with current literature. In addition, we also suggest an estimator of the achievable bounds, thereby helping practitioners interpret the results while working with real data. The performance of the proposed estimator for Kendall's $τ$ is unbiased with smaller mean squared errors compared to the unadjusted estimator of Pimentel et al. (2015). Our results also show that the bound estimator can be used when knowledge of the marginal distributions is lacking.

math.ST↗

arXiv2022

Simulation Models for Aggregated Data Meta-Analysis: Evaluation of Pooling Effect Sizes and Publication Biases

Simulation studies are commonly used to evaluate the performance of newly developed meta-analysis methods. For methodology that is developed for an aggregated data meta-analysis, researchers often resort to simulation of the aggregated data directly, instead of simulating individual participant data from which the aggregated data would be calculated in reality. Clearly, distributional characteristics of the aggregated data statistics may be derived from distributional assumptions of the underlying individual data, but they are often not made explicit in publications. This paper provides the distribution of the aggregated data statistics that were derived from a heteroscedastic mixed effects model for continuous individual data. As a result, we provide a procedure for directly simulating the aggregated data statistics. We also compare our distributional findings with other simulation approaches of aggregated data used in literature by describing their theoretical differences and by conducting a simulation study for three meta-analysis methods: DerSimonian and Laird's pooled estimate and the Trim & Fill and PET-PEESE method for adjustment of publication bias. We demonstrate that the choices of simulation model for aggregated data may have a relevant impact on (the conclusions of) the performance of the meta-analysis method. We recommend the use of multiple aggregated data simulation models for investigation of new methodology to determine sensitivity or otherwise make the individual participant data model explicit that would lead to the distributional choices of the aggregated data statistics used in the simulation.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2020

Copas' method is sensitive to different mechanisms of publication bias

Copas' method corrects a pooled estimate from an aggregated data meta-analysis for publication bias. Its performance has been studied for one particular mechanism of publication bias. We show through simulations that Copas' method is not robust against other realistic mechanisms. This questions the usefulness of Copas' method, since publication bias mechanisms are typically unknown in practice.

stat.AP↗