arXiv subjects

Zongzong Wu

Publications and source records attributed to Zongzong Wu.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Reliable Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Belief Rule Base Consider Robustness Analysis

In equipment operation, the implementation of fault diagnosis is essential to ensure the continuity and safety of production equipment, improve operational efficiency and reduce maintenance costs. Since sensor readings are widely used for fault diagnosis, their reliability directly affects the results of fault diagnosis. A new fault diagnosis method is proposed to address the two problems of robustness assessment and robustness optimization of fault diagnosis models. For this purpose, a reliable fault diagnosis method based on a belief rule base (BRB) considering robustness analysis is proposed. Firstly, the robustness analysis of the BRB model is carried out systematically. Secondly, three robustness constraint strategies are proposed to optimize the robustness of the BRB fault diagnosis model. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed model is verified by taking the fault diagnosis of WD615 diesel engine and Case Western Reserve University bearings as an example, and the experiments show that the proposed model improves both accuracy and robustness.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

PropLLM: Propagation-Aware Scene Reconstruction for Network Fault Diagnosis

Network faults propagate layer by layer along topology and protocol dependencies, yet operations systems typically observe only symptomatic alerts at the tail end of propagation chains, where distinct root-cause faults may produce highly similar end-point symptoms. Existing approaches, whether rule-based, machine learning (ML)-based, or large language model (LLM)-based, fundamentally map the alert set to a diagnosis in a single pass and are structurally incapable of resolving this end-point ambiguity. This paper proposes PropLLM, which is the first to integrate the hop-by-hop scene reconstruction paradigm with the generative reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Starting from end-point alerts, PropLLM traces back hop-by-hop along the propagation path, retrieving verifiable factual evidence from a dual-layer knowledge graph (KG) at each hop, while the proposed Temporal Causal Propagation Attention (TCPA) mechanism encodes known topological causal priors directly into the attention computation to guide the model along the correct causal direction, ultimately localizing the root cause and determining the fault type through a fully evidenced causal chain. On a real-world Wi-Fi multimodal fault dataset, PropLLM improves fault type diagnosis accuracy by 3.9\% and root cause localization accuracy by 4.7\% over the strongest baseline, while reducing the hallucination rate by 50.8\%. Supplementary experiments on the TeleLogs 5G dataset further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method across different network scenarios.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Chain or tree? Re-evaluating complex reasoning from the perspective of a matrix of thought

Large Language Models (LLMs) face significant accuracy degradation due to insufficient reasoning ability when dealing with complex and abstract tasks. Thought structures such as Chain of Thought (CoT) and Tree of Thought (ToT) focus on enhancing the reasoning capability of LLMs. However, they suffer from inherent drawbacks such as redundancy within the same layer of the tree structure and the singularity of the paths in the chain structure. Some studies have utilized Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods to enhance CoT and ToT in mitigating hallucinations in LLMs, yet the fundamental shortcomings of the thought structures still persist. Furthermore, when dealing with multi-entity and multi-hop information, the retrieved verification knowledge often contains large amounts of fragmented, superficial, or even erroneous data, misleading the reasoning process of LLMs. To address these issues, we propose the Matrix of Thought (MoT), a novel and efficient thought structure for LLMs. MoT explores problems in both horizontal and vertical dimensions through a "column-cell communication" mechanism, enabling LLMs to actively engage in multi-strategy and deep thinking while reducing redundancy in the thought nodes within the column cells, thereby enhancing the reasoning capability of LLMs. Additionally, through a fact-correction mechanism, it leverages the knowledge graph triples retrieved by RAG and the original text to construct knowledge units and correct erroneous answers. To validate the effectiveness of this method, we conducted extensive experiments in three tasks: 24-point game, question answering evaluation, and proposition writing.The results demonstrate that our framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods, with reasoning time only 14.4\% of that of the baseline method, proving its efficiency and accuracy. The code for framework is available at https://github.com/lyfiter/mtqa.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

KGV: Integrating Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Cyber Threat Intelligence Credibility Assessment

Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) is a crucial tool to prevent sophisticated, organized, and weaponized cyber attacks. However, few studies have focused on the credibility assessment of CTI, and this work still requires manual analysis by cybersecurity experts. In this paper, we propose Knowledge Graph-based Verifier (KGV), the first framework integrating large language models (LLMs) with simple structured knowledge graphs (KGs) for automated CTI credibility assessment. Unlike entity-centric KGs, KGV constructs paragraph-level semantic graphs where nodes represent text segments connected through similarity analysis, which effectively enhances the semantic understanding ability of the model, reduces KG density and greatly improves response speed. Experimental results demonstrate that our KGV outperforms state-of-the-art fact reasoning methods on the CTI-200 dataset, achieving a 5.7\% improvement in F1. Additionally, it shows strong scalability on factual QA and fake news detection datasets. Compared to entity-based knowledge graphs (KGs) for equivalent-length texts, our structurally simple KG reduces node quantities by nearly two-thirds while boosting precision by 1.7\% and cutting response time by 46.7\%. In addition, we have created and publicly released the first CTI credibility assessment dataset, CTI-200. Distinct from CTI identification datasets, CTI-200 refines CTI summaries and key sentences to focus specifically on credibility assessment.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

LRCTI: A Large Language Model-Based Framework for Multi-Step Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning in Cyber Threat Intelligence Credibility Verification

Verifying the credibility of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) is essential for reliable cybersecurity defense. However, traditional approaches typically treat this task as a static classification problem, relying on handcrafted features or isolated deep learning models. These methods often lack the robustness needed to handle incomplete, heterogeneous, or noisy intelligence, and they provide limited transparency in decision-making-factors that reduce their effectiveness in real-world threat environments. To address these limitations, we propose LRCTI, a Large Language Model (LLM)-based framework designed for multi-step CTI credibility verification. The framework first employs a text summarization module to distill complex intelligence reports into concise and actionable threat claims. It then uses an adaptive multi-step evidence retrieval mechanism that iteratively identifies and refines supporting information from a CTI-specific corpus, guided by LLM feedback. Finally, a prompt-based Natural Language Inference (NLI) module is applied to evaluate the credibility of each claim while generating interpretable justifications for the classification outcome. Experiments conducted on two benchmark datasets, CTI-200 and PolitiFact show that LRCTI improves F1-Macro and F1-Micro scores by over 5%, reaching 90.9% and 93.6%, respectively, compared to state-of-the-art baselines. These results demonstrate that LRCTI effectively addresses the core limitations of prior methods, offering a scalable, accurate, and explainable solution for automated CTI credibility verification

cs.CR↗