Searcharxiv⌕ Search

SEARCH · Searcharxiv

Results for “q-fin.RM”

Search indexed arXiv papers on artificial intelligence, large language models, computer vision and robotics. Read source abstracts and follow links to arXiv.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Completing CVA and Liquidity: Firm-Level Positions and Collateralized Trades

Bilateral CVA as currently implement has the counterintuitive effect of profiting from one's own widening CDS spreads, i.e. increased risk of default, in practice. The unified picture of CVA and liquidity introduced by Morini & Prampolini 2010 has contributed to understanding this. However, there are two significant omissions for practical implementation that come from the same source, i.e. positions not booked in usual position-keeping systems. The first omission is firm-level positions that change value upon firm default. An example is Goodwill which is a line item on balance sheets and typically written down to zero on default. Another example would be firm Equity. The second omission relates to collateralized positions. When these positions are out of the money in future, which has a positive probability, they will require funding that cannot be secured using the position itself. These contingent future funding positions are usually not booked in any position-keeping system. We show here how to include these two types of positions and thus help to complete the unified picture of CVA and liquidity. For a particular large complex financial institution that profited $2.5B from spread widening we show that including Goodwill would have resulted in a $4B loss under conservative assumptions. Whilst we cannot make a similar assessment for its collateralized derivative portfolio we calculate both the funding costs and the CVA from own default for a range of swaps and find that CVA was a positive contribution in the examples.

q-fin.PR↗

Scaling portfolio volatility and calculating risk contributions in the presence of serial cross-correlations

In practice daily volatility of portfolio returns is transformed to longer holding periods by multiplying by the square-root of time which assumes that returns are not serially correlated. Under this assumption this procedure of scaling can also be applied to contributions to volatility of the assets in the portfolio. Close prices are often used to calculate the profit and loss of a portfolio. Trading at exchanges located in distant time zones this can lead to significant serial cross-correlations of the closing-time returns of the assets in the portfolio. These serial correlations cause the square-root-of-time rule to fail. Moreover volatility contributions in this setting turn out to be misleading due to non-synchronous correlations. We address this issue and provide alternative procedures for scaling volatility and calculating risk contributions for arbitrary holding periods.

q-fin.RM↗

Liquidity-adjusted Market Risk Measures with Stochastic Holding Period

Within the context of risk integration, we introduce in risk measurement stochastic holding period (SHP) models. This is done in order to obtain a `liquidity-adjusted risk measure' characterized by the absence of a fixed time horizon. The underlying assumption is that - due to changes on market liquidity conditions - one operates along an `operational time' to which the P&L process of liquidating a market portfolio is referred. This framework leads to a mixture of distributions for the portfolio returns, potentially allowing for skewness, heavy tails and extreme scenarios. We analyze the impact of possible distributional choices for the SHP. In a multivariate setting, we hint at the possible introduction of dependent SHP processes, which potentially lead to non linear dependence among the P&L processes and therefore to tail dependence across assets in the portfolio, although this may require drastic choices on the SHP distributions. We also find that increasing dependence as measured by Kendall's tau through common SHP's appears to be unfeasible. We finally discuss potential developments following future availability of market data.

q-fin.RM↗

About the Justification of Experience Rating: Bonus Malus System and a new Poisson Mixture Model

The claim experience of the past is a very important information to calculate the fair price of an insurance contract. In a lot of European countries for instance the prices for motor car insurance depend on the number of claims the driver has reported to the insurance company during the last years. Classically these prices are calculated on the basis of a mixed Poisson model with a gamma mixing distribution. The mixing distribution models the car drivers' qualities across the insured portfolio. This is just one example for experience rating. In the classical context the price is equal to the expectation of the Bayesian posterior distribution. In some lines of business (especially third party liability and lines with exposure to extreme weather events) we that the real world data cannot be described well enough by the classical Poisson - gamma model. Therefore we investigate the influence of the mixing distribution on the posterior distribution conditional on the experienced number of claims. This enables the application of other - more risk adequate premium principles than the expectation principle. We introduce the inverse - gamma distribution as a new mixing distribution to model claim numbers and compare it to the classical gamma distribution. In both cases a closed analytic representation of the mixed distribution can be found: In the classic case the well known negative binomial distribution, in our new one a representation using the Bessel functions. Additionally we present numerical results about the tail behaviour of the mixed Poisson - inverse - gamma distribution. Finally we introduce the concept of resolution. It enables us to decide if the classification of risk groups via the number of experienced claims is a risk adequate procedure.

q-fin.RM↗

On the Savety Loading for Chain Ladder Estimates: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study

A method for analysing the risk of taking a too low reserve level by use of Chain Ladder method is developed. We give an answer to the question of how much safety loading in terms of the Chain Ladder standard error has to be added to the Chain Ladder reserve in order to reach a specified security level in loss reserving. This is an important question in the framework of integrated risk management of an insurance company. Furthermore we investigate the relative bias of Chain Ladder estimators. We use Monte Carlo simulation technique as well as the collective model of risk theory in each cell of run-off table. We analyse deviation between Chain Ladder reserves and Monte Carlo simulated reserves statistically. Our results document dependency on claim number and claim size distribution types and parameters.

q-fin.RM↗

A three dimensional stochastic Model for Claim Reserving

Within the Solvency II framework the insurance industry requires a realistic modelling of the risk processes relevant for its business. Every insurance company should be capable of running a holistic risk management process to meet this challenge. For property and casualty (P&C) insurance companies the risk adequate modelling of the claim reserves is a very important topic as this liabilities determine up to 70% percent of the balance sum. We propose a three dimensional (3D) stochastic model for claim reserving. It delivers consistently the reserve's distribution function as well as the distributions of all parts of it that are needed for accounting and controlling. The calibration methods for the model are well known from data analysis and they are applicable in an practitioner environment. We evaluate the model numerically by the help of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. Classical actuarial reserve models are two dimensional (2D). They lead to an estimation algorithm that is applied on a 2D matrix, the run off triangle. Those methods (for instance the Chain - Ladder or the Bornhuetter - Ferguson method) are widely used in practice nowadays and give rise to several problems: They estimate the reserves' expectation and some of them - under very restriction assumptions - the variance. They provide no information about the tail of the reserve's distribution, what would be most important for risk calculation, for assessing the insurance company's financial stability and economic situation. Additionally, due to the projection of the claim process into a two dimensional space the results are very often distorted and dependent on the kind of projection. Therefore we extend the classical 2D models to a 3D space because we find inconsistencies generated by inadequate projections into the 2D spaces.

q-fin.RM↗

Capital allocation for credit portfolios under normal and stressed market conditions

If the probability of default parameters (PDs) fed as input into a credit portfolio model are estimated as through-the-cycle (TTC) PDs stressed market conditions have little impact on the results of the capital calculations conducted with the model. At first glance, this is totally different if the PDs are estimated as point-in-time (PIT) PDs. However, it can be argued that the reflection of stressed market conditions in input PDs should correspond to the use of reduced correlation parameters or even the removal of correlations in the model. Additionally, the confidence levels applied for the capital calculations might be made reflective of the changing market conditions. We investigate the interplay of PIT PDs, correlations, and confidence levels in a credit portfolio model in more detail and analyse possible designs of capital-levelling policies. Our findings may of interest to banks that want to combine their approaches to capital measurement and allocation with active portfolio management that, by its nature, needs to be reflective of current market conditions.

q-fin.RM↗

An Efficient, Distributable, Risk Neutral Framework for CVA Calculation

The importance of counterparty credit risk to the derivative contracts was demonstrated consistently throughout the financial crisis of 2008. Accurate valuation of Credit value adjustment (CVA) is essential to reflect the economic values of these risks. In the present article, we reviewed several different approaches for calculating CVA, and compared the advantage and disadvantage for each method. We also introduced an more efficient and scalable computational framework for this calculation.

q-fin.CP↗

A time before which insiders would not undertake risk

A continuous-path semimartingale market model with wealth processes discounted by a riskless asset is considered. The numeraire portfolio is the unique strictly positive wealth process that, when used as a benchmark to denominate all other wealth, makes all wealth processes local martingales. It is assumed that the numeraire portfolio exists and that its wealth increases to infinity as time goes to infinity. Under this setting, an initial enlargement of the filtration is performed, by including the overall minimum of the numeraire portfolio. It is established that all nonnegative wealth processes, when stopped at the time of the overall minimum of the numeraire portfolio, become local martingales in the enlarged filtration. This implies that risk-averse insider traders would refrain from investing in the risky assets before that time. A partial converse to the previous result is also established in the case of complete markets, showing that the time of the overall minimum of the numeraire portfolio is in a certain sense unique in rendering undesirable the act of undertaking risky positions before it. The aforementioned results shed light to the importance of the numeraire portfolio as an indicator of overall market performance.

q-fin.PM↗

Hermitian and non-Hermitian covariance estimators for multivariate Gaussian and non-Gaussian assets from random matrix theory

The random matrix theory method of planar Gaussian diagrammatic expansion is applied to find the mean spectral density of the Hermitian equal-time and non-Hermitian time-lagged cross-covariance estimators, firstly in the form of master equations for the most general multivariate Gaussian system, secondly for seven particular toy models of the true covariance function. For the simplest one of these models, the existing result is shown to be incorrect and the right one is presented, moreover its generalizations are accomplished to the exponentially-weighted moving average estimator as well as two non-Gaussian distributions, Student t and free Levy. The paper revolves around applications to financial complex systems, and the results constitute a sensitive probe of the true correlations present there.

q-fin.ST↗

Dynamic Coherent Acceptability Indices and their Applications to Finance

In this paper we present a theoretical framework for studying coherent acceptability indices in a dynamic setup. We study dynamic coherent acceptability indices and dynamic coherent risk measures, and we establish a duality between them. We derive a representation theorem for dynamic coherent risk measures in terms of so called dynamically consistent sequence of sets of probability measures. Based on these results, we give a specific construction of dynamic coherent acceptability indices. We also provide examples of dynamic coherent acceptability indices, both abstract and also some that generalize selected classical financial measures of portfolio performance.

q-fin.RM↗

Impact of Insurance for Operational Risk: Is it worthwhile to insure or be insured for severe losses?

Under the Basel II standards, the Operational Risk (OpRisk) advanced measurement approach allows a provision for reduction of capital as a result of insurance mitigation of up to 20%. This paper studies the behaviour of different insurance policies in the context of capital reduction for a range of possible extreme loss models and insurance policy scenarios in a multi-period, multiple risk settings. A Loss Distributional Approach (LDA) for modelling of the annual loss process, involving homogeneous compound Poisson processes for the annual losses, with heavy tailed severity models comprised of alpha-stable severities is considered. There has been little analysis of such models to date and it is believed, insurance models will play more of a role in OpRisk mitigation and capital reduction in future. The first question of interest is when would it be equitable for a bank or financial institution to purchase insurance for heavy tailed OpRisk losses under different insurance policy scenarios? The second question then pertains to Solvency II and addresses what the insurers capital would be for such operational risk scenarios under different policy offerings. In addition we consider the insurers perspective with respect to fair premium as a percentage above the expected annual claim for each insurance policy. The intention being to address questions related to VaR reduction under Basel II, SCR under Solvency II and fair insurance premiums in OpRisk for different extreme loss scenarios. In the process we provide closed form solutions for the distribution of loss process and claims process in an LDA structure as well as closed form analytic solutions for the Expected Shortfall, SCR and MCR under Basel II and Solvency II. We also provide closed form analytic solutions for the annual loss distribution of multiple risks including insurance mitigation.

q-fin.RM↗

Ordering of multivariate probability distributions with respect to extreme portfolio losses

A new notion of stochastic ordering is introduced to compare multivariate stochastic risk models with respect to extreme portfolio losses. In the framework of multivariate regular variation comparison criteria are derived in terms of ordering conditions on the spectral measures, which allows for analytical or numerical verification in practical applications. Additional comparison criteria in terms of further stochastic orderings are derived. The application examples include worst case and best case scenarios, elliptically contoured distributions, and multivariate regularly varying models with Gumbel, Archimedean, and Galambos copulas.

q-fin.RM↗

Quantile hedging for basket derivatives

The problem of quantile hedging for basket derivatives in the Black-Scholes model with correlation is considered. Explicit formulas for the probability maximizing function and the cost reduction function are derived. Applicability of the results for the widely traded derivatives as digital, quantos, outperformance and spread options is shown.

q-fin.RM↗

Hedging Pure Endowments with Mortality Derivatives

In recent years, a market for mortality derivatives began developing as a way to handle systematic mortality risk, which is inherent in life insurance and annuity contracts. Systematic mortality risk is due to the uncertain development of future mortality intensities, or {\it hazard rates}. In this paper, we develop a theory for pricing pure endowments when hedging with a mortality forward is allowed. The hazard rate associated with the pure endowment and the reference hazard rate for the mortality forward are correlated and are modeled by diffusion processes. We price the pure endowment by assuming that the issuing company hedges its contract with the mortality forward and requires compensation for the unhedgeable part of the mortality risk in the form of a pre-specified instantaneous Sharpe ratio. The major result of this paper is that the value per contract solves a linear partial differential equation as the number of contracts approaches infinity. One can represent the limiting price as an expectation under an equivalent martingale measure. Another important result is that hedging with the mortality forward may raise or lower the price of this pure endowment comparing to its price without hedging, as determined in Bayraktar et al. [2009]. The market price of the reference mortality risk and the correlation between the two portfolios jointly determine the cost of hedging. We demonstrate our results using numerical examples.

q-fin.PR↗

Ruin probability in the presence of risky investments

We consider an insurance company in the case when the premium rate is a bounded non-negative random function $c_\zs{t}$ and the capital of the insurance company is invested in a risky asset whose price follows a geometric Brownian motion with mean return $a$ and volatility $σ>0$. If $β:=2a/σ^2-1>0$ we find exact the asymptotic upper and lower bounds for the ruin probability $Ψ(u)$ as the initial endowment $u$ tends to infinity, i.e. we show that $C_*u^{-β}\leΨ(u)\le C^*u^{-β}$ for sufficiently large $u$. Moreover if $c_\zs{t}=c^*e^{γt}$ with $γ\le 0$ we find the exact asymptotics of the ruin probability, namely $Ψ(u)\sim u^{-β}$. If $β\le 0$, we show that $Ψ(u)=1$ for any $u\ge 0$.

q-fin.RM↗

Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of default and recovery: dependent via the latent systematic factor

It is a well known fact that recovery rates tend to go down when the number of defaults goes up in economic downturns. We demonstrate how the loss given default model with the default and recovery dependent via the latent systematic risk factor can be estimated using Bayesian inference methodology and Markov chain Monte Carlo method. This approach is very convenient for joint estimation of all model parameters and latent systematic factors. Moreover, all relevant uncertainties are easily quantified. Typically available data are annual averages of defaults and recoveries and thus the datasets are small and parameter uncertainty is significant. In this case Bayesian approach is superior to the maximum likelihood method that relies on a large sample limit Gaussian approximation for the parameter uncertainty. As an example, we consider a homogeneous portfolio with one latent factor. However, the approach can be easily extended to deal with non-homogenous portfolios and several latent factors.

q-fin.RM↗

Superhedging and Dynamic Risk Measures under Volatility Uncertainty

We consider dynamic sublinear expectations (i.e., time-consistent coherent risk measures) whose scenario sets consist of singular measures corresponding to a general form of volatility uncertainty. We derive a càdlàg nonlinear martingale which is also the value process of a superhedging problem. The superhedging strategy is obtained from a representation similar to the optional decomposition. Furthermore, we prove an optional sampling theorem for the nonlinear martingale and characterize it as the solution of a second order backward SDE. The uniqueness of dynamic extensions of static sublinear expectations is also studied.

q-fin.RM↗