Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0710.0191

Physics Engineering in the Study of the Pioneer Anomaly

Abstract

The Pioneer 10/11 spacecraft yielded the most precise navigation in deep space to date. However, their radio-metric tracking data received from the distances between 20--70 astronomical units from the Sun has consistently indicated the presence of a small, anomalous, Doppler frequency drift. The drift is a blue frequency shift that can be interpreted as a sunward acceleration of a_P = (8.74 +/- 1.33) x 10^{-10} m/s^2 for each particular spacecraft. This signal has become known as the Pioneer anomaly; the nature of this anomaly remains unexplained. Recently new Pioneer 10 and 11 radio-metric Doppler and flight telemetry data became available. The newly available Doppler data set is significantly enlarged when compared to the data used in previous investigations and is expected to be the primary source for the investigation of the anomaly. In addition, the flight telemetry files, original project documentation, and newly developed software tools are now used to reconstruct the engineering history of both spacecraft. With the help of this information, a thermal model of the Pioneer vehicles is being developed to study possible contribution of thermal recoil force acting on the two spacecraft. The ultimate goal of these physics engineering efforts is to evaluate the effect of on-board systems on the spacecrafts' trajectories.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Slava G. Turyshev, Viktor T. Toth. 2007-10-01. Physics Engineering in the Study of the Pioneer Anomaly. https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.0191

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Gannon Storm: Citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of 10 May 2024

The 10 May 2024 geomagnetic storm, referred to as the Gannon Storm in this paper, was one of the most extreme to have occurred in over 20 years. In the era of smartphones and social media, millions of people from all around the world were alerted to the possibility of exceptional auroral displays. Hence, many people not only witnessed but also photographed the aurora during this event. These citizen science observations, although not from scientific instruments operated by observatories or research groups, can prove invaluable in obtaining data to characterise this extraordinary event. In particular, many observers saw and photographed the aurora at mid-latitudes, where ground-based instruments targeting auroral studies are sparse or absent. We created an online survey and circulated it within networks of aurora photographers to collect observations of the aurora and disruptions in technological systems that were experienced during this superstorm. We obtained 696 citizen science reports from over 30 countries, containing information such as the time and location of aurora sightings, observed colours and auroral forms during the geomagnetic storm. We supplemented the obtained dataset with 186 auroral observations logged in the Skywarden catalogue by citizen scientists. The main findings enabled by the data collected through these reports are that the aurora was widely seen from locations at geomagnetic latitudes ranging between 30° and 60°, with a few reports from even lower latitudes. This was significantly further equatorward than predicted by auroral oval models. The reported auroral emission colours, predominantly red and pink and intense enough to reach naked-eye visibility, suggest that the auroral electron precipitation contained large fluxes of low-energy (< 1 keV) particles. (...)

physics.space-ph↗

An Adaptive Approach for Modeling Collisionless Plasma Shocks and Ion Heating in the Shock Frame

We present a novel computational method for hybrid (kinetic ions, quasi-neutral fluid electrons) simulations of non-relativistic magnetized collisionless plasma shocks, observed near the Sun, in the solar system, and beyond. This Adaptive Frame-Of-Reference Approach (AFORA) enables simulations of shocks in their co-moving frames of reference, where shock evolution remains quasi-steady for quasi-stationary upstream conditions, in contrast to moving shocks. We demonstrate our method in two spatial dimensions for a range of angles between the background magnetic field and the shock normal (obliquities). Shock-frame simulations, conducted with a time-adaptive hybrid code, HYPERS, are shown to self-consistently capture upstream and downstream magnetic fluctuations commonly observed by spacecraft at interplanetary shocks and Earth's bow shock. These fluctuations, which may be crucial for estimating the efficiency of ion acceleration at heliospheric and astrophysical shocks, are notably missing from many hybrid simulations of shocks, unless upstream external turbulence is imposed. The quasi-stationary behavior of numerical shocks in the shock frame is confirmed in a series of animations and by demonstrating converged ion energy spectra in the downstream region. Our approach underscores computationally efficient and physically more accurate modeling of shock-driven turbulence, downstream plasma relaxation, and concomitant ion heating in the shock frame. The new method can be used for exploring ion relaxation at interplanetary (IP) shocks, more efficient studies of cosmic rays (CRs) and plasma turbulence, and more accurate predictions of seed populations of Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs) at heliospheric shocks driven by coronal mass ejections (CMEs).

physics.space-ph↗

Validation of Space Weather Forecasting at Leonid Space

We validate Leonid Space's space weather forecasts through comprehensive cross-validation of retroforecasts scored against the entire F10.7 and Ap historical record. We built a unified forecast model that jointly forecasts F10.7 and Ap on all timescales from 3 hours up to multi-decade chains of future solar cycles. This was used to generate an archive of historical 15-year retroforecasts, after performing a leave-one-out fit of the model on held-out data and conditioning only on historical data available at the time. The accuracy of this archive was scored against measured space weather indices at all lookahead horizons from 1 day to 15 years, using the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) as the primary quality metric. All other publicly available F10.7 and Ap forecast archives were scored using the same approach, including NASA's MSAFE and Schatten forecasts, SWPC's 27-day, 45-day, and Solar Cycle predictions, SWPC/USAF's RSGA, SIDC's Ursigram, CLS, Athens, KSO, BGS, SEPC's 3-day and 27-day forecasts, AFRL/NSO's SIFT, and BoM. Taken together, these 15 flux forecasts and 12 Ap forecasts compared on common lookahead metrics make up the most comprehensive cross-comparison of space weather forecasts we are aware of. Over a common forecast interval since 2000, Leonid had the lowest CRPS prediction error of any F10.7 or Ap prediction model: strictly lowest for Ap at all lookaheads and for F10.7 up to 5 years, and parity with MSAFE after 5 years. Much of this performance comes from our well-calibrated uncertainty bands, and we urge space weather forecasters to include calibrated uncertainties with their predictions and to issue retroforecast archives that can be used to rigorously evaluate their generating models.

physics.space-ph↗