SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1207.7040

Fault-Tolerant Spanners for Doubling Metrics: Better and Simpler

Abstract

In STOC'95 Arya et al. (1995) conjectured that for any constant dimensional $n$-point Euclidean space, a $(1+\eps)$-spanner with constant degree, hop-diameter $O(\log n)$ and weight $O(\log n) \cdot ω(MST)$ can be built in $O(n \log n)$ time. Recently Elkin and Solomon (technical report, April 2012) proved this conjecture of Arya et al. in the affirmative. In fact, the proof of Elkin and Solomon is more general in two ways. First, it applies to arbitrary doubling metrics. Second, it provides a complete tradeoff between the three involved parameters that is tight (up to constant factors) in the entire range. Subsequently, Chan et al. (technical report, July 2012) provided another proof for Arya et al.'s conjecture, which is simpler than the proof of Elkin and Solomon. Moreover, Chan et al. (2012) also showed that one can build a fault-tolerant (FT) spanner with similar properties. Specifically, they showed that there exists a $k$-FT $(1+\eps)$-spanner with degree $O(k^2)$, hop-diameter $O(\log n)$ and weight $O(k^3 \cdot \log n) \cdot ω(MST)$. The running time of the construction of Chan et al. was not analyzed. In this work we improve the results of Chan et al., using a simpler proof. Specifically, we present a simple proof which shows that a $k$-FT $(1+\eps)$-spanner with degree $O(k^2)$, hop-diameter $O(\log n)$ and weight $O(k^2 \cdot \log n) \cdot ω(MST)$ can be built in $O(n \cdot (\log n + k^2))$ time. Similarly to the constructions of Elkin and Solomon and Chan et al., our construction applies to arbitrary doubling metrics. However, in contrast to the construction of Elkin and Solomon, our construction fails to provide a complete (and tight) tradeoff between the three involved parameters. The construction of Chan et al. has this drawback too. For random point sets in $\mathbb R^d$, we "shave" a factor of $\log n$ from the weight bound.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shay Solomon. 2012-12-27. Fault-Tolerant Spanners for Doubling Metrics: Better and Simpler. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7040

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS