Publication history of von Staudt's Geometrie der Lage
From a census of forty copies, we can distinguish three different editions of von Staudt's Geometrie der Lage: the first of 1847 and two undated ones from the 1870's.
math.HO↗
SEARCH · Searcharxiv
Results for “math.HO”
Search indexed arXiv papers on artificial intelligence, large language models, computer vision and robotics. Read source abstracts and follow links to arXiv.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
L.V.Kantorovich and Linear Programming
I want to write about what I know and remember about the activities of Leonid Vital'evich Kantorovich, an outstanding scientist of the 20th century; about his dramatic struggle for recognition of his mathematical economic theories; about the initial stage of the history of linear programming; about beautuful Kantorovich metric, about the creation of a new area of mathematical activity related to economic applications, which is called sometimes operation research, sometimes mathematical economics, sometimes linear and convex programming, or economic cybernetics, etc.; about its place in the modern mathematical landscape; and, finally, about several personal impressions of this distinguished scientist. The notes in no way pretend to exhaust these topics.
math.HO↗
A geometrical link between the circle and sexagesimal system
This paper presents a simple geometrical fact which could relate to the history of mathematics and astronomy. This fact shows a natural link between the circle and the multiples of 6 and it makes it possible to obtain a simple representation of the 12 months of the year, the 24 hours of the day, the 30 days (average number) of the month and the 360 days (approximate number) of the year, which brings us closer to the sexagesimal division of time. Moreover this representation reminds one of the movement of the planets around a centre. Using this fact one will be able also to find geometrically the principal divisor of number 60, to represent numbers in base 60 with a kind of abacus or calculation table and to make a division of the circle into 6 and 12 equal parts. Afterwards one will be able to obtain a division in 360 unequal parts but relatively close to one another, and the goal isn't precisely to obtain an optimal division of the circle in 360 equal parts but to prove that the idea to divide the circle in 360 equal parts can subsequently be suggested by these geometrical facts that have been showed. In this article the author will not answer the following questions: a) What is the origin of the sexagesimal system? b) By which way could one manage to adopt the sexagesimal system starting from the knowledge of the facts exposed in this article and starting from the knowledge of the astronomical data? These questions could be treated, using information of this article, by the readers or later on by the author.
math.HO↗
A double demonstration of a theorem of Newton, which gives a relation between the coefficient of an algebraic equation and the sums of the powers of its roots
Translation from the Latin original, "Demonstratio gemina theorematis Neutoniani, quo traditur relatio inter coefficientes cuiusvis aequationis algebraicae et summas potestatum radicum eiusdem" (1747). E153 in the Enestrom index. In this paper Euler gives two proofs of Newton's identities, which express the sums of powers of the roots of a polynomial in terms of its coefficients. The first proof takes the derivative of a logarithm. The second proof uses induction and the fact that in a polynomial of degree $n$, the coefficient of $x^{n-k}$ is equal to the sum of the products of $k$ roots, times $(-1)^k$.
math.HO↗
Sylvester's Minorant Criterion, Lagrange-Beltrami Identity, and Nonnegative Definiteness
We consider the characterizations of positive definite as well as nonnegative definite quadratic forms in terms of the principal minors of the associated symmetric matrix. We briefly review some of the known proofs, including a classical approach via the Lagrange-Beltrami identity. For quadratic forms in up to 3 variables, we give an elementary and self-contained proof of Sylvester's Criterion for positive definiteness as well as for nonnegative definiteness. In the process, we obtain an explicit version of Lagrange-Beltrami identity for ternary quadratic forms.
math.HO↗
Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras and the J-homomorphism
Let X be a topological space. The homology of the iterated loop space $H_*Ω^n X$ is an algebra over the homology of the framed n-disks operad $H_*f\mathcal{D}_n$ \cite{Getzler:BVAlg,Salvatore-Wahl:FrameddoBVa}. We determine completely this $H_*f\mathcal{D}_n$-algebra structure on $H_*(Ω^n X;\mathbb{Q})$. We show that the action of $H_*(SO(n))$ on the iterated loop space $H_*Ω^n X$ is related to the J-homomorphism and that the BV-operator vanishes on spherical classes only in characteristic other than 2.
math.AT↗
Complex cobordism and algebraic topology
This is a historical survey, beginning where Atiyah and Sullivan leave off...
math.HO↗
Origin of the numerals, Al biruni testimony
The origin of the numerals that we inherited from the arabo-Islamic civilization remained one enigma. The hypothesis of the Indian origin remained, with controversies, without serious rival. It was the dominant hypothesis since more of one century. Its partisans found to it and constructed a lot of arguments. The testimonies of the medieval authors have been interpreted to its advantage. The opposite opinions have been dismissed and ignored. An amalgam between the history of our modern numerals and the Indian mathematics history is made. Rational contradictions often passed under silence. A meticulous observation of the numerals permits to affirm that our numerals are in fact more or less modified Arabic letters. The "Ghubari" shape of the numerals shows that the symbol of a numeral corresponds to the Arabic letter whose numerical value is equal to this numeral. The numerals don't have a simple resemblance with some Arabic letters, but every number looks like the Arabic letter whose numerical value is equal to this numeral. The elements of the ''Abjadi'' calculation gives us a theoretical support, independent of the letters and numerals, witch explains our observation. Besides a re-lecture of the testimonies of the medieval authors, particularly the testimony of Al-Biruni, that is probably at the origin of all others testimonies speaking of the Indian origin of the numerals, is in agreement with the fact that our numerals are Arabic letters. We have there a second way concerning the origin of our modern numerals that is only to its beginnings. The deepened researches are necessary to understand the history of our numerals better. A rigorous re-lecture of the medieval testimonies with a new mind imposes itself.
math.HO↗
Origin of the numerals, Zero concept
The partisans of the hypothesis of the Indian origin of the numerals create confusion between the history of the Indian mathematics and the history of our modern numerals. To argue the thesis of the Indian origin of the numbers they confound between: the "intuitive zero " of Brahmagupta, that means ''nothing'' and which is the difference of two equal numbers, the "numeral zero" used in the representation of the numbers and the "mathematical zero" defined by the modern mathematicians. "Sifr" designate the "numeral zero" and "Shunya" designate the "intuitive zero". The word "Sifr" is not a traduction of the word "Shunya" and does not derive from the Indian word "Shunya", since the word "Sifr" and its derivatives existed in Arabic long before the appearance of zero itself The facts that the "intuitive zero" and the "mathematical zero" are represented currently by the "numerals zero" symbol "0" are only consequences of the representation of the numbers by the "Ghubari" numerals
math.HO↗
On Categorical Theory-Building: Beyond the Formal
I propose a notion of theory motivated by Category theory.
math.HO↗
Teaching the Kepler laws for freshmen
We present a natural proof of Kepler's law of ellipses in the spirit of Euclidean geometry. Moreover we discuss two existing Euclidean geometric proofs, one by Feynman in hist Lost Lecture from 1964 and the other by Newton in the Principia of 1687.
math.SG↗
On the sum of the series formed from the prime numbers where the prime numbers of the form $4n-1$ have a positive sign and those of the form $4n+1$ a negative sign
This is an English translation of the Latin original "De summa seriei ex numeris primis formatae ${1/3}-{1/5}+{1/7}+{1/11}-{1/13}-{1/17}+{1/19}+{1/23}-{1/29}+{1/31}-$ etc. ubi numeri primi formae $4n-1$ habent signum positivum formae autem $4n+1$ signum negativum" (1775). E596 in the Enestrom index. Let $χ$ be the nontrivial character modulo 4. Euler wants to know what $\sum_p χ(p)/p$ is, either an exact expression or an approximation. He looks for analogies to the harmonic series and the series of reciprocals of the primes. Another reason he is interested in this is that if this series has a finite value (which is does, the best approximation Euler gets is 0.3349816 in section 27) then there are infinitely many primes congruent to 1 mod 4 and infinitely many primes congruent to 3 mod 4. In section 15 Euler gives the Euler product for the L(chi,1). As a modern mathematical appendix appendix, I have written a proof following Davenport that the series $\sum_p \frac{χ(p)}{p}$ converges. This involves applications of summation by parts, and uses Chebyshev's estimate for the second Chebyshev function (summing the von Mangoldt function).
math.HO↗
Sharpness of the Finsler-Hadwiger inequality
In this paper we shall prove a sharpened version of the Finsler-Hadwiger inequality which is a strong generalization of Weitzenbock inequality. After that we give another refinement of this inequality and in the final part we provide some basic applications.
math.MG↗
Cesaro's integral formula for the Bell numbers (corrected)
M. E. Cesaro (1885) gave a quite remarkable expression for the Bell number --the number of partitions of an n-element set -- as a definite integral. This note is an exposition, correcting a typographical error in the original.
math.HO↗
Limits of zeros of polynomial sequences
In the present paper we consider $F_k(x)=x^{k}-\sum_{t=0}^{k-1}x^t,$ the characteristic polynomial of the $k$-th order Fibonacci sequence, the latter denoted $G(k,l).$ We determine the limits of the real roots of certain odd and even degree polynomials related to the derivatives and integrals of $F_k(x),$ that form infinite sequences of polynomials, of increasing degree. In particular, as $k \to \infty,$ the limiting values of the zeros are determined, for both odd and even cases. It is also shown, in both cases, that the convergence is monotone for sufficiently large degree. We give an upper bound for the modulus of the complex zeros of the polynomials for each sequence. This gives a general solution related to problems considered by Dubeau 1989, 1993, Miles 1960, Flores 1967, Miller 1971 and later by the second author in the present paper, and Narayan 1997.
math.CA↗
General observations on series whose terms proceed as the sines and cosines of multiples of angles
Translated from the Latin original, "Observationes generales circa series, quarum termini secundum sinus vel cosinus angulorum multiplorum progrediuntur" (1777). E655 in the Enestrom index. Euler looks at the binomial expansion $(1+x)^n$ for $x=\cos ϕ+i\sinϕ$. He does $n=$ positive and negative integers, and $n={1/2}, -{1/2}$, and particular values of $ϕ$.
math.HO↗
Which Partial Sums of the Taylor Series for $e$ are Convergents to $e$? (and a Link to the Primes 2, 5, 13, 37, 463), II
This is an expanded version of our earlier paper. Let the $n$th partial sum of the Taylor series $e = \sum_{r=0}^{\infty} 1/r!$ be $A_n/n!$, and let $p_k/q_k$ be the $k$th convergent of the simple continued fraction for $e$. Using a recent measure of irrationality for $e$, we prove weak versions of our conjecture that only two of the partial sums are convergents to $e$. A related result about the denominators $q_k$ and powers of factorials is proved. We also show a surprising connection between the $A_n$ and the primes 2, 5, 13, 37, 463. In the Appendix, we give a conditional proof of the conjecture, assuming a second conjecture we make about the zeros of $A_n$ and $q_k$ modulo powers of 2. Tables supporting this Zeros Conjecture are presented and we discuss a 2-adic reformulation of it.
math.NT↗