Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1205.3605

On Min-Power Steiner Tree

Fabrizio Grandoni
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the classical (min-cost) Steiner tree problem, we are given an edge-weighted undirected graph and a set of terminal nodes. The goal is to compute a min-cost tree S which spans all terminals. In this paper we consider the min-power version of the problem, which is better suited for wireless applications. Here, the goal is to minimize the total power consumption of nodes, where the power of a node v is the maximum cost of any edge of S incident to v. Intuitively, nodes are antennas (part of which are terminals that we need to connect) and edge costs define the power to connect their endpoints via bidirectional links (so as to support protocols with ack messages). Differently from its min-cost counterpart, min-power Steiner tree is NP-hard even in the spanning tree case, i.e. when all nodes are terminals. Since the power of any tree is within once and twice its cost, computing a rho \leq ln(4)+eps [Byrka et al.'10] approximate min-cost Steiner tree provides a 2rho<2.78 approximation for the problem. For min-power spanning tree the same approach provides a 2 approximation, which was improved to 5/3+eps with a non-trivial approach in [Althaus et al.'06]. Here we present an improved approximation algorithm for min-power Steiner tree. Our result is based on two main ingredients. We prove the first decomposition theorem for min-power Steiner tree, in the spirit of analogous structural results for min-cost Steiner tree and min-power spanning tree. Based on this theorem, we define a proper LP relaxation, that we exploit within the iterative randomized rounding framework in [Byrka et al.'10]. A careful analysis provides a 3ln 4-9/4+eps<1.91 approximation factor. The same approach gives an improved 1.5+eps approximation for min-power spanning tree as well, matching the approximation factor in [Nutov and Yaroshevitch'09] for the special case of min-power spanning tree with edge weights in {0,1}.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Fabrizio Grandoni. 2012-05-16. On Min-Power Steiner Tree. https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3605

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗