Searcharxiv⌕ Search

FIND YOUR NEXT DISCOVERY

Results for “cs.CL”

Original records, connected by a shared subject.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2,600 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Informational Antilocality and the Locality Bias in LLMs

We consider the ability of transformer-based language models (LLMs) to learn what we call k-antilocal languages, i.e., languages that have no mutual information across any span of $k$ contiguous symbols. We construct such languages with increasing $k$, finding that LLMs trained on them achieve comparable cross-entropy loss regardless of antilocality, but converge more slowly on more antilocal languages. Our findings support the idea that non-local dependencies are more difficult to learn, but the evidence for this bias comes from learning speed rather than learning success.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Sleight of Word Benchmark: Can Language Models Notice If Their Own Output Was Tampered With?

The output of a Language Model can be tampered with \emph{while} the model is writing it. A simple test can thus be constructed by evaluating the model's perception of this external perturbation. In this spirit, a simple benchmark is built in which a single word is consistently substituted with another in the generation process. We call this method \emph{Sleight of Word}. Two distinct axes are measured: metrics that relate to the model's surprise, as well as an evaluation of the textual reaction for 19 different open-weight language models.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Do LLM Agents Mirror Socio-Cognitive Effects in Power-Asymmetric Conversations?

Power differences shape human communication through well documented socio cognitive effects, including language coordination, pronoun usage, authority bias, and harmful compliance. We examine whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar behaviors when assigned high or low status personas. Using personas from diverse professions, we simulate multi turn, power asymmetric dialogues (e.g., principal teacher, justice lawyer) and measure (i) language coordination, (ii) pronoun usage, (iii) persuasion success, and (iv) compliance with unsafe requests. Our results show that LLMs show key socio-cognitive effects of power, albeit with nuances and variability, linking simulated interactions to both desirable and unsafe behaviors.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Leveraging Turn-taking Dynamics for Intent Recognition in Multi-party Conversations

We propose a multi-task learning approach for multi-party dialogue intent recognition that leverages an auxiliary task that models turn-taking dynamics. Specifically, we introduce turn-transition entropy, a self-supervised target computed from the sequence of speaker transitions, which quantifies the predictability of interaction patterns. Experiments on multiple pre-trained models demonstrate that incorporating this auxiliary task improves intent recognition performance, outperforming existing approaches which ignore multi-party interaction dynamics. We find that our proposed continuous target can be learned as a single-task objective, suggesting that it is an actual signal carrying useful information.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2024

ContrastWSD: Enhancing Metaphor Detection with Word Sense Disambiguation Following the Metaphor Identification Procedure

This paper presents ContrastWSD, a RoBERTa-based metaphor detection model that integrates the Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP) and Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) to extract and contrast the contextual meaning with the basic meaning of a word to determine whether it is used metaphorically in a sentence. By utilizing the word senses derived from a WSD model, our model enhances the metaphor detection process and outperforms other methods that rely solely on contextual embeddings or integrate only the basic definitions and other external knowledge. We evaluate our approach on various benchmark datasets and compare it with strong baselines, indicating the effectiveness in advancing metaphor detection.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Bayesian Sparse Low-Rank Adaptation for Large Language Model Uncertainty Estimation

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable reasoning capabilities, but their task-specific fine-tuning is notoriously plagued by overconfidence, severely hindering trustworthy deployment. We propose Data-Adaptive Lower-Rank Adaptation (DALorRA), a simple and effective variational Bayesian sparse framework that shifts the paradigm of uncertainty quantification from the dense parameter space to the lightweight rank level of low-rank adaptation (LoRA). With the insight that LoRA essentially aggregates multiple rank-one components that may provide superfluous model capacity, DALorRA imposes stochastic masking on rank dimensions, enabling Bayesian regularization of model capacity during training and ensemble-like calibration during inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate DALorRA's excellent calibration of LLMs without compromising reasoning accuracy.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Agora: Enhancing LLM Agent Reasoning Via Auction-Based Task Allocation

Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents requires effective orchestration of diverse expert models and tools. However, existing frameworks typically call APIs, based on coarse-grained matching between tasks and the functions of expert models or tools, while overlooking critical factors such as performance variability and cost efficiency among functionally similar alternatives. To address this, we propose Agora, a framework that uses a confidence-calibrated auction to dynamically allocate tasks to expert models and tools. By treating reasoning steps as tradeable items, Agora bases allocation on calibrated competence rather than raw confidence. Across five main benchmarks, Agora improves or remains competitive with single-model, routing, and cascade baselines under matched candidate pools.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Auditing LLM Benchmarks with Item Response Theory

LLM benchmark labels are frozen at release and silently propagated into downstream benchmarks, errors and all. We introduce an Item Response Theory-based indicator that surfaces likely mislabels at 95% precision in the top 200 examples across seven preference and multiple-choice benchmarks using responses from 114 models, outperforming a supervised classifier. We trace these errors to mechanical labeling heuristics, upstream annotation mistakes inherited unchanged from source datasets, and fundamentally ambiguous items without a defensible single label. The same model fit reveals that reward models specialize in stylistic preference rather than factual knowledge, and identifies one frontier reward model that agrees with detected mislabels at 78% accuracy versus 38% for its peers, consistent with benchmark contamination or benchmark-specific over-optimization.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Improving Argument Saliency Coverage in Small LLMs for Long Legal Opinion Summarization via Sequence-Level Distillation

We show that sequence-level distillation from a capable long-context teacher model is a simple, annotation-free, and data-efficient strategy for improving argument saliency coverage in long legal opinion summarization, where small LLMs often struggle to retain the most salient argumentative content. Across student model sizes, distillation consistently surpasses tuning on expert-written summaries in our legal-opinion setting. We further demonstrate that most gains are achieved with as few as ~10 training summaries, highlighting the strong data efficiency of teacher-generated supervision. Finally, we find that summary distillation is sufficient for improvements: reasoning-chain distillation remains competitive with summary-only distillation, but provides marginal benefit when combined with summary supervision.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Notes to Self: Can LLMs Benefit from Experiential Abstractions?

Humans distill experience into reusable abstractions, e.g., strategies and cautionary reminders, and apply them to gradually solve problems more effectively. We study whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can similarly benefit from such experiential abstractions. From LLMs' solution traces on the MATH training set, a stronger teacher or the LLMs themselves extract natural-language abstractions into a retrievable library. We explore two usage modes: (1) inference-time retrieval and (2) reinforcement learning (RL) with abstraction-augmented training prompts. Experiential abstractions improve LLM performance on mathematical and logical reasoning benchmarks. Self-extracted abstractions match teacher-extracted ones, and our abstraction usage framework can transfer to other datasets and models. These findings suggest LLMs can extract and apply experiential abstractions much as humans leverage distilled experience.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Decompose, Look, and Reason: Reinforced Latent Reasoning for VLMs

Vision-Language Models often struggle with complex visual reasoning due to the visual information loss in textual CoT. Existing methods either add the cost of tool calls or rely on localized patch-based embeddings that are insufficient to extract semantics in multi-step reasoning. We propose "Decompose, Look, and Reason" (DLR), a reinforced latent reasoning framework that dynamically decomposes queries into textual premises, extracts premise-conditioned continuous visual latents, and deduces answers through grounded rationales. We introduce a three-stage training pipeline and propose a novel Spherical Gaussian Latent Policy, to enable effective exploration in the latent space. Extensive experiments on vision-centric benchmarks show that DLR consistently outperforms strong baselines, including text-only, interleaved multimodal CoT, and latent reasoning methods, while providing superior stepwise interpretability.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Apples to Apples? Towards Comparable Crosslingual Language Model Evaluation

Crosslingual evaluation of language models that enables fair comparisons remains a fundamental challenge in multilingual NLP. Existing studies adopt a variety of downstream tasks and intrinsic metrics with different theoretical justifications, yet there has been little empirical investigation into whether these approaches yield meaningful crosslingual conclusions. We systematically examine crosslingual evaluation approaches using controlled monolingual language models trained on parallel data with varying tokenizer vocabulary sizes and model sizes, and further validate our findings on multilingual LLMs. We further discuss challenges in achieving comparable downstream evaluation across languages. Our results show that several widely used normalized metrics introduce crosslinguistic biases rooted in tokenization, encoding, and orthographic differences. In contrast, sentence-level negative log-likelihood computed over semantically equivalent sequences provides more meaningful and consistent crosslingual comparisons.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

LV-ROVER-MLT: Low-Resource Maltese OCR by Synthetic Fine-Tuning and Multi-Stream Arbitration

Maltese has substantial text corpora and pretrained language models, but paragraph-scale OCR training data remains scarce; NOMOCRAT provides 57 verified annotated pages. LV-ROVER-MLT combines synthetic fine-tuning of Tesseract~5 with five complementary recognition streams and lexicon-gated word-level arbitration adapted to Maltese diacritics and hyphenation. In the DocEng~2026 Maltese OCR competition, the system placed first with held-out CER 0.0074; the next-ranked submission scored 0.0161 and NOMOCRAT scored 0.0163. The same approach produced a significant improvement over stock Tesseract on Luxembourgish, while the Hungarian result was inconclusive. A 36,803-pair Maltese OCR corpus constructed from EUR-Lex and Wikipedia provides an additional paragraph-level resource. Code, model weights, and corpus data are public.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

RoboTrustBench: Benchmarking the Trustworthiness of Video World Models for Robotic Manipulation

Video world models are increasingly used in robotic manipulation, yet existing benchmarks mostly evaluate them under valid, feasible, and safe instructions. We introduce RoboTrustBench, a benchmark for evaluating the trustworthiness of video world models under four scenarios: Normal, Constraint-Sensitive, Counterfactual, and Adversarial. Built from real-world DROID episodes, RoboTrustBench contains 1,207 expert-validated instruction-image pairs and a six-dimensional evaluation protocol with 13 fine-grained criteria. Evaluating seven representative video world models with human and MLLM assessment, we find that current models often generate visually coherent videos, but struggle with constraint reasoning, counterfactual grounding, physical interaction, and unsafe-instruction suppression. These results show that visual quality and surface-level instruction following are insufficient for trustworthy robotic video world modeling.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

When Robots Mishear Us: Mapping the Safety Risks of Voice-Controlled Embodied AI

We investigate whether automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors in user input can lead to unsafe outputs from Embodied AI (EAI) models. We find that ASR errors can lead to harmful instructions being accepted and executed by EAI models, thereby reducing safety. We simulate ASR errors and combine them with existing safety benchmarks (SafeAgentBench and POEX) to evaluate how different errors affect embodied AI safety. We find that some of them preserve semantic structure but increase harmful ambiguity, while others weaken the model refusal behaviour and allow unsafe plans to be generated and executed. We show that in some cases automatic correction of ASR errors can reduce the risk, but this is not always effective. Overall, we show that ASR errors lead to significant safety risks for embodied AI.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Which one is banana man? Evaluating vision-language models in multi-turn pragmatic interpretation

Flexible adaptation to context and shared pragmatic intuitions contribute to smooth human conversation. Iterated reference games---in which players repeatedly pick out novel referents using language---present a test case for agents' ability to perform context-sensitive pragmatic reasoning in multi-turn linguistic environments. We tested humans and vision--language models on their ability to identify the intended meaning of descriptions produced in iterated reference games, varying the provided context in terms of amount, order, and relevance. While humans performed well consistently, the models we evaluated could make use of prior context to interpret humans' referring expressions, but they struggled to build up the relevant context to interpret those expressions effectively. Our results suggest that the models we evaluated lack core skills needed for efficient linguistic collaboration.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Vocabulary Growth Fundamentals: Bernstein Functions and Hausdorff Sequences

We survey the theory of vocabulary growth founded in the setting of stochastic processes. In particular, we model the expected number of types through Bernstein functions and Hausdorff sequences. These classes of mathematical objects, defined by alternating signs of their derivatives or differences, can be related to continuous-time Poisson point processes and discrete-time IID processes, respectively. Building on previous accounts of the vocabulary growth, we integrate the broader theories of Bernstein functions and Hausdorff sequences and connect them with recently developed hapax rate models. In particular, we prove that the logistic hapax rate model has a non-negative spectrum and hence it defines a Bernstein function, thereby solving an earlier posed problem. We also analyze the limitations of the Bernstein--Hausdorff theory of the vocabulary growth by considering its generalizations under stationary and Weibull renewal processes.

math.PR↗
arXiv2026

Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Persuasive Dialogue

Large language models (LLMs) can generate apparently highly persuasive text, but does sounding persuasive mean arguing well? We introduce \textsc{Persuasio}, a multi-agent dialogue platform grounded in a formal argumentation-based theory of persuasion dialogues that adjudicates logical winners during free-text debates. Using this system, we generated 192 debates on a UK political topic between humans and LLMs, and evaluated 22 interlocutors through both automated adjudication and 9,702 crowdsourced pairwise judgements across 1{,}386 annotation instances. We observed a consistent decoupling between subjective and formal persuasiveness: LLMs dominated the subjective ranking yet performed substantially worse under argumentation-theoretic adjudication, where humans remained competitive. Multi-agent and retrieval-augmented variants further widened this divergence. These findings reveal a systematic gap between rhetorical fluency and formal argumentative strength in LLM-based persuasive dialogues.

cs.CL↗