Searcharxiv⌕ Search

SEARCH · Searcharxiv

Search Searcharxiv

Search indexed arXiv papers on artificial intelligence, large language models, computer vision and robotics. Read source abstracts and follow links to arXiv.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AI

Recent developments in AI safety research have called for red-teaming methods that effectively surface potential risks posed by generative AI models, with growing emphasis on how red-teamers' backgrounds and perspectives shape their strategies and the risks they uncover. While automated red-teaming approaches promise to complement human red-teaming through larger-scale exploration, existing automated approaches do not account for human identities and rarely incorporate human inputs. In this work, we explore persona-driven red-teaming to advance both automated red-teaming and human-AI collaboration. We first develop PersonaTeaming Workflow, which incorporates personas into the adversarial prompt generation process to explore a wider spectrum of adversarial strategies. Compared to RainbowPlus, a state-of-the-art automated red-teaming method, PersonaTeaming Workflow achieves higher attack success rates while maintaining prompt diversity. However, since automated personas only approximate real human perspectives, we further instantiate PersonaTeaming Workflow as PersonaTeaming Playground, a user-facing interface that enables red-teamers to author their own personas and collaborate with AI to mutate and refine prompts. In a user study with 11 industry practitioners, we found that PersonaTeaming Playground enabled diverse red-teaming strategies and outputs that practitioners perceived as useful, and that AI-generated suggestions in the PersonaTeaming Playground encouraged out-of-the-box thinking even when practitioners did not follow them strictly. Together, our work advances both automated and human-in-the-loop approaches to red-teaming, while shedding light on interaction patterns and design insights for supporting human-AI collaboration in generative AI red-teaming.

cs.HC↗

A City-Scale Dataset of Traffic Flows, Travel Times, and Urban Context

We present a multi-source traffic dataset derived from Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) recordings in Padua, Italy, spanning from February 2026 to August 2026. The dataset combines traffic volume time series, aggregated at 10-minute intervals, with time-varying trajectory-based flow statistics including transition probability matrices, average travel times, and flow residuals. To enrich the traffic measurements with urban contextual information, we integrate Points Of Interest (POIs), demographic data, meteorological variables, and road infrastructure data. All components are accessible through a Python class that loads temporal and contextual data exploiting a spatio-temporal graph representation. Validation analyses confirm that the dataset captures expected traffic patterns, such as morning and evening rush hours, as well as weekdays vs. weekend days traffic routines.

physics.soc-ph↗

Mapping the Reddit Bot Ecosystem: Taxonomy and Evolution

Automated agents increasingly participate in online communities, yet their population structure and roles remain poorly understood. Using a dataset of 3,389 identified bots and their full activity histories, we construct a taxonomy of bot "species" on the news aggregation and social media platform Reddit based on temporal, community, linguistic, and semantic features. Clustering analysis reveals 18 distinct bot types spanning content-specialized, behavior-driven, and infrastructural roles such as moderation and utility support. In addition, temporal analysis shows that bot numbers and activity expanded rapidly before peaking around the COVID-19 period, then started declining even before Reddit's 2023 API policy changes. However, the overall diversity of bot species has remained remarkably stable. These findings suggest that online bot populations form evolving digital ecosystems.

cs.SI↗

AtlasNLP: A Country-Aware Atlas of Dataset Representation in NLP

Understanding which countries are represented in NLP datasets is essential for identifying gaps, targeting data collection, measuring progress, and informing AI policy. However, geographic metadata is very rarely available, and country-level representation is often hidden behind broad language-level claims. We introduce AtlasNLP, a country-aware atlas of over 13,000 NLP dataset records across normalized NLP task categories, tracking both the populations represented and where datasets are produced. AtlasNLP includes AtlasNLP-Gold, a human-curated reference set, and AtlasNLP-Core, an ACL-derived large-scale collection. Using this resource, we show that (1) dataset coverage is highly uneven across countries and tasks; (2) dataset production and representation are geographically asymmetric; and (3) language coverage does not imply geographic representation. These findings reveal blind spots in current dataset documentation practices and motivate more explicit geographic metadata for country-aware NLP evaluation.

cs.CL↗

WebXR and Commercial Game Engines for the Metaverse: A Socio-Technical Analysis of Openness, Interoperability, and Sustainability

The Metaverse is often framed as a persistent, interoperable, and embodied network of virtual and augmented environments. Yet, most contemporary XR applications are developed through commercial game engines and distributed through proprietary app stores, creating tensions between openness and platform dependency. This paper critically examines open WebXR technologies with conventional commercial game-engine pipelines, with particular attention to XR hardware, software architectures, developer workflows, governance, ethics, interoperability, and sustainability. We argue that WebXR may provide a viable route toward a more accessible, device-independent, and institutionally sustainable Metaverse, especially for education, research, cultural heritage, prototyping, and public-interest applications. At the same time, commercial engines remain advantageous for graphically intensive, low-latency, deeply integrated, and large-scale XR products. The paper concludes that the choice should not be framed as WebXR versus engines, but as a continuum: WebXR is preferable when accessibility, interoperability, low-friction deployment, and long-term maintainability are primary goals, whereas native engines remain preferable when performance, platform-specific hardware access, and production-grade tooling dominate.

cs.CY↗

Navigating the digital spectrum: Assessing political bias, stability, and downstream fairness in Large Language Models

Large Language Models are increasingly deployed as information intermediaries, yet measuring their political behavior remains fragile because questionnaire results mix model dispositions with measurement artifacts and response-elicitation biases. We introduce a robust Political Compass Test evaluation framework that samples 300 configurations across an eight-dimensional perturbation space varying language, framing, instructions, answer format, option order, and persona wording. We evaluate eight Gemma 3 and Qwen 3 models across 14 languages and three quantization levels, obtaining design-averaged political coordinates with quantified uncertainty. Most models lean Libertarian-Left on average, but instruction phrasing, language, and answer format significantly affect recovered coordinates. Cross-lingual differences primarily reflect coordinate drift rather than distinct cultural reasoning. Reverse-engineering the test also exposes axis-weighting imbalances and the collapse of degenerate responses toward the center, so near-origin estimates for the smallest models can reflect weak signal rather than centrism. Free-text reasoning and chat-then-classify elicitation alter recovered coordinates, and larger models show clearer persona separation, with a specific failure of the Authoritarian-Left persona to move most models in the intended social direction. In downstream tasks, persona effects are modest relative to model size and target group for hate-speech detection, while base and centrist prompts give the highest agreement for topic-level sentiment. Political role prompting therefore has measurable but task- and dataset-specific downstream effects.

cs.CL↗

Silent Revision: Measuring Undisclosed Change in the Safety Frameworks of Frontier AI Developers

Frontier AI developers publish safety frameworks that commit them to evidencing whether their models are dangerous. The European Union and California now treat these documents as instruments of accountability, and both already impose duties on their revision. Neither requires the revision to be legible, in the sense that a reader could learn from the developer's own account what changed. We introduce the silent revision rate, the share of material changes to a framework's commitments that the developer's published account does not identify, and we release the versioned, hash-pinned corpus needed to compute it. The corpus contains every public version of the safety frameworks of the twelve developers that have published one, together with each provider's changelog, redline or announcement. We trace 710 commitment instances across twelve consecutive version pairs, code them against a frozen codebook, and adjudicate 244 individually. Three findings follow. First, 67% of material changes (95% CI 62 to 72) are silent under a strict standard and 53% under a lenient one, falling to 49% at section granularity. Second, silence appears to track the form of the account, since narrative announcements run at 74% against 63% for itemised changelogs, whereas account length in words barely matters; on the test that respects nesting the difference is suggestive. Third, 77% of traced changes weaken or remove a commitment, and in seven of eight pairs weakenings are more often silent than strengthenings. The statutory remedy therefore exists and specifies the wrong artefact. A justification explains why a framework changed, an enumeration states what changed, and only the latter makes revision auditable. We argue that publication duties should carry an enumeration duty, which one provider already meets, voluntarily and incompletely.

cs.CY↗

What AI Benchmarks Actually Measure: Adapting Convergent and Discriminant Validity to Interrogate Fifty-Six AI Benchmarks

Benchmarks play a central role in the development and governance of models, yet it is often unclear whether they actually measure the concepts they purport to measure (e.g., reasoning, refusal). We adapt convergent and discriminant validity from the social sciences into an approach for interrogating AI benchmarks, applying it to 56 capability and safety benchmarks across 53 models. We label benchmarks with substantively similar purported concepts to a shared assigned concept, and ask whether model rankings on benchmarks with the same assigned concept correlate more strongly than rankings on benchmarks with different assigned concepts. We ask analogous questions at the item level using item response theory (IRT) models. We find that correlations between model rankings on benchmarks with the same assigned safety concepts are often weak, suggesting these concepts may be conceptualized inconsistently across benchmarks. For assigned capability concepts (e.g., reasoning, knowledge), model rankings are often as strongly correlated among benchmarks with the same assigned concept as between benchmarks with different assigned concepts, suggesting these capability concepts may not discriminate well from one another. In some cases, benchmarks that share design elements (e.g., score format) correlate more strongly than benchmarks with the same assigned concept. Finally, some individual benchmarks correlate more strongly with benchmarks assigned a different concept than with benchmarks sharing their own assigned concept, suggesting they may measure a different concept than they purport to. For example, BBQ-accuracy correlates more strongly with benchmarks labeled reasoning than with benchmarks that share its assigned concept, bias. To support future empirical work on benchmark validity, we release our extensive dataset of model outputs and scores at the item- and benchmark-level.

cs.CY↗

The Audit Decides the Verdict: Instrument Effects Rival Demographic Bias in LLM Decision Audits

Whether a language model looks demographically biased can depend on how the audit asks its question. A charitable-aid benchmark reports that the same models favor minority applicants when rating requests one at a time and penalize some when ranking side by side. We test whether that reversal generalizes to hiring, lending, and medical triage: 40,726 requests to five models, applications differing only in the applicant's name, and a primary test fixed before collection. It does not. None of 36 planned contrasts survives correction. The rating advantage keeps its sign at roughly half the published size, and a precision extension bounds any hiring ranking penalty below the published effect, though the lending and triage ranking floors sit above that margin, so the exclusion is conclusive for hiring ranking and for rating in all three domains only. Planted disparities tracking their injected sizes and a directional replication on the original aid materials bound these nulls. The audit is livelier than the demographics: models recognize transparent audits nearly always, tie every identical-content comparison whether the varying detail is race or a hobby, and reward first-listed candidates as much as any demographic effect we measure. Audit verdicts reflect audit construction more than demographic bias.

cs.CL↗

Playing Whack-a-Mole with misconceptions about memorization, extraction, and copyright

After careful review, I'm confident the headline fine-tuning memorization results in Alignment Whack-a-Mole use an invalid measurement procedure. The book memorization coverage metric these headline results depend on counts sequence matches far shorter than what field standards consider valid evidence of memorization, and the prompting procedure used to elicit memorization runs the risk of leaking the text being "extracted" in the prompt. The paper doesn't include the negative-control experiments needed to see how much the results are inflated by false positives: claiming extraction success (and therefore memorization of training data) when matches between generations and training data may be due to other factors. Given these validity issues, the paper's claims that fine-tuning lets users extract substantial portions of copyrighted books, in a form that could substitute for the originals, aren't supported by the reported results. The failure to report the experiments' cost (an important component of the threat model) further compromises the copyright claims. I'm writing this note because, in the last month, (prospective) plaintiffs have reached out to me to ask about this paper. They're looking to cite this work as valid evidence in support of claims in ongoing and potential future copyright litigation.

cs.CY↗

Endorsement Without New Evidence: How Sequential Voting Inflates Mandates in Online Community Governance

Online communities often treat large support margins in public elections as strong mandates. We argue that such margins can overstate the independent scrutiny behind a decision. Using 198,275 free-text rationales from Wikipedia admin elections, we introduce vote-text divergence, a measure that flags a decisive vote paired with a thin, deferential rationale. Divergence rises as voters arrive later, even after controlling for voter and election fixed effects. The pattern is consistent with information saturation: once prior text is accounted for, arrival order no longer predicts divergence, while accumulated prior evidence does. The effect is strongest among peripheral voters in the co-voting network. Yet divergence does not predict worse post-promotion outcomes, such as administrative activity or survival. Public tallies can therefore weaken the scrutiny signal even while selecting capable administrators: a margin may appear to reflect more consensus and support than it actually contains.

cs.SI↗

Ephemeral Feeds and Enduring Rituals: RushTok and the Formation of Event-Based Algorithmic Communities

Each August, TikTok's For You page turns the University of Alabama's sorority recruitment into RushTok. We examine RushTok as an event-based algorithmic community: a collective assembled around a bounded offline ritual and sustained by recommendation. Using a mixed-methods survey (n=71) and a reflexive account of creator outreach, we ask who participates, how, and with what stakes. Findings show an ambiguous and entertainment based throughline; many called it a community (51/71) but few claimed membership (11/71). Affiliation centered on creators rather than shared practices, with parasocial attention clustering around a small set of potential new members (PNMs) and returning figures. Higher content exposure tracked with self-identification as a community member; those members commented, followed creators, and engaged across videos. Attempts to interview creators were met with silence or refusals, reflecting community boundary-work despite viral visibility. We outline implications for platform governance, including time-bounded context, graduated visibility, and aftercare.

cs.HC↗

Auditable Emergency Triage for Maternal and Newborn Care in India

At Noora Health, our nurses answer more than 50,000 medical queries per month on our WhatsApp-based service that provides caregivers with on-demand support. Their most time-critical task is emergency triage: deciding which queries need immediate in-person attention. To support them, we built a system that uses a large language model (LLM) to classify whether a message is an emergency and provide a rationale for interpretability. But the system was opaque: analyzing mistakes meant reading reasoning chains for each message, which is infeasible at our scale. Prompt changes meant re-running a full evaluation to prevent regressions, which was both costly and operationally challenging. Clinicians follow a decision tree to make this call, but it was never documented or passed to the model, which relied on a flat list of danger signs. To address these issues, we decomposed triage into two steps: an LLM extracts canonical symptoms and patient context from the query using a clinician-authored vocabulary, and a deterministic rule engine captures the scenarios that indicate an emergency. We show that the new system raised recall from 0.565 to 0.810 and F1 from 0.606 to 0.702, with structured rules driving most of the accuracy gains while the decomposition provides auditability: clinical experts can inspect each stage of the new system to see whether the query was mistranslated, symptoms were incorrectly extracted, patient context was wrongly inferred, or the necessary rules were missing. They can add new rules independently without causing regressions and avoid running costly evaluations. Since deployment, the new system has triaged 152,421 patient queries and flagged 28,535 (18.7%) as emergencies. The over-escalation rate has been 17.8%, without any increase in missed emergencies. Clinicians have also added 48 new rules since deployment, evidence of the faster correction loop we set out to build.

cs.CL↗

The Mutations of Machine Speech

Algorithmic outputs now populate the digital environments through which contemporary life is organized. The role of law in facilitating and constituting (rather than merely responding to) these processes is gaining increasing traction across scholarly accounts. This inquiry traces the evolution of algorithmic outputs attending to their legal underpinnings and social implications, surfacing the mutations of machine speech. The first mutation redefined speech as data to be queried: search engines transformed the web from a space of information retrieval into an economic regime of algorithmic visibility. The second mutation reframed speech as engagement: social media platforms fused moderation with amplification, turning expression into a metric of attention, governed by corporate architectures. The third mutation emerges in conversational systems and interfaces, where generative text displaces information retrieval, bringing with it dense technolegal entanglements and profound epistemic consequences. Scholars of freedom of expression, informational privacy, and communication studies have long grappled with these dynamics, yet their implications for broader legal thought have also become urgent. This piece seeks to organize and clarify the evolving debate around algorithmic speech, making this critical but often fragmented discourse more accessible to wider legal and interdisciplinary audiences. In doing so, it bridges the gap between observing technological transformation and critically assessing the constitutive role of law within it, offering a conceptual resource for researchers, students, policymakers, and practitioners navigating and contesting this evolving landscape.

cs.CL↗

Democracy Needs Reach: Political Equality, Online Speech, and Algorithmic Recommendation

Within democracies, the capacity to influence political outcomes through speech depends not only on the right to express oneself, but also on the opportunity to reach relevant audiences. In this paper, I argue that the unequal distribution of algorithmic reach on social media platforms undermines equality of opportunity for political influence (EOPI), which is a central democratic ideal. Drawing on Niko Kolodny's work, I contend that current recommendation algorithms create and perpetuate informal inequalities by concentrating attention among a small minority of already-amplified speakers while systematically marginalizing others. To address this problem, I propose recommendation floors as a mechanism for equalizing political speech. To help users achieve meaningful participation, each verified account would receive guaranteed minimum recommendation for up to a limited number of political posts per week. Although this measure represents one component of the structural reforms needed to move the digital public sphere closer to democratic ideals, it offers a feasible pathway to reducing informal inequalities in political influence online.

cs.CY↗

Applying foundation model embeddings towards urban livability evaluation

While accurate measurement of socioeconomic indicators remains challenging in data-scarce regions, which limits policy interventions and resource allocation, high-resolution geospatial data is widely available and can contain information on various livability statistics. We investigate which physical features are encoded within foundation model embeddings, such as AlphaEarth, AnySat, and TerraMind, and provide a systematic framework for identifying the most predictive geospatial indicators. By analyzing how different types of geospatial data influence urban livability predictions, our approach enables researchers to prioritize the most informative features for their specific applications. Additionally, we demonstrate how to leverage foundation model embeddings to enhance prediction performance for these outcomes. This work contributes a principled methodology for extracting actionable information from satellite imagery while accounting for complex spatial dependencies, with applications in predicting urban livability in regions with limited observation data.

cs.LG↗

Redesigning Service Level Agreements: Equity and Efficiency in City Government Operations

We study how government should allocate resources (e.g., maintenance of public infrastructure) over time, efficiently and equitably -- when these desiderata may conflict. In particular, we consider the design of Service Level Agreements (SLAs) in city government operations: promises that incidents such as potholes and fallen trees will be responded to within a certain time. We model the problem of designing a set of SLAs as an optimization problem with equity and efficiency objectives under a queueing framework; the city has two decision levers: how to allocate response budgets to different neighborhoods, and how to schedule responses to individual incidents. We first theoretically analyze a stylized model, deriving when the equity-efficiency trade-off is substantial in absolute terms and centralizing response efforts leads to relatively smaller improvements over optimal decentralized operations. We then develop a simulation-optimization framework to design and analyze policies in practice. Applying our framework to data from NYC, we find: (a) in practice, despite large potential trade-offs, equity improvements are possible with relatively small decreases in efficiency; (b) there exist policies that are both more efficient and equitable than status quo inspections; (c) the gain from centralization is {relatively small compared to the potential efficiency-equity tradeoff}. Our results provide widely applicable predictions about the scale of the equity-efficiency trade-off in similar resource allocation settings, and our data-driven simulation-optimization framework enables specific policy recommendations in government operations. Our code is available at https://github.com/nikhgarg/sla_design. Our theoretical statements have been formalized in Lean, available at https://github.com/nikhgarg/AppliedModelingLib/blob/main/papers/LG24ServiceLevelAgreements/.

cs.CY↗

Emergence of polarization in networks of large language model agents

Rapid advances in large language models (LLMs) have not only empowered autonomous agents to generate social networks, communicate, and form shared and diverging opinions on political issues, but have also begun to play a growing role in shaping human political deliberation. Our understanding of their collective behaviours and underlying mechanisms remains incomplete, however, posing unexpected risks to human society. In this paper, we simulate networked systems involving thousands of LLM agents across different backbone models (GPT-3.5, GPT-4o, ChatGLM, Llama-3, and DeepSeek-V3), in which agents interact through LLM-guided conversations and update their opinions over time, resulting in the emergence of opinion polarization. We discover that these agents spontaneously develop their own social network with properties characteristic of human social networks, including homophilic clustering. The collective opinions of these LLM agents evolve in ways that exhibit behavioural patterns consistent with social phenomena and mechanisms widely discussed in studies of human behaviour. Overall, these behaviours, patterns, and emergent phenomena produced by LLM agents are consistent with real-world observations and established opinion-dynamics models. This consistency suggests that LLM agents can serve as a valuable synthetic testbed for exploring hypothetical intervention strategies in networked LLM-agent systems.

cs.SI↗