arXiv · 1105.2827
The Implications of Interactions for Science and Philosophy
Abstract
Reductionism has dominated science and philosophy for centuries. Complexity has recently shown that interactions---which reductionism neglects---are relevant for understanding phenomena. When interactions are considered, reductionism becomes limited in several aspects. In this paper, I argue that interactions imply non-reductionism, non-materialism, non-predictability, non-Platonism, and non-nihilism. As alternatives to each of these, holism, informism, adaptation, contextuality, and meaningfulness are put forward, respectively. A worldview that includes interactions not only describes better our world, but can help to solve many open scientific, philosophical, and social problems caused by implications of reductionism.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Carlos Gershenson. 2011-05-13. The Implications of Interactions for Science and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-012-9305-8
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.