arXiv subjects

Zoltan Eisler

Publications and source records attributed to Zoltan Eisler.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Is Trend Still Your Friend?: A Microstructural Account of the Demise of Short-Term Trend-Following

Systematic trend following has, on average, been profitable for at least two centuries; yet since approximately 2009, short-term trends have ceased to deliver reliable returns. Using a cross-section of roughly 100 liquid futures contracts spanning 1995-2025, together with an industry-representative CTA proxy, we document the break and characterise its dependence on signal speed and asset class. We evaluate four candidate explanations - capacity constraints, market electronification, a regime change in CTA-versus-order-flow interactions, and a microstructural mechanism - and find that the first three fail on grounds of timing, magnitude, or cross-sectional heterogeneity. Our central empirical finding is that the cross-sectional variable distinguishing degraded from surviving trends is the volatility-normalised tick size: post-2008 trend PnL has collapsed on small-tick contracts across all signal horizons, while remaining essentially intact on large-tick ones. Neither asset class nor liquidity replicates this dichotomy. We interpret this result through a self-fulfilling feedback loop that, in our view, lies at the heart of the trend anomaly itself: trend signals trigger directional trades, whose market impact reinforces the very price moves that generated the signal. Both the profitability and the persistence of trend are sustained by this impact channel, which requires that trend followers can execute aggressively at reasonable cost. We argue that the post-crisis transition to HFT-dominated market making, whose liquidity-withdrawal behaviour in front of predictable directional flow has sharply contrasting consequences for sparse (small-tick) and dense (large-tick) limit order books, has broken this loop on small-tick contracts. On large-tick contracts, residual depth remains sufficient, and the loop continues to operate.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2026

Optimal execution with deterministically time varying liquidity: well posedness and price manipulation

We investigate the well-posedness in the Hadamard sense and the absence of price manipulation in the optimal execution problem within the Almgren-Chriss framework, where the temporary and permanent impact parameters vary deterministically over time. We present sufficient conditions for the existence of a unique solution and provide second-order conditions for the problem, with a particular focus on scenarios where impact parameters change monotonically over time. Additionally, we establish conditions to prevent transaction-triggered price manipulation in the optimal solution, i.e. the occurence of buying and selling in the same trading program. Our findings are supported by numerical analyses that explore various regimes in simple parametric settings for the dynamics of impact parameters.

math.OC↗

arXiv2024

Optimizing Broker Performance Evaluation through Intraday Modeling of Execution Cost

Minimizing execution costs for large orders is a fundamental challenge in finance. Firms often depend on brokers to manage their trades due to limited internal resources for optimizing trading strategies. This paper presents a methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of broker execution algorithms using trading data. We focus on two primary cost components: a linear cost that quantifies short-term execution quality and a quadratic cost associated with the price impact of trades. Using a model with transient price impact, we derive analytical formulas for estimating these costs. Furthermore, we enhance estimation accuracy by introducing novel methods such as weighting price changes based on their expected impact content. Our results demonstrate substantial improvements in estimating both linear and impact costs, providing a robust and efficient framework for selecting the most cost-effective brokers.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2020

Zooming In on Equity Factor Crowding

Crowding is most likely an important factor in the deterioration of strategy performance, the increase of trading costs and the development of systemic risk. We study the imprints of \emph{crowding} on both anonymous market data and a large database of metaorders from institutional investors in the U.S. equity market. We propose direct metrics of crowding that capture the presence of investors contemporaneously trading the same stock in the same direction by looking at fluctuations of the imbalances of trades executed on the market. We identify significant signs of crowding in well known equity signals, such as Fama-French factors and especially Momentum. We show that the rebalancing of a Momentum portfolio can explain between 1-2\% of order flow, and that this percentage has been significantly increasing in recent years.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2018

The short-term price impact of trades is universal

We analyze a proprietary dataset of trades by a single asset manager, comparing their price impact with that of the trades of the rest of the market. In the context of a linear propagator model we find no significant difference between the two, suggesting that both the magnitude and time dependence of impact are universal in anonymous, electronic markets. This result is important as optimal execution policies often rely on propagators calibrated on anonymous data. We also find evidence that in the wake of a trade the order flow of other market participants first adds further copy-cat trades enhancing price impact on very short time scales. The induced order flow then quickly inverts, thereby contributing to impact decay.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2017

Trading Lightly: Cross-Impact and Optimal Portfolio Execution

We model the impact costs of a strategy that trades a basket of correlated instruments, by extending to the multivariate case the linear propagator model previously used for single instruments. Our specification allows us to calibrate a cost model that is free of arbitrage and price manipulation. We illustrate our results using a pool of US stocks and show that neglecting cross-impact effects leads to an incorrect estimation of the liquidity and suboptimal execution strategies. We show in particular the importance of synchronizing the execution of correlated contracts.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2016

Dissecting cross-impact on stock markets: An empirical analysis

The vast majority of market impact studies assess each product individually, and the interactions between the different order flows are disregarded. This strong approximation may lead to an underestimation of trading costs and possible contagion effects. Transactions in fact mediate a significant part of the correlation between different instruments. In turn, liquidity shares the sectorial structure of market correlations, which can be encoded as a set of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. We introduce a multivariate linear propagator model that successfully describes such a structure, and accounts for a significant fraction of the covariance of stock returns. We dissect the various dynamical mechanisms that contribute to the joint dynamics of assets. We also define two simplified models with substantially less parameters in order to reduce overfitting, and show that they have superior out-of-sample performance.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2016

Price impact without order book: A study of the OTC credit index market

We present a study of price impact in the over-the-counter credit index market, where no limit order book is used. Contracts are traded via dealers, that compete for the orders of clients. Despite this distinct microstructure, we successfully apply the propagator technique to estimate the price impact of individual transactions. Because orders are typically split less than in multilateral markets, impact is observed to be mainly permanent, in line with theoretical expectations. A simple method is presented to correct for errors in our classification of trades between buying and selling. We find a very significant, temporary increase in order flow correlations during late 2015 and early 2016, which we attribute to increased order splitting or herding among investors. We also find indications that orders advertised to less dealers may have lower price impact. Quantitative results are compatible with earlier findings in other more classical markets, further supporting the argument that price impact is a universal phenomenon, to a large degree independent of market microstructure.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2016

The square-root impact law also holds for option markets

Many independent studies on stocks and futures contracts have established that market impact is proportional to the square-root of the executed volume. Is market impact quantitatively similar for option markets as well? In order to answer this question, we have analyzed the impact of a large proprietary data set of option trades. We find that the square-root law indeed holds in that case. This finding supports the argument for a universal underlying mechanism.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2012

How does the market react to your order flow?

We present an empirical study of the intertwined behaviour of members in a financial market. Exploiting a database where the broker that initiates an order book event can be identified, we decompose the correlation and response functions into contributions coming from different market participants and study how their behaviour is interconnected. We find evidence that (1) brokers are very heterogeneous in liquidity provision -- some are consistently liquidity providers while others are consistently liquidity takers. (2) The behaviour of brokers is strongly conditioned on the actions of {\it other} brokers. In contrast brokers are only weakly influenced by the impact of their own previous orders. (3) The total impact of market orders is the result of a subtle compensation between the same broker pushing the price in one direction and the liquidity provision of other brokers pushing it in the opposite direction. These results enforce the picture of market dynamics being the result of the competition between heterogeneous participants interacting to form a complicated market ecology.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2011

Models for the impact of all order book events

We propose a general framework to describe the impact of different events in the order book, that generalizes previous work on the impact of market orders. Two different modeling routes can be considered, which are equivalent when only market orders are taken into account. One model posits that each event type has a temporary impact (TIM). The "history dependent impact" model (HDIM), on the other hand, assumes that only price-changing events have a direct impact, itself modulated by the past history of all events through an "influence matrix" that measures how much, on average, an event of a given type affects the immediate impact of a price-changing event of the same sign in the future. We find in particular that aggressive market orders tend to reduce the impact of further aggressive market orders of the same sign (and increase the impact of aggressive market orders of opposite sign). We discuss the relative merits of TIM and HDIM, in particular concerning their ability to reproduce accurately the price diffusion pattern. We find that in spite of theoretical inconsistencies, TIM appears to fare better than HDIM when compared to empirical data. We ascribe this paradox to an uncontrolled approximation used to calibrate HDIMs, calling for further work on this issue.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2010

The price impact of order book events: market orders, limit orders and cancellations

While the long-ranged correlation of market orders and their impact on prices has been relatively well studied in the literature, the corresponding studies of limit orders and cancellations are scarce. We provide here an empirical study of the cross-correlation between all these different events, and their respective impact on future price changes. We define and extract from the data the "bare" impact these events would have, if they were to happen in isolation. For large tick stocks, we show that a model where the bare impact of all events is permanent and non-fluctuating is in good agreement with the data. For small tick stocks, however, bare impacts must contain a history dependent part, reflecting the internal fluctuations of the order book. We show that this effect can be accurately described by an autoregressive model on the past order flow. This framework allows us to decompose the impact of an event into three parts: an instantaneous jump component, the modification of the future rates of the different events, and the modification of the future gaps behind the best quotes. We compare in detail the present formalism with the temporary impact model that was proposed earlier to describe the impact of market orders when other types of events are not observed. Finally, we extend the model to describe the dynamics of the bid-ask spread.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2008

Diffusive behavior and the modeling of characteristic times in limit order executions

We present an empirical study of the first passage time (FPT) of order book prices needed to observe a prescribed price change Delta, the time to fill (TTF) for executed limit orders and the time to cancel (TTC) for canceled ones in a double auction market. We find that the distribution of all three quantities decays asymptotically as a power law, but that of FPT has significantly fatter tails than that of TTF. Thus a simple first passage time model cannot account for the observed TTF of limit orders. We propose that the origin of this difference is the presence of cancellations. We outline a simple model, which assumes that prices are characterized by the empirically observed distribution of the first passage time and orders are canceled randomly with lifetimes that are asymptotically power law distributed with an exponent lambda_LT. In spite of the simplifying assumptions of the model, the inclusion of cancellations is enough to account for the above observations and enables one to estimate characteristics of the cancellation strategies from empirical data.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2007

Fluctuation scaling in complex systems: Taylor's law and beyond

Complex systems consist of many interacting elements which participate in some dynamical process. The activity of various elements is often different and the fluctuation in the activity of an element grows monotonically with the average activity. This relationship is often of the form "$fluctuations \approx const.\times average^α$", where the exponent $α$ is predominantly in the range $[1/2, 1]$. This power law has been observed in a very wide range of disciplines, ranging from population dynamics through the Internet to the stock market and it is often treated under the names \emph{Taylor's law} or \emph{fluctuation scaling}. This review attempts to show how general the above scaling relationship is by surveying the literature, as well as by reporting some new empirical data and model calculations. We also show some basic principles that can underlie the generality of the phenomenon. This is followed by a mean-field framework based on sums of random variables. In this context the emergence of fluctuation scaling is equivalent to some corresponding limit theorems. In certain physical systems fluctuation scaling can be related to finite size scaling.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2007

Volatility: a hidden Markov process in financial time series

The volatility characterizes the amplitude of price return fluctuations. It is a central magnitude in finance closely related to the risk of holding a certain asset. Despite its popularity on trading floors, the volatility is unobservable and only the price is known. Diffusion theory has many common points with the research on volatility, the key of the analogy being that volatility is the time-dependent diffusion coefficient of the random walk for the price return. We present a formal procedure to extract volatility from price data, by assuming that it is described by a hidden Markov process which together with the price form a two-dimensional diffusion process. We derive a maximum likelihood estimate valid for a wide class of two-dimensional diffusion processes. The choice of the exponential Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (expOU) stochastic volatility model performs remarkably well in inferring the hidden state of volatility. The formalism is applied to the Dow Jones index. The main results are: (i) the distribution of estimated volatility is lognormal, which is consistent with the expOU model; (ii) the estimated volatility is related to trading volume by a power law of the form $σ\propto V^{0.55}$; and (iii) future returns are proportional to the current volatility which suggests some degree of predictability for the size of future returns.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2007

The limit order book on different time scales

Financial markets can be described on several time scales. We use data from the limit order book of the London Stock Exchange (LSE) to compare how the fluctuation dominated microstructure crosses over to a more systematic global behavior.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2007

Fluctuation scaling versus gap scaling

Fluctuation scaling is observed phenomenon from complex networks through finance to ecology. It means that the variance and the mean of a specific quantity are related as $\ev{σ^2|n}\propto \ev{n|A}^{2α}$ with $1/2\geq α\geq 1$ when a parameter $A$ (usually the system size) is varied. $A$ can be the strength of the node, the capitalization of the firm or the area of the habitat. On the other hand, quantities often obey gap scaling meaning that their density function depends on, say, the system size $A$ as $P(n|A) = n^{-1}F(n/A^Φ)$. This note describes that these two notions cannot coexist except when $α= 1$. In this way one can empirically exclude the possibility of gap scaling in many complex systems including population dynamics, stock market fluctuations and Internet router traffic, where $α< 1$.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2007

The dynamics of traded value revisited

We conclude from an analysis of high resolution NYSE data that the distribution of the traded value $f_i$ (or volume) has a finite variance $σ_i$ for the very large majority of stocks $i$, and the distribution itself is non-universal across stocks. The Hurst exponent of the same time series displays a crossover from weakly to strongly correlated behavior around the time scale of 1 day. The persistence in the strongly correlated regime increases with the average trading activity $\ev{f_i}$ as $H_i=H_0+γ\log\ev{f_i}$, which is another sign of non-universal behavior. The existence of such liquidity dependent correlations is consistent with the empirical observation that $σ_i\propto\ev{f_i}^α$, where $α$ is a non-trivial, time scale dependent exponent.

physics.soc-ph↗