SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1108.1320

Compressed Matrix Multiplication

Abstract

Motivated by the problems of computing sample covariance matrices, and of transforming a collection of vectors to a basis where they are sparse, we present a simple algorithm that computes an approximation of the product of two n-by-n real matrices A and B. Let ||AB||_F denote the Frobenius norm of AB, and b be a parameter determining the time/accuracy trade-off. Given 2-wise independent hash functions $_1,h_2: [n] -> [b], and s_1,s_2: [n] -> {-1,+1} the algorithm works by first "compressing" the matrix product into the polynomial p(x) = sum_{k=1}^n (sum_{i=1}^n A_{ik} s_1(i) x^{h_1(i)}) (sum_{j=1}^n B_{kj} s_2(j) x^{h_2(j)}) Using FFT for polynomial multiplication, we can compute c_0,...,c_{b-1} such that sum_i c_i x^i = (p(x) mod x^b) + (p(x) div x^b) in time \~O(n^2+ n b). An unbiased estimator of (AB)_{ij} with variance at most ||AB||_F^2 / b can then be computed as: C_{ij} = s_1(i) s_2(j) c_{(h_1(i)+h_2(j)) mod b. Our approach also leads to an algorithm for computing AB exactly, whp., in time \~O(N + nb) in the case where A and B have at most N nonzero entries, and AB has at most b nonzero entries. Also, we use error-correcting codes in a novel way to recover significant entries of AB in near-linear time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rasmus Pagh. 2011-08-05. Compressed Matrix Multiplication. https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.1320

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS