arXiv subjects

Ziyang Men

Publications and source records attributed to Ziyang Men.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Parallel Dynamic Spatial Indexes

Maintaining spatial data (points in two or three dimensions) is crucial and has a wide range of applications, such as graphics, GIS, and robotics. To handle spatial data, many data structures, called spatial indexes, have been proposed, e.g. kd-trees, oct/quadtrees (also called Orth-trees), R-trees, and bounding volume hierarchies (BVHs). In real-world applications, spatial datasets tend to be highly dynamic, requiring batch updates of points with low latency. This calls for efficient parallel batch updates on spatial indexes. Unfortunately, there is very little work that achieves this. In this paper, we systematically study parallel spatial indexes, with a special focus on achieving high-performance update performance for highly dynamic workloads. We select two types of spatial indexes that are considered optimized for low-latency updates: Orth-tree and R-tree/BVH. We propose two data structures: the P-Orth tree, a parallel Orth-tree, and the SPaC-tree family, a parallel R-tree/BVH. Both the P-Orth tree and the SPaC-tree deliver superior performance in batch updates compared to existing parallel kd-trees and Orth-trees, while preserving better or competitive query performance relative to their corresponding Orth-tree and R-tree counterparts. We also present comprehensive experiments comparing the performance of various parallel spatial indexes and share our findings at the end of the paper.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2024

Parallel $k$d-tree with Batch Updates

The $k$d-tree is one of the most widely used data structures to manage multi-dimensional data. Due to the ever-growing data volume, it is imperative to consider parallelism in $k$d-trees. However, we observed challenges in existing parallel kd-tree implementations, for both constructions and updates. The goal of this paper is to develop efficient in-memory $k$d-trees by supporting high parallelism and cache-efficiency. We propose the Pkd-tree (Parallel $k$d-tree), a parallel $k$d-tree that is efficient both in theory and in practice. The Pkd-tree supports parallel tree construction, batch update (insertion and deletion), and various queries including k-nearest neighbor search, range query, and range count. We proved that our algorithms have strong theoretical bounds in work (sequential time complexity), span (parallelism), and cache complexity. Our key techniques include 1) an efficient construction algorithm that optimizes work, span, and cache complexity simultaneously, and 2) reconstruction-based update algorithms that guarantee the tree to be weight-balanced. With the new algorithmic insights and careful engineering effort, we achieved a highly optimized implementation of the Pkd-tree. We tested Pkd-tree with various synthetic and real-world datasets, including both uniform and highly skewed data. We compare the Pkd-tree with state-of-the-art parallel $k$d-tree implementations. In all tests, with better or competitive query performance, Pkd-tree is much faster in construction and updates consistently than all baselines. We released our code.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Parallel Longest Increasing Subsequence and van Emde Boas Trees

This paper studies parallel algorithms for the longest increasing subsequence (LIS) problem. Let $n$ be the input size and $k$ be the LIS length of the input. Sequentially, LIS is a simple problem that can be solved using dynamic programming (DP) in $O(n\log n)$ work. However, parallelizing LIS is a long-standing challenge. We are unaware of any parallel LIS algorithm that has optimal $O(n\log n)$ work and non-trivial parallelism (i.e., $\tilde{O}(k)$ or $o(n)$ span). This paper proposes a parallel LIS algorithm that costs $O(n\log k)$ work, $\tilde{O}(k)$ span, and $O(n)$ space, and is much simpler than the previous parallel LIS algorithms. We also generalize the algorithm to a weighted version of LIS, which maximizes the weighted sum for all objects in an increasing subsequence. To achieve a better work bound for the weighted LIS algorithm, we designed parallel algorithms for the van Emde Boas (vEB) tree, which has the same structure as the sequential vEB tree, and supports work-efficient parallel batch insertion, deletion, and range queries. We also implemented our parallel LIS algorithms. Our implementation is light-weighted, efficient, and scalable. On input size $10^9$, our LIS algorithm outperforms a highly-optimized sequential algorithm (with $O(n\log k)$ cost) on inputs with $k\le 3\times 10^5$. Our algorithm is also much faster than the best existing parallel implementation by Shen et al. (2022) on all input instances.

cs.DS↗