A Combinatorial $\tilde{O}(m^{3/2})$-time Algorithm for the Min-Cost Flow Problem

Ruben Becker; Andreas Karrenbauer

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1312.3905

A Combinatorial $\tilde{O}(m^{3/2})$-time Algorithm for the Min-Cost Flow Problem

Ruben Becker·Andreas Karrenbauer

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a combinatorial method for the min-cost flow problem and prove that its expected running time is bounded by $\tilde O(m^{3/2})$. This matches the best known bounds, which previously have only been achieved by numerical algorithms or for special cases. Our contribution contains three parts that might be interesting in their own right: (1) We provide a construction of an equivalent auxiliary network and interior primal and dual points with potential $P_0=\tilde{O}(\sqrt{m})$ in linear time. (2) We present a combinatorial potential reduction algorithm that transforms initial solutions of potential $P_0$ to ones with duality gap below $1$ in $\tilde O(P_0\cdot \mbox{CEF}(n,m,\epsilon))$ time, where $\epsilon^{-1}=O(m^2)$ and $\mbox{CEF}(n,m,\epsilon)$ denotes the running time of any combinatorial algorithm that computes an $\epsilon$-approximate electrical flow. (3) We show that solutions with duality gap less than $1$ suffice to compute optimal integral potentials in $O(m+n\log n)$ time with our novel crossover procedure. All in all, using a variant of a state-of-the-art $\epsilon$-electrical flow solver, we obtain an algorithm for the min-cost flow problem running in $\tilde O(m^{3/2})$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Ruben Becker, Andreas Karrenbauer. 2013-12-13. A Combinatorial $\tilde{O}(m^{3/2})$-time Algorithm for the Min-Cost Flow Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.3905

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗