SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1409.4092

Facility location problems in the constant work-space read-only memory model

Abstract

Facility location problems are captivating both from theoretical and practical point of view. In this paper, we study some fundamental facility location problems from the space-efficient perspective. Here the input is considered to be given in a read-only memory and only constant amount of work-space is available during the computation. This {\em constant-work-space model} is well-motivated for handling big-data as well as for computing in smart portable devices with small amount of extra-space. First, we propose a strategy to implement prune-and-search in this model. As a warm up, we illustrate this technique for finding the Euclidean 1-center constrained on a line for a set of points in $\IR^2$. This method works even if the input is given in a sequential access read-only memory. Using this we show how to compute (i) the Euclidean 1-center of a set of points in $\IR^2$, and (ii) the weighted 1-center and weighted 2-center of a tree network. The running time of all these algorithms are $O(n~poly(\log n))$. While the result of (i) gives a positive answer to an open question asked by Asano, Mulzer, Rote and Wang in 2011, the technique used can be applied to other problems which admit solutions by prune-and-search paradigm. For example, we can apply the technique to solve two and three dimensional linear programming in $O(n~poly(\log n))$ time in this model. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first sub-quadratic time algorithms for all the above mentioned problems in the constant-work-space model. We also present optimal linear time algorithms for finding the centroid and weighted median of a tree in this model.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Binay K. Bhattacharya, Minati De, Subhas C. Nandy, Sasanka Roy. 2014-09-14. Facility location problems in the constant work-space read-only memory model. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.4092

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS