SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Zongye Lyu

Publications and source records attributed to Zongye Lyu.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Exact and Certified Data Shapley for Weighted k-Nearest-Neighbor Regression and Soft-Label Prediction

Data Shapley answers which training points are worth what, and its nearest-neighbor specialization is the version actually deployed, shipped by toolkits such as pyDVL and OpenDataVal. Exact algorithms exist for unweighted nearest-neighbor classification and regression, and recently for weighted classification; weighted regression and soft-label prediction have resisted, the only exact method being enumeration exponential in the neighborhood size. The obstruction, in the prior authors' own words, is that the weighted regression prediction is a ratio of two coalition-dependent weighted sums: its normalization denominator blocks the additive and threshold routes, and leaves the counting route exponential in the target resolution. We close this gap with a counting dynamic program over the joint integer state of accumulated weight and weighted target, a minimal sufficient statistic for the ratio; it is exact, pseudo-polynomial, and matched exhaustive enumeration with zero mismatch. We add a certified approximation scheme for continuous weights and targets carrying a machine-checkable per-value certificate, a complexity landscape delimiting the exact problem, and a soft-label extension. We release an open-source, CPU-only library and the first exact weighted-regression ground truth. On mislabel detection our exact values are statistically equivalent to Monte-Carlo Data Shapley; exactness instead buys determinism, a certified bound, and an auditing reference, and it puts a measured price on approximation.

cs.LG

Did We Actually Fix It? An Independent Adversarial Stress-Test of Post-Point-Adjustment Evaluation Metrics for Time-Series Anomaly Detection

Point-adjustment (PA), for years the default scoring protocol in time-series anomaly detection (TSAD), was shown by Kim et al. (2022) to award near-perfect F1 to random anomaly scores. The field adopted a suite of replacement metrics (PA%K, range-based precision/recall, affiliation precision/recall, and Volume-Under-the-Surface, VUS, ROC/PR). We ask, independently and adversarially, whether these resist no-skill detectors on real benchmarks, and find the answer turns entirely on one overlooked variable: N, the number of random attempts an adversary reports the best of. Under a single honest run (N=1), not one replacement metric is gameable on any of six benchmarks (UCR, SMD, SMAP, MSL, NAB, PSM): a random detector reaches 90% of the best real detector's score on at most 11% of series for affiliation-F1, 5% for the ROC family, and 2% for the PR-based metrics and PA%K. But under best-of-N reporting, the seed-shopping endemic to ML, the metrics split sharply. affiliation-F1 and every ROC-based metric inflate steeply, affiliation crossing gameable (25% of series) by N=3 and reaching 0.98 at the full pool (N=41), the ROC family crossing by N=9-11; the PR-based metrics and PA%K stay near-flat at every N, floored near the anomaly prevalence (the lone exception is NAB at large N). A paired test finds VUS-ROC inflated on 131 series where its sibling VUS-PR is not, and never the reverse. The ROC-vs-PR split follows from the order-statistic behaviour of AUC under extreme class imbalance (a random PR-AUC is floored at prevalence); affiliation inflates by a second route, its extreme single-run leniency (already fragile at N=1). We release a pip-installable stress-test harness, and recommend reporting single-run scores or disclosing N and preferring PR-based metrics, which resist best-of-N inflation on nearly every benchmark.

stat.ML