SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1311.2557

Efficiently Computing Edit Distance to Dyck Language

Abstract

Given a string $σ$ over alphabet $Σ$ and a grammar $G$ defined over the same alphabet, how many minimum number of repairs: insertions, deletions and substitutions are required to map $σ$ into a valid member of $G$ ? We investigate this basic question in this paper for $Dyck(s)$. $Dyck(s)$ is a fundamental context free grammar representing the language of well-balanced parentheses with s different types of parentheses and has played a pivotal role in the development of theory of context free languages. Computing edit distance to $Dyck(s)$ significantly generalizes string edit distance problem and has numerous applications ranging from repairing semi-structured documents such as XML to memory checking, automated compiler optimization, natural language processing etc. In this paper we give the first near-linear time algorithm for edit distance computation to $Dyck(s)$ that achieves a nontrivial approximation factor of $O(\frac{1}ε\log{OPT}(\log{n})^{\frac{1}ε})$ in $O(n^{1+ε}\log{n})$ time. In fact, given there exists an algorithm for computing string edit distance on input of size $n$ in $α(n)$ time with $β(n)$-approximation factor, we can devise an algorithm for edit distance problem to $Dyck(s)$ running in $\tilde{O}(n^{1+ε}+α(n))$ and achieving an approximation factor of $O(\frac{1}εβ(n)\log{OPT})$. We show that the framework for efficiently approximating edit distance to $Dyck(s)$ can be applied to many other languages. We illustrate this by considering various memory checking languages which comprise of valid transcripts of stacks, queues, priority queues, double-ended queues etc. Therefore, any language that can be recognized by these data structures, can also be repaired efficiently by our algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Barna Saha. 2013-11-12. Efficiently Computing Edit Distance to Dyck Language. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.2557

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS