Zou Yang | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Masking Causality and Conditional Dependence

Many regulatory and analytic problems require that a prohibited variable influence a decision only through a designated allowable channel -- a conditional-independence requirement that arises in path-specific fairness, the handling of classified information, and the regulation of trading on non-public information, among other settings. Such requirements may be enforced either stratum-by-stratum or, more commonly (and more efficiently), through a single averaged constraint on the conditional effect. We study the resulting enforcement problem from two perspectives. From the regulator's side, we formulate causal masking as a linear program and show that averaged-constraint optimization almost surely produces policies that violate the stratum-wise requirement while satisfying the averaged one exactly. The gains from masking grow with confounding and outcome heterogeneity, and detection requires precisely the conditional-independence tests that average constraints aim to avoid. From the optimizer's side, the same construction shows that masked policies recover most of the reward of unconstrained exploitation while being far harder to detect, making them attractive in any setting where the basis of decisions is itself sensitive. Together, these results argue that regulating direct dependence through averaged statistics on observed decisions is structurally limited, and that meaningful enforcement must operate at the level of the decision rule itself.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2024

Causal Data Fusion for Panel Data without a Pre-Intervention Period

Traditional panel-data causal inference frameworks, such as difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods, rely on pre-intervention data to estimate counterfactual means. However, such data may be unavailable in real-world settings when interventions are implemented in response to sudden events, such as public health crises or epidemiological shocks. In this paper, we introduce two data-fusion methods for causal inference from panel data in scenarios where pre-intervention data are unavailable. These methods leverage auxiliary reference domains with related panel data to estimate causal effects in the target domain, thereby overcoming the limitations imposed by the absence of pre-intervention data. We demonstrate the efficacy of these methods by deriving bounds on the absolute bias that converge to zero under suitable conditions, as well as through simulations across a variety of panel-data settings. Our proposed methodology renders causal inference feasible in urgent and data-constrained environments where the assumptions of existing causal inference frameworks are not met. As an application of our methodology, we evaluate the effect of a community organization vaccination intervention in Chelsea, Massachusetts on COVID-19 vaccination rates.

stat.ME↗