Searcharxiv⌕ Search

subject

math.HO

math.HO: explore 4 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-16. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

Illustrating Hyperbolic Surfaces with Mesh Embeddings

Hyperbolic geometry exhibits geometric phenomena, such as fast area growth, that are difficult to visualize faithfully in Euclidean space, and which standard models like the Poincaré disk can obscure. To bring hyperbolic geometry to life, we embed hyperbolic surfaces in Euclidean space by discretizing the surfaces into meshes, and minimizing a distortion energy so that the edge lengths in the embeddings match those in the hyperbolic plane. The resulting surfaces buckle and ruffle to accommodate the extra area, making visible what flat models hide. We present exemplary illustrations, such as embedded disks, equidistant strips, diverging geodesics, and also artistic organic-like renders. We discuss our use of these models, as renders and 3D prints, in research talks, public engagement, outreach, and education.

math.HO↗

The Prime Clockwork: A Dynamic Representation of Modular and Multiplicative Arithmetic

The way numbers are represented strongly influences which arithmetic structures are easy to see. The \emph{prime clockwork} is a recursively growing discrete dynamical system: a list of autonomous two-hand clocks driven by one common $+1$ signal. No primes or primality labels are supplied. Starting empty, the process appends a clock of period $n$ whenever none already present rings; the primes are generated internally as its growth times. For each installed prime $p$, the seconds reading $R_p$ advances through $0,\ldots,p-1$, and each return to zero increments the minutes reading $M_p$, which counts completed $p$-cycles. The hands use only increment, comparison, reset, and carry, without explicit \texttt{mod} or \texttt{div} operations. At time $n$, $n=pM_p(n)+R_p(n)$. The valuation readout $V_p(n)=ν_p(n)$ is generated locally: it is zero when the seconds counter is non-zero (silent state) and otherwise (when the p-clock rings) one plus the earlier valuation addressed by the current minutes reading. The valuation vector gives the integer in unique prime-factorized form. Its coordinates add and subtract under multiplication and division, representing every positive rational uniquely; divisibility becomes weak componentwise order, and unique factorization is natural in this representation. Finite seconds arrays form Cartesian-product state spaces whose common orbit visits every joint state once before repeating; this \emph{grand cycle} is the order-sensitive dynamical counterpart of the Chinese remainder theorem. The same coordinates expose gcd, lcm, perfect powers, Bézout's identity, and Euler's totient. Rational valuation levels reach certain positive algebraic irrationalities, but not algebraic numbers in general.

math.HO↗

Fundamental Mathematics in the Age of AI -- The Residue, the Journey, and the Ecology

Large language models have begun refuting long-standing conjectures and solving long-open problems. The introspection this has prompted about the future of mathematical discovery is well under way, and the anxiety accompanying it legitimate -- but both, we claim, are attached to the wrong loss. What machines now produce is the countable part of mathematics -- theorems, proofs, refutations -- which was always the work's residue, not its product. The distinction is old, and not economic: a result can be taken in its finished essence, or in the operations that engendered it. The product is human understanding: not a stock of results but a collective, hard-won way of deciphering the world and acting upon it. The two are arcs of a single loop: understanding tells us where to look; looking produces the residue; and taking it up again, one journey at a time, rebuilds shared understanding. Machines are strong on the countable arc, absent from the one that feeds it. The peril is to leave the loop open. AI did not create the confusion between residue and product; it has called a bluff long on the books, driving the cost of the residue towards zero and making the scarce thing visible at last. A new instrument makes a new way of working before it makes a new result. The pressing questions are therefore institutional: who can check an announced result, whoever announces it; what work and training become for the next generation of researchers; and whether the one thing that cannot be mass-produced -- the journey that nourishes a shared understanding -- continues to be funded. Mathematics, we argue, is uniquely placed among the sciences on the first -- a proof answers to no one's permission -- and uniquely exposed on the other two: teaching cannot go on as before, and no collective position yet exists; and the journey has never had a price our institutions knew how to pay. The decision is ours.

math.HO↗

Explanations, Prompts, and Formalizations: Arguments for New Norms in LLM-Enabled Mathematical Research

As several mathematical conjectures have recently been settled using large language models (LLMs), the mathematical community has formulated norms and recommendations regarding the publishing of such results. These norms do not cover the disclosure of the prompts and precise software setup used to obtain those results, nor do they require that results be formalized in a manner that allows for machine verification. I argue that both of these are essential. In addition, since LLM-obtained results may be hard to understand, human authors have the responsibility to invent intuitive explanations.

math.HO↗
Compare source metadata on this page

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.