Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Ziad Sakr

Publications and source records attributed to Ziad Sakr.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Testing the cosmological Poisson equation in a model-independent way

We show how one can test the cosmological Poisson equation by requiring only the validity of three main assumptions: the energy-momentum conservation equations of matter, the equivalence principle, and the cosmological principle. We first point out that one can only measure the combination ${\mathcal M}\equiv Ω_m^{(0)}μ$, where $μ$ quantifies the deviation of the Poisson equation from the standard one and $Ω_m^{(0)}$ is the fraction of matter density at present. Then we employ a recent model-independent forecast for the growth rate $f(z)$ and the expansion rate $E(z)$ to obtain constraints on ${\mathcal M}$ for a survey that approximates a combination of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and Euclid. We conclude that a constant ${\mathcal M}$ can be measured with a relative error $σ_{\mathcal{M}}=4.5\%$, while if ${\mathcal M}$ is arbitrarily varying in redshift, it can be measured only to within $13.4\%$ (1 $σ$ c.l.) at redshift $z=0.9$, and 15-22\% up to $z=1.5$. We also project our constraints on some parametrizations of ${\mathcal M}$ proposed in literature, while still maintaining model-independence for the background expansion, the power spectrum shape, and the non-linear corrections. Generally speaking, as expected, we find much weaker model-independent constraints than found so far for such models. This means that the cosmological Poisson equation remains quite open to various alternative gravity and dark energy models.

astro-ph.CO↗

Investigating the Hubble Tension and $σ_8$ Discrepancy in f(Q) Cosmology

In this study, we incorporated a three-parameter family, of the metric incompatible modification of standard general relativity $f(Q)$ models into the Boltzmann code MGCLASS at both the background and perturbation levels, in order to conduct a Bayesian study employing probes that include the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), weak lensing (WL), alone or its correlation with galaxy clustering (3$\times$2pt) and growth measurements $f σ_8$, for each submodel. Our analysis focused on the impact of the Hubble tension in $H_0$ and the discrepancy in $σ_8$ resulting from the inclusion of our model parameters, namely $M$, $α$ and $β$. We find that none of the sub models, considered alone or combined, were able of alleviating the Hubble tension with only reducing it to 3 $σ$ in the least constraining, highest degree of freedom case while we found that the $σ_8$ discrepancy, already strongly mitigated on WL linear scales, especially when we let all our model's parameters as free, appears again when considering the more constraining 3$\times$2pt probe. Among the parameters considered, we found that $β$, acting in scaling both the gravitational and the Hubble parameter, had the most impact in reducing the discrepancy, with data preferring far from $Λ$CDM alike values, before the combination with $f σ_8$ constrain it back to its general relativity values.

astro-ph.CO↗

Constraining LLTB models with galaxy cluster counts from next generation surveys

The Universe's assumed homogeneity and isotropy is known as the cosmological principle. It is one of the assumptions that lead to the Friedmann-Lema\^ıtre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric and it is a cornerstone of modern cosmology, because the metric plays a crucial role into the determination of the cosmological observables. Thus, it is of paramount importance to question this principle and perform observational tests that may falsify this hypothesis. Here we explore the use of galaxy cluster counts as a probe of a large-scale inhomogeneity, which is a novel approach for the study of inhomogeneous models, and to determine the precision with which future galaxy cluster surveys will be able to test the cosmological principle. We present forecast constraints on the inhomogeneous Lema\^ıtre-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) model with a cosmological constant and cold dark matter, from a combination of simulated data according to a compilation of `Stage-IV' galaxy surveys following a methodology that involves the use of a mass function correction from numerical $N$-body simulations of an LTB cosmology. When considering the \lcdm fiducial model as a baseline for constructing our mock catalogs, we find that our combination of the forthcoming cluster surveys, will improve the constraints on the cosmological principle parameters as well on the FLRW parameters by about $50\%$ with respect to previous similar forecasts performed using geometrical and linear growth of structure probes, with $\pm20\%$ variations depending on the level of knowledge of systematic effects.These results indicate that galaxy cluster abundances are sensitive probes of inhomogeneity, and that next-generation galaxy cluster surveys, will thoroughly test homogeneity at cosmological scales, tightening the constraints on possible violations of the cosmological principle in the framework of $Λ$LTB scenarios. (Abridged)

astro-ph.CO↗

Testing the hypothesis of a matter density discrepancy within LCDM model using multiple probes

We investigate whether the two cosmological discrepancies on the Hubble constant ($H_0$) and the matter fluctuation parameter ($σ_8$) are suggesting and compatible with the existence of an additional one on the matter density. Knowing that the latter effects on observables is degenerate with those coming from $H_0$ and $σ_8$, we combined different probes to break these degeneracies while adopting the agnostic approach of, either relaxing the calibration parameters in each probe, or by only including priors with the condition that they are obtained independently from the discrepant parameters. We also compiled and used a dataset from previous direct measurements of $Ω_{\rm{M}}$ obtained in a model independent way using the Oort technique. We found when combining galaxy cluster counts + cluster gas mass fraction probe + cosmic chronometers + direct $Ω_{\rm{M}}$ + priors from BBN and CMB, that both parameters, $H_0$ and $σ_8$, are consistent with those inferred from local probes, with $σ_8 = 0.745 \pm 0.05$ while $H_0 = 73.8 \pm 3.01$, and that for a value of $Ω_{\rm{M}} = 0.22 \pm 0.01$ at more than 3$σ$ from that determined by the CMB. However discrepancies appeared when we combined SN in addition to CC suggesting either inconsistencies between the SN sample and the other probes or a challenge to our hypothesis, while only a prior on the matter density obtained from the CMB data keeps $σ_8$ within the values usually obtained when adopting the calibration parameters of the low redshift growth of structures probes. We conclude that, either both tensions are compatible with the local inferred low values of matter density at odd with those obtained by CMB, reviving by then an overlooked discrepancy, or that the $Λ$CDM model is facing more difficulties to accommodate simultaneously all the current available observations.(abridged)

astro-ph.CO↗

A trium test on beyond $Λ$CDM triggering parameters

We performed a Bayesian study on three beyond LCDM phenomenological triggering parameters, the growth index $γ$, the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ and the lensing deviation from the GR prediction parameter $Σ$, using the latest cosmological geometric, growth and lensing probes, all in a consistent implementation within the modified gravity cosmological solver code MGCLASS. We find, when we combined all our probes, i.e. the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the baryonic acoustic oscilation (BAO), the growth measurements $fσ_8$ and the 3$\times$2pt joint analysis of weak lensing and galaxy clustering in photometric redshift surveys, assuming flat space, constraints compatible with general relativity and $Λ$CDM for $ω= -1.025\pm0.045$, and $Σ= 0.992\pm0.022$ at the 68\% level, while $γ= 0.633\pm0.044$ is still within $\sim 2 σ$ from the $Λ$CDM value of $γ\sim 0.55$, and that when $Σ$ is considered as constant; while $γ_\ell = -0.025 \pm0.045$ when the lensing parameter is parameterised as function of a lensing index, introduced for the first time in this work, as $Σ(z)=Ω_m(z)^{γ_\ell}$.

astro-ph.CO↗

Untying the growth index to relieve the $σ_8$ discomfort

The matter fluctuation parameter $σ_8$ is, by model construction, degenerate with the growth index $γ$. Here, we study the effect on the cosmological parameter constraints by treating each independently from one another, considering $σ_8$ as a free and non-derived parameter along with a free $γ$. We then try to constrain all parameters using three probes that span from deep to local redshifts, namely the CMB spectrum, the growth measurements from redshift space distortions and the galaxy cluster counts. We also aim to assess the impact of this relaxation on the $σ_8$ tension. We also propose a more sophisticated correction, along with the classical one, that takes into account the impact of cosmology on the growth measurements by adjusting the growth to keep the observed power spectrum invariant with the background evolution. We found that untying the two parameters does not shift the maximum likelihood of either $σ_8$ or $γ$, but rather enables larger bounds with respect to when $σ_8$ is a derived parameter. More precisely, we obtain $σ_8 = 0.809\pm 0.043 $ and $γ= 0.613\pm 0.046$ in agreement with Planck's constraint for the former and compatible with $Λ$CDM for the latter but with bounds wide enough to accommodate both values subject to the tensions. On the other hand, considering a tiered correction yields $σ_8 = 0.734\pm 0.013$ close to the inferred local values albeit with a growth index of $γ= 0.636\pm 0.022$, while allowing for massive neutrinos yielded $σ_8 = 0.756\pm 0.024$, still preferring low values but with looser constraints on $γ$ and a slight preference for $Σm_ν\sim 0.19$. We conclude that untying $σ_8$ and $γ$ helps in relieving the discomfort on the former and that careful analysis should be followed when using data products treated in a model-dependent way.(abridged)

astro-ph.CO↗

Extensions to $Λ$CDM at Intermediate Redshifts to Solve the Tensions ?

Models of dark energy or modified gravity that tries to alleviate the tensions on the Hubble constant ($H_0$) and the matter fluctuation parameter ($σ_8$) are usually parameterized as function of either late or early time cosmic evolution. In this work we rather focus on one that could privilege extensions to $Λ$CDM on intermediate redshifts by mean of a Gaussian-like window function with a free moving centre $a_{Gwin}$ combined with a modified gravity parameter $μ_{Gwin}$ and an extension of the equation of state parameter $ω_{Gwin}$. Using different combinations of the latest available current datasets subject of the discrepancies, such as the cosmic microwave (CMB) background power spectrum, the baryonic acoustic scale (BAO) in galaxy distribution, Weak lensing (WL) shear and galaxy clustering cross correlations and local hubble constant measurements, we investigate whether such model could alleviate each or both $H_0$ and $σ_8$ tensions. We found when combining all probes that the $σ_8$ tension is alleviated while the $H_0$ is reduced with a small preference for a positive $ω_{Gwin}$ without a particular preference for a redshift or a $μ_{Gwin}$ different from its equivalent $Λ$CDM value. However, if we follow another approach and compare the two sets of the probes subject of discrepancy i.e. CMB+BAO vs WL+local $H_0$, we found that the model is able of solving the $σ_8$ discrepancy at the expense of a enlargement of the constraints, while the Hubble constant discrepancy is not that affected due to the fact that the two likelihood contours are stretched in parallel directions. We conclude that modifying $Λ$CDM cosmology at intermediate redshifts within our model, and the constraints from the datasets used in this study, are not likely a viable solution to solve both tensions.

astro-ph.CO↗

Cluster counts III. $Λ$CDM extensions and the cluster tension

In this work, we examine whether further extensions to the $Λ$CDM model could alleviate the $σ_8$ tension. For that, we derive constraints on the parameters subject of the discrepancy, using CMB $C_{\ell}$ combined with cluster counts SZ sample with a free dark energy equation of state parameter while allowing the clusters mass calibration parameter $(1-b)$ to vary. The latter is degenerate with $σ_8$, which translates the discrepancy within $Λ$CDM framework into one between $(1-b) \sim0.6$, corresponding to constraints on $σ_8$ obtained from CMB, and $(1-b)\sim0.8$, the value adopted for the SZ sample calibration. We find that a constant $w$, when left free to vary along with large priors on the matter density ([0.1,1.0]) and Hubble parameters ([30,200]), can reduce the discrepancy to less than 2$σ$ for values far below its fiducial $w$ = -1. However, the latter were not allowed when we additionally combine with other probes like BAO feature angular diameter distance measured in galaxies clustering surveys. We found also, when we allow to vary, in addition to $w$, a modification of the growth rate through the growth index $γ$, that the tension is alleviated, with $(1-b)$ likelihood now centered around the Planck calibration value of $\sim$ 0.8. However, here again, combining with geometrical distance probes restores the discrepancy, with $(1-b)$ preferred value reverting back to the $Λ$CDM one of $\sim$ 0.6. The same situation is observed when introducing, along with $w$ and $γ$, further extensions to $Λ$CDM like massive neutrinos, although the latter allows to reduce the tension to 2$σ$, even when combining with BAO datasets. We conclude that none of these common extensions to $Λ$CDM is able to fix the discrepancy and a misdetermination of the calibration factor is the most preferred explanation... (Abridged)

astro-ph.CO↗

A void in the Hubble tension? The end of the line for the Hubble bubble

The Universe may feature large-scale inhomogeneities beyond the standard paradigm, implying that statistical homogeneity and isotropy may be reached only on much larger scales than the usually assumed $\sim$100 Mpc. This means that we are not necessarily typical observers and that the Copernican principle could be recovered only on super-Hubble scales. Here, we do not assume the validity of the Copernican principle and let Cosmic Microwave Background, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, type Ia supernovae, local $H_0$, cosmic chronometers, Compton y-distortion and kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich observations constrain the geometrical degrees of freedom of the local structure, which we parametrize via the $Λ$LTB model -- basically a non-linear radial perturbation of a FLRW metric. In order to quantify if a non-Copernican structure could explain away the Hubble tension, we pay careful attention to computing the Hubble constant in an inhomogeneous universe, and we adopt model selection via both the Bayes factor and the Akaike information criterion. Our results show that, while the $Λ$LTB model can successfully explain away the $H_0$ tension, it is favored with respect to the $Λ$CDM model only if one solely considers supernovae in the redshift range that is used to fit the Hubble constant, that is, $0.023<z<0.15$. If one considers all the supernova sample, then the $H_0$ tension is not solved and the support for the $Λ$LTB model vanishes. Combined with other data sets, this solution to the Hubble tension barely helps. Finally, we have reconstructed our local spacetime. We have found that data are best fit by a shallow void with $δ_L \approx -0.04$ and $r^{\mathrm{out}}_L \approx 300$ Mpc, which, interestingly, lies on the border of the 95\% credible region relative to the standard model expectation.

astro-ph.CO↗

Can varying the gravitational constant alleviate the tensions ?

Constraints on the cosmological concordance model parameters from observables at different redshifts are usually obtained using the locally measured value of the gravitational constant $G_N$. Here we relax this assumption, by considering $G$ as a free parameter, either constant over the redshift range or dynamical but limited to differ from fiducial value only above a certain redshift. Using CMB data and distance measurements from galaxy clustering BAO feature, we constrain the cosmological parameters, along with $G$, through a MCMC bayesian inference method. Furthermore, we investigate whether the tensions on the matter fluctuation $σ_8$ and Hubble $H_0$ parameter could be alleviated by this new variable. We used different parameterisations spanning from a constant $G$ to a dynamical $G$. In all the cases investigated in this work we found no mechanism that alleviates the tensions when both CMB and BAO data are used with $ξ_{\mathrm{g}} = G / G_N$ constrained to 1.0$\pm0.04$ (resp. $\pm0.01$) in the constant (resp. dynamical) case. Finally, we studied the cosmological consequences of allowing a running of the spectral index, since the later is sensitive to a change in $G$. For the two parameterisations adopted, we found no significant changes to the previous conclusions.

astro-ph.CO↗

Cosmological Constraints on sub-horizon scales modified gravity theories with MGCLASS II

In this paper we introduce a new public Einstein-Boltzmann solver, \texttt{MGCLASS II}, built as a modification to the publicly available \texttt{CLASS} code, that allows to obtain cosmological observables for Modified Gravity theories. It implements several commonly used parameterizations of deviations from General Relativity, computing their impact on the growth of structure as well as on the background evolution of the Universe, together with a subset of available alternative theories, still not completely ruled out by observations. \texttt{MGCLASS II} is built in such a way to be compatible with parameter estimation codes such as \texttt{MontePython} and \texttt{Cobaya}. We exploit this possibility to constrain the parameterizations used by the Planck collaboration, in order to validate the predictions of this new code, and a newly implemented parameterization (z\_flex) which has different features. For the former we find good agreement with the results existing in the literature, while we present original constraints on the parameters of the latter, finding no significant deviation from the standard cosmological model, $Λ$CDM.

astro-ph.CO↗

The Copernican principle in light of the latest cosmological data

We pursue a program to confront observations with inhomogeneous extensions of the FLRW metric. The main idea is to test the Copernican principle rather than assuming it a priori. We consider the $Λ$CDM model endowed with a spherical $Λ$LTB inhomogeneity around us, that is, we assume isotropy and test the hypothesis of homogeneity. We confront the $Λ$LTB model with the latest available data from CMB, BAO, type Ia supernovae, local $H_0$, cosmic chronometers, Compton y-distortion and kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect. We find that these data can constrain tightly this extra inhomogeneity, almost to the cosmic variance level: on scales $\gtrsim 100$ Mpc structures can have a small non-Copernican effective contrast of just $δ_L \sim 0.01$. Furthermore, the constraints on the standard $Λ$CDM parameters are not weakened after marginalizing over the parameters that model the local structure, to which we assign ignorance priors. In other words, dropping the Copernican principle assumption does not imply worse constraints on the cosmological parameters. This positive result confirms that the present and future data can be meaningfully analyzed within the framework of inhomogeneous cosmology.

astro-ph.CO↗

Gravitation And the Universe from large Scale-Structures: The GAUSS mission concept

Today, thanks in particular to the results of the ESA Planck mission, the concordance cosmological model appears to be the most robust to describe the evolution and content of the Universe from its early to late times. It summarizes the evolution of matter, made mainly of dark matter, from the primordial fluctuations generated by inflation around $10^{-30}$ second after the Big-Bang to galaxies and clusters of galaxies, 13.8 billion years later, and the evolution of the expansion of space, with a relative slowdown in the matter-dominated era and, since a few billion years, an acceleration powered by dark energy. But we are far from knowing the pillars of this model which are inflation, dark matter and dark energy. Comprehending these fundamental questions requires a detailed mapping of our observable Universe over the whole of cosmic time. The relic radiation provides the starting point and galaxies draw the cosmic web. JAXA's LiteBIRD mission will map the beginning of our Universe with a crucial test for inflation (its primordial gravity waves), and the ESA Euclid mission will map the most recent half part, crucial for dark energy. The mission concept, described in this White Paper, GAUSS, aims at being a mission to fully map the cosmic web up to the reionization era, linking early and late evolution, to tackle and disentangle the crucial degeneracies persisting after the Euclid era between dark matter and inflation properties, dark energy, structure growth and gravitation at large scale.

astro-ph.CO↗

Cluster counts: calibration issue or new physics?

In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from CMB observations in the $Λ$CDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of $σ_8$ , appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to $Λ$CDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB--clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (BAO and Ly-$α$) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index $γ$ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the $γ$ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond $Λ$CDM with massive neutrinos.

astro-ph.CO↗

Cluster counts. II. Tensions, massive neutrinos, and modified gravity

The $Λ$CDM concordance model is very successful at describing our Universe with high accuracy and few parameters. Despite its successes, a few tensions persist; most notably, the best-fit $Λ$CDM model, as derived from the Planck CMB data, largely overpredicts the abundance of SZ clusters when using their standard mass calibration. Whether this is a sign of an incorrect calibration or the need for new physics remains a matter of debate. Here we examined two simple extensions of the standard model and their ability to release this tension: massive neutrinos and a simple modified gravity model via a non-standard growth index $γ$. We used both the Planck CMB and SZ cluster counts as datasets, with or without local X-ray clusters. In the case of massive neutrinos, the SZ calibration $(1-b)$ is constrained to $0.59^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ (68\%), more than 5$σ$ away from its standard value $\sim0.8$. We found little correlation between $\sum m_ν$ and $(1-b)$, corroborating previous conclusions derived from X-ray clusters; massive neutrinos do not alleviate the cluster-CMB tension. With our simple $γ$ model, we found a large correlation between calibration and growth index but contrary to local X-ray clusters, SZ clusters are able to break the degeneracy between the two thanks to their extended $z$ range. The calibration $(1-b)$ was then constrained to $0.60^{+0.05}_{-0.07}$, leading to an interesting constraint on $γ=0.60\pm 0.13$. When both massive neutrinos and modified gravity were allowed, preferred values remained centred on standard $Λ$CDM values, but $(1-b)\sim0.8$ was allowed (though only at the $2σ$ level) provided $\sum m_ν\sim0.34 $ eV and $γ\sim0.8$. We conclude that massive neutrinos do not relieve the cluster-CMB tension and that a calibration close to the standard value $0.8$ would call for new physics in the gravitational sector.

astro-ph.CO↗

Cluster Counts Tension : a Sign of Primordial Non-Gaussianity ?

Evolution and abundance of the large-scale structures we observe today, such as clusters of galaxies, is sensitive to the statistical properties of dark matter primordial density fluctuations, which is assumed to follow a Gaussian probability distribution function. Within this assumption, a significant disagreement have been found between clusters counts made by Planck and their prediction when calibrated by CMB angular power spectrum. The purpose of this work is to relax the Gaussianty assumption and test if Non-Gaussianity in dark matter primordial density fluctuations, could alleviate the tension.

astro-ph.CO↗

Testing General Relativity from Curvature & Energy contents at Cosmological scale

In this work we examine what are the cosmological implications of allowing the geometrical curvature density to behave independently from the energy density contents. Using the full data extracted by Planck mission from CMB, combined with BAO and SNIa measurements, we derive, in the light of this approach, new constraints on the cosmological parameters. In particular we determine the behavior of the curvature dark energy degeneracy when allowing a varying equation of state for the latter. We also examine whether this approach could bridge the gap recently found between the Hubble parameter value determined from CMB and that from the local universe measurements

gr-qc↗

Power law cosmology model comparison with CMB scale information

Despite the ability of the cosmological concordance model ($Λ$CDM) to describe the cosmological observations exceedingly well, power law expansion of the Universe scale radius, $R(t)\propto t^n$, has been proposed as an alternative framework. We examine here these models, analyzing their ability to fit cosmological data using robust model comparison criteria. Type Ia supernovae (SNIa), baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) and acoustic scale information from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) have been used. We find that SNIa data either alone or combined with BAO can be well reproduced by both $Λ$CDM and power law expansion models with $n\sim 1.5$, while the constant expansion rate model $(n=1)$ is clearly disfavored. Allowing for some redshift evolution in the SNIa luminosity essentially removes any clear preference for a specific model. The CMB data are well known to provide the most stringent constraints on standard cosmological models, in particular, through the position of the first peak of the temperature angular power spectrum, corresponding to the sound horizon at recombination, a scale physically related to the BAO scale. Models with $n\geq 1$ lead to a divergence of the sound horizon and do not naturally provide the relevant scales for the BAO and the CMB. We retain an empirical footing to overcome this issue: we let the data choose the preferred values for these scales, while we recompute the ionization history in power law models, to obtain the distance to the CMB. In doing so, we find that the scale coming from the BAO data is not consistent with the observed position of the first peak of the CMB temperature angular power spectrum for any power law cosmology. Therefore, we conclude that when the three standard probes are combined, the $Λ$CDM model is very strongly favored over any of these alternative models, which are then essentially ruled out.

astro-ph.CO↗