arXiv · 1106.1980
How do Markov approximations compare with other methods for large spatial data sets?
Abstract
The Matérn covariance function is a popular choice for modeling dependence in spatial environmental data. Standard Matérn covariance models are, however, often computationally infeasible for large data sets. In this work, recent results for Markov approximations of Gaussian Matérn fields based on Hilbert space approximations are extended using wavelet basis functions. These Markov approximations are compared with two of the most popular methods for efficient covariance approximations; covariance tapering and the process convolution method. The results show that, for a given computational cost, the Markov methods have a substantial gain in accuracy compared with the other methods.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
David Bolin, Finn Lindgren. 2011-11-04. How do Markov approximations compare with other methods for large spatial data sets?. https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.1980
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.