Searcharxiv⌕ Search

subject

cs.IR

cs.IR: explore 317 source-linked works published from 2024 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-16. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

Cost-Optimal LLM Routing with Limited User Feedback under User Satisfaction Guarantees

Inference costs for large language model (LLM) applications are rapidly growing, driven by surging demand and rising infrastructure cost. Users expect high-quality responses, and in commercial settings this is formally codified in Service Level Agreements (SLAs), creating a fundamental tension between cost and quality. Recent progress on cost-aware LLM request routing has shown potential to resolve this tension, but existing approaches rely on complete feedback signals, offline training, extensive per-workload tuning, and most lack SLA guarantees or inference-time adaptivity. We introduce SLARouter, an online routing algorithm that learns a cost-optimal policy from the sparse, one-sided user feedback available in production systems. SLARouter provides theoretical guarantees for both cost optimality and strict SLA compliance. Experiments across a wide range of LLM benchmarks show that SLARouter satisfies SLA constraints without the need for per-benchmark tuning, reducing operating cost by up to 2.2x over existing baselines.

cs.LG↗

AtomCite: Verification and Correction of Supplied Page-Level Citations in Multi-Page Documents

Large language models answering questions over multi-page documents are expected to cite the supporting pages, yet supplied citations are sometimes inaccurate, and current evaluations score citations at generation time or against text passages: no existing benchmark evaluates whether a system can verify and correct a page-level citation already attached to an answer. We propose AtomCite, an agentic framework that parses an answer into claims, checks each claim against the image of its cited page, and applies a deterministic repair policy. To evaluate it, we introduce DocCite, to our knowledge the first benchmark for systems that verify and correct page-level citations in document images. Built on MP-DocVQA and DUDE, it combines 928 validated injected instances with 2,468 candidate natural errors harvested from frontier- and efficiency-tier models, of which a two-annotator audit confirms 1,909 as genuine errors. Primary labels are assigned deterministically, not by LLM judges, with the human audit as a separate validation layer. Across three model families (Gemini, Claude, and GPT), AtomCite reaches around 93% binary verification accuracy on the injected benchmark, significantly outperforming every OCR-only condition, including a compute-matched control, and exceeding every prior text-based baseline given the same OCR text. Its repair policy lifts citation precision on the injected mix from a constructed 34% to 87-90% while retaining over 90% of correct claims. AtomCite also transfers: with frozen prompts and zero training, it raises the hallucination-detection scores of two open 7-8B models on five public benchmarks above the same models prompted as direct judges. Finally, the audit shows that noise in automatic labels biases measured verifier accuracy and can reverse system rankings, so evaluations relying only on synthetic or automatic labels risk mismeasuring verification capability.

cs.CL↗

Do All Nodes Benefit Equally from Knowledge Graphs? Adaptive Node-Aware KG Fusion for Recommendation

KG-aware recommendation has been widely studied to alleviate data sparsity by using knowledge graphs (KGs), which represent items, entities, and their relations as graphs and provide item-side knowledge. However, existing methods incorporate item knowledge without considering how much each user or item node should rely on it. As a result, they apply KG signals indiscriminately across nodes, even to nodes whose collaborative filtering (CF) signals from the interaction graph (IG) are already reliable. In this paper, we propose AdaKG (Adaptive Node-Aware KG Fusion), a novel KG-aware recommendation method that adaptively adjusts the contribution of auxiliary knowledge for each node. Since user-item interactions and item knowledge provide different types of signals, directly mixing them can distort the CF signals. To avoid this, AdaKG separately encodes the IG and KG with view-specific encoders, allowing each view to capture its own information. It then estimates how strongly each node should rely on item knowledge by measuring the stability of its CF signals under small adversarial perturbations, assigning a larger KG contribution to less stable nodes. Finally, AdaKG adaptively aligns the IG and KG embeddings in a shared space and fuses them according to the estimated node-wise reliance. Through experiments, we show that AdaKG achieves strong performance compared with its baselines and the effectiveness of our adaptive fusion strategy.

cs.IR↗

SurveyAgent-HKA: A multi-agent framework for scientific survey generation with LLMs and human knowledge augmentation

Automatic scientific survey generation has become an important task in scientific document processing. The common approach of retrieving literature from a single source (e.g., arXiv) and generating surveys through a one-pass large language model (LLM) call often leads to limited reference coverage and, more importantly, fails to replicate the expert-driven revision process that is crucial for writing high-quality surveys. In this paper, we introduce SurveyAgent-HKA, a multi-agent framework that improves end-to-end scientific survey generation by incorporating knowledge derived from published surveys and peer-review comments. The framework decomposes survey generation into well-defined sub-tasks handled by LLM-powered agent. It first retrieves relevant papers from multiple sources and identifies key topics through clustering to construct an initial outline, which is then refined using outlines from related human-written surveys. Based on the refined outline, topic-focused papers are retrieved and re-ranked to select for drafting a well-grounded survey. Then, we identify common issues raised by experts in peer-review comments from published surveys to guide the revisions and finalize the survey. Experiments on two domains show that our approach outperforms mainstream baselines in citation quality, structural consistency, and content quality. Furthermore, our framework is efficient in both time and cost, making it a practical solution for broader AI-assisted scientific writing applications.

cs.CL↗

Evaluating Deep-Search Agents under Hierarchical Web Evidence Poisoning

Search-augmented LLM agents are increasingly used for consumer decisions, making them vulnerable to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) poisoning. Existing benchmarks largely measure whether manipulated content is retrieved or endorsed, but do not track whether an agent verifies suspicious evidence, revises adopted claims, or recovers before producing its final recommendation. We introduce HAE-GEO, a benchmark that tracks the full trajectory from exposure to recovery under progressively more persuasive Web poisoning. Agents interact via a multi-turn Search-Scrape interface across three attack levels (L1 direct assertion, L2 contextual camouflage, and L3 apparent corroboration), supported by a controlled corpus of 72,039 clean pages and 770 poisoned pages per level spanning 8 product categories and 154 brands. Evaluation combines deterministic behavioral measures with six semantic rubric dimensions. Evaluating 10 agents, we find three recurring patterns: evidence recognition degrades under the corroboration trap; agentic search improves final resistance without improving evidence recognition or utility; and defense prompting increases verification, yet rarely converts verification into recovery.

cs.CR↗

Visual Analysis of LLM-based Entity Resolution from Scientific Papers

This paper focuses on the visual analytics support for extracting domain-specific entity from extensive scientific literature, a task with inherent limitations using traditional named entity resolution methods. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4, significant improvements over conventional machine learning approaches have been achieved due to LLM's capability on entity resolution integrate abilities such as understanding multiple types of text. This research introduces a new visual analysis pipeline that integrates these advanced LLMs with versatile visualization and interaction designs to support batch entity resolution. Specifically, we focus on a specific material science field of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and a large data collection namely CSD-MOFs. Through collaboration with domain experts in material science, we obtain well-labeled synthesis paragraphs. We propose human-in-the-loop refinement over the entity resolution process using visual analytics techniques, which allows domain experts to interactively integrate insights into LLM intelligence, including error analysis and interpretation of the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) algorithm. Our evaluation through the case study of example selection for RAG demonstrates that this human-machine collaborative approach improved single-document entity resolution accuracy by approximately 30%.

cs.IR↗

PAGR: Proof-Carrying Algebraic-Geometric Retrieval: A Quiver-, Provenance-, and Sheaf-Theoretic Framework for Grounded LLM Retrieval

Retrieval-augmented generation is usually formulated as a statistical information-retrieval problem. Graph-based variants add relational structure, but the mathematical status of that structure is often left underspecified. Three distinct questions tend to be conflated: which statements are certified as knowledge, which latent representations are useful for retrieval, and which multi-hop compositions are semantically admissible. We propose Proof-Carrying Algebraic-Geometric Retrieval (PAGR), a framework that separates these questions mathematically. Its symbolic layer is a many-sorted relational theory generated by a typed quiver, path equations, and positive Horn inclusions. A quiver representation assigns inner-product spaces to entity types and linear operators to relations. A cellular sheaf measures local-to-global consistency. Semiring provenance records derivations and supports machine-checkable certificates. The central principle is epistemic separation: learned geometry may rank and organize evidence, but cannot promote a hypothesis to certified ground truth. We show the certification criterion is invariant under arbitrary replacement of learned components. Further results include a conditional completeness bound, identification of the isometry group as the relevant symmetry for residual-based retrieval, a cohomological consistency diagnostic, and a bounded-bisimulation index for admissible-path expansion. PAGR is a mathematical architecture for separating where a system should look from what it is allowed to treat as knowledge.

math.RT↗

ExpertLens: Visualizing Embedding Spaces for Post-Hoc Explainability in MoE Enhanced Retrievers

Neural models, including dense retrievers, have been widely adopted in Information Retrieval (IR), often delivering state-of-the-art performance. Despite their effectiveness, these models operate as black boxes, limiting the interpretability of their ranking decisions. Existing post-hoc explainability methods for neural rankers primarily focus on feature-level attributions, which can be insufficient to capture the complexity of learned embedding spaces. In this work, we propose ExpertLens, a post-hoc explainability framework for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)-enhanced dense retrievers that shifts focus from local scalar feature importance to representation-level global interpretability. ExpertLens leverages discriminative embedding space visualizations jointly with automatically extracted Concept Activation Vectors to reveal how expert routing drives embedding space formulation and retrieval effectiveness. Experiments across five IR benchmarks and two MoE-enhanced dense retrievers show that expert routing consistently improves embedding space structure, positioning queries and their relevant documents into better-defined geometric neighborhoods. Analysis of expert subspaces further reveals general-purpose dominant experts, along with minority experts exhibiting distinct linguistic specialization, with subspaces arranged according to multi-semantic concept similarity. Our code is publicly available.

cs.IR↗

Customer Relationship Intelligence: Integrating CRM and MDM for Enhanced Customer Engagement

This study examines how Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Master Data Management (MDM), and Customer Knowledge Management (CKM) jointly constitute a Customer Relationship Intelligence (CRI) framework for enhanced Customer Engagement (CE). A cross-sectional survey of 100 participants across retail, healthcare, IT, and telecommunications sectors was analysed using Spearman rho correlation and ordinal logistic regression (IBM SPSS). Bivariate correlations were weak and non-significant (r<0.19, p>0.06). Regression identified CRM (beta=0.717, p=0.002) and CKM (beta=0.581, p=0.009) as significant positive predictors of CE; MDM showed a positive but non-significant direct effect (beta=0.346, p=0.071). The model explained 20.5% of CE variance (Nagelkerke R^2=0.205). Parallel mediation analysis (Hayes PROCESS Model 4, 5,000 bootstrap samples) found no significant indirect effects of MDM on CE via CRM (IE=0.021, 95% BC CI [-0.072, 0.121]) or CKM (IE=0.032, 95% BC CI [-0.061, 0.126]); Hypothesis H4 was not supported. CRM and CKM emerge as the principal drivers of CE within the CRI framework, while MDM functions as a foundational data quality enabler whose strategic value is realised through its enabling effect on CRM execution and knowledge management. Findings should be treated as exploratory given the sample size and cross-sectional design. Future research should replicate with larger sector-specific samples and longitudinal designs, particularly in regulated BFSI contexts where MDM architecture is shaped by data governance mandates.

cs.AI↗

Closing the Long-Short View Gap in Sequential Recommendation without Cached History

Sequential recommenders are typically trained on long user histories to capture rich behavioral signals, yet serving with training-length sequences is often impractical due to real-time efficiency constraints. Directly using only recent behaviors leads to a severe performance drop. To bridge this gap, existing approaches compress user histories into persistent per-user states, storing and retrieving them at inference time; while effective, they impose non-trivial infrastructure overhead and offer little remedy in cold-start scenarios. In this paper, we empirically identify two structural flaws rooted in geometric properties and dataset sparsity, and propose a novel two-stage framework to close the long-short-view performance gap. Specifically, in the first stage, we replace the commonly used dot-product with angular similarity scoring and leverage a modified softmax to counter prefix position bias. In the second stage, we fine-tune only bias and LayerNorm components, which are universal to standard sequential backbones, for further improvement. Both stages are guided by carefully designed learning objectives. Extensive experiments on two representative backbones across three public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework.

cs.IR↗

Relevance is not enough: A Communication-Oriented Retrieval System for Consequential Scientific Question Answering

AI systems increasingly answer scientific questions about health, safety, and the environment. But most retrieval-augmented generation systems are tuned to provide factually correct, on-topic answers rather than to help non-experts understand what those answers mean for their lives and decisions. We focus on consequential scientific questions whose results directly shape people's lives and study them through a public water-quality communication system, where residents and community leaders interpret the findings and choose actions. Their experiences show that on-topic answers can still be insufficient without explanation and context and that the emotional weight of risk information cannot be ignored. Our system first classifies each question by reasoning type (for example, causal versus policy-based), then generates follow-up questions to identify missing evidence and retrieve it. One component clearly distinguishes between what is known and what is uncertain, while another rewrites scientific details into accessible language, using persona-based styles, such as a caring neighbor or an administrative official, to adapt tone and readability. Ablations on over $160$ questions show that the system uses $\textit{an order of magnitude less context}$ and, in several configurations, improves human-rated completeness. A completeness metric co-designed with community members and a fine-tuned learned judge reveal that standard relevance scores explain about $1\%$ of variation in human completeness ratings, and even the tuned judge only moderately aligns with humans, indicating that completeness is a distinct human-centered objective that current metrics do not reliably capture.

cs.IR↗

Abstention vs. Hallucination: Benchmarking LLM Source Attribution for Scientific Citations

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly generate citation-backed responses, yet citation hallucination remains a major challenge for trustworthy scientific information access. We introduce REASONS, a benchmark of 12,723 sentence-level citation instances spanning 12 arXiv subject categories, designed to evaluate scientific citation attribution under varying evidence conditions. We propose a dual-metric framework consisting of Abstention Rate (AR) and Hallucination Rate (HR) to characterize the trade-off between reliability and responsiveness. Using author-attribution and title-attribution tasks, we evaluate proprietary and open-source LLMs under zero-context, metadata-augmented, cascaded metadata-augmented prompting (CMP), retrieval-augmented, and adversarial settings. Advanced RAG lowers HR relative to Naive RAG (65.4% vs. 87.6%) but reduces AR from 5.0% to 0%. Under adversarial metadata, several systems exceed 85% HR, while retrieval-augmented variants frequently maintain near-zero abstention. Human evaluation of 1,000 outputs ($κ=0.78$) finds a 12.7:1 ratio of factual hallucinations to acceptable paraphrases. Our findings demonstrate that citation attribution systems should be evaluated not only for correctness but also for their ability to abstain appropriately under uncertainty. REASONS provides a benchmark and evaluation framework for studying attribution reliability in citation generation.

cs.CL↗

Graph Foundation Models for Recommendation: A Comprehensive Survey

Recommender systems (RS) serve as a fundamental tool for navigating the vast expanse of online information, with deep learning advancements playing an increasingly important role in improving ranking accuracy. Among these, graph neural networks (GNNs) excel at extracting higher-order structural information, while large language models (LLMs) are designed to process and comprehend natural language, making both approaches highly effective and widely adopted. Recent research has focused on graph foundation models (GFMs), which integrate the strengths of GNNs and LLMs to model complex RS problems more efficiently by leveraging the graph-based structure of user-item relationships alongside textual understanding. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of GFM-based RS technologies by introducing a clear taxonomy of current approaches, diving into methodological details, and highlighting key challenges and future directions. By synthesizing recent advancements, we aim to offer valuable insights into the evolving landscape of GFM-based recommender systems.

cs.IR↗

Adapting MLLMs for Nuanced Video Retrieval

Our objective is to build an embedding model that captures the nuanced relationship between a search query and candidate videos. We cover three aspects of nuanced retrieval: (i) temporal, (ii) negation, and (iii) multimodal. For temporal nuance, we consider chiral actions that need distinguishing between temporally opposite actions like "opening a door" vs. "closing a door". For negation, we consider queries with negators such as "not", "none" that allow a user to specify what they do not want. For multimodal nuance, we consider the task of composed retrieval where the query comprises a video along with a text edit instruction. The goal is to develop a unified embedding model that handles such nuances effectively. To that end, we repurpose a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) trained to generate text into an embedding model. We fine-tune it with a contrastive loss on text alone with carefully sampled hard negatives that instill the desired nuances in the learned embedding space. Despite the text-only training, our method achieves state of the art performance on all benchmarks for nuanced video retrieval. We also analyze how this improvement is achieved, and show that text-only training reduces the modality gap between text and video embeddings leading to better organization of the embedding space.

cs.CV↗

Nepali Passport Question Answering: A Low-Resource Dataset for Public Service Applications

Nepali, a low-resource language, faces significant challenges in building an effective information retrieval system due to the unavailability of annotated data and computational linguistic resources. In this study, we attempt to address this gap by preparing a pair-structured Nepali Question-Answer dataset. We focus on Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for passport-related services, building a data set for training and evaluation of IR models. In our study, we have fine-tuned transformer-based embedding models for semantic similarity in question-answer retrieval. The fine-tuned models were compared with the baseline BM25. In addition, we implement a hybrid retrieval approach, integrating fine-tuned models with BM25, and evaluate the performance of the hybrid retrieval. Our results show that the fine-tuned SBERT-based models outperform BM25, whereas multilingual E5 embedding-based models achieve the highest retrieval performance among all evaluated models.

cs.IR↗

Improving Federated Graph Recommendation with Semantic Guidance

Graph-based recommendation models effectively capture high-order collaborative signals from user--item interaction graphs. Federated learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving training across distributed clients. However, directly aggregating graph representations under FL is challenging: locally learned structural embeddings are not globally aligned under non-IID data distributions, and naive parameter averaging fails to recover cross-client relational structure. Existing federated graph-based approaches primarily rely on structural aggregation, yet overlook the global semantic knowledge encoded in large language models (LLMs). In this work, we propose a semantic--structural federated graph recommendation framework that leverages LLM embeddings to guide cross-client alignment. Each client learns user representations from its local interaction graph and summarizes typical interaction patterns into compact semantic vectors using a frozen LLM encoder. These vectors are sent to the server, which identifies semantically related patterns across different clients and combines their structural representations accordingly. The updated representations are then returned to clients to refine subsequent local training. This design enables collaboration guided by shared semantic understanding without exposing raw interaction data, preserving both recommendation accuracy and privacy. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over existing federated graph-based baselines.

cs.IR↗

SafeGEO: Understanding Generative Engine Optimization Risks in Recommendation Agents

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) lets content owners rewrite web content to increase their visibility in generative systems. In recommendation agents, this creates a risk that sources controlled by sellers make flawed products appear better supported than they are. We study this risk at the generation stage by asking whether recommendation agents continue to make decisions that align with user utility when these sources are rewritten for GEO. To make this question measurable, we construct SafeGEO, an evaluation suite with 22 GEO attack variants across 600 recommendation cases. We empirically show that GEO attacks can promote flawed target products: they increase the rate at which such flawed products enter the recommendation set by up to 83.2 percentage points (pp). We further study whether agent-side design choices can mitigate this risk and show that simple defenses reduce harmful target promotion by up to 39.2 pp. These gains are substantial but do not restore the no-GEO performance, showing that GEO remains a serious risk despite mitigation.

cs.IR↗

An Event is Worth One Token: Event Tokenization for Industrial-scale LLM Recommendation

LLM-based recommendation has scaled along model capacity and sequence length, yet each position encodes only text, semantic IDs, or a few categorical features, discarding rich user, item, context, and outcome signals available at each event. Under autoregressive modeling, this yields weak queries at each position and, since each position becomes context for the next, the degradation compounds across the sequence. We propose an event-centric paradigm that represents each interaction by its full temporal snapshot, and identify a new scaling dimension we term snapshot resolution: the amount of information encoded per event. To efficiently scale snapshot resolution, we introduce AMBER (Autoregressive Modeling via Bottlenecked Event Representation), which compresses each temporal snapshot into a compact Event Token, a new LLM input modality. The representation is learned end-to-end, while Event Tokens are pre-computed and cached for serving, decoupling snapshot resolution from real-time serving compute. On industrial-scale ranking and retrieval benchmarks, AMBER advances the compute-quality Pareto frontier relative to alternative recommendation paradigms. At sufficient capacity, a single unified tokenizer even outperforms dedicated per-entity tokenizers, demonstrating positive transfer across structurally different entity types. AMBER's Event Tokens also transfer across model architectures: when integrated into a heavily optimized non-LLM ranker as serving-time historical features, they yield statistically significant improvements. Further scaling Event Tokenizer capacity provides additional improvements.

cs.IR↗
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
Cost-Optimal LLM Routing with Limited User Feedback under User Satisfaction Guarantees2026-09-052606.19376arxiv
AtomCite: Verification and Correction of Supplied Page-Level Citations in Multi-Page Documents2026-09-052609.05802arxiv
Do All Nodes Benefit Equally from Knowledge Graphs? Adaptive Node-Aware KG Fusion for Recommendation2026-09-052609.05909arxiv
SurveyAgent-HKA: A multi-agent framework for scientific survey generation with LLMs and human knowledge augmentation2026-09-052609.05938arxiv
Evaluating Deep-Search Agents under Hierarchical Web Evidence Poisoning2026-09-172609.06027arxiv
Visual Analysis of LLM-based Entity Resolution from Scientific Papers2026-09-052609.06037arxiv
PAGR: Proof-Carrying Algebraic-Geometric Retrieval: A Quiver-, Provenance-, and Sheaf-Theoretic Framework for Grounded LLM Retrieval2026-09-052609.06127arxiv
ExpertLens: Visualizing Embedding Spaces for Post-Hoc Explainability in MoE Enhanced Retrievers2026-09-052609.06155arxiv
Customer Relationship Intelligence: Integrating CRM and MDM for Enhanced Customer Engagement2026-09-052609.06189arxiv
Closing the Long-Short View Gap in Sequential Recommendation without Cached History2026-09-052609.06219arxiv
Relevance is not enough: A Communication-Oriented Retrieval System for Consequential Scientific Question Answering2026-09-052609.06222arxiv
Abstention vs. Hallucination: Benchmarking LLM Source Attribution for Scientific Citations2026-09-152405.02228arxiv
Graph Foundation Models for Recommendation: A Comprehensive Survey2026-09-042502.08346arxiv
Adapting MLLMs for Nuanced Video Retrieval2026-09-042512.13511arxiv
Nepali Passport Question Answering: A Low-Resource Dataset for Public Service Applications2026-09-042603.13320arxiv
Improving Federated Graph Recommendation with Semantic Guidance2026-09-042606.15277arxiv
SafeGEO: Understanding Generative Engine Optimization Risks in Recommendation Agents2026-09-042606.28356arxiv
An Event is Worth One Token: Event Tokenization for Industrial-scale LLM Recommendation2026-09-042608.25546arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.