SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1502.06195

Exact Minkowski Sums of Polygons With Holes

Abstract

We present an efficient algorithm that computes the Minkowski sum of two polygons, which may have holes. The new algorithm is based on the convolution approach. Its efficiency stems in part from a property for Minkowski sums of polygons with holes, which in fact holds in any dimension: Given two polygons with holes, for each input polygon we can fill up the holes that are relatively small compared to the other polygon. Specifically, we can always fill up all the holes of at least one polygon, transforming it into a simple polygon, and still obtain exactly the same Minkowski sum. Obliterating holes in the input summands speeds up the computation of Minkowski sums. We introduce a robust implementation of the new algorithm, which follows the Exact Geometric Computation paradigm and thus guarantees exact results. We also present an empirical comparison of the performance of Minkowski sum construction of various input examples, where we show that the implementation of the new algorithm exhibits better performance than several other implementations in many cases. In particular, we compared the implementation of the new algorithm, an implementation of the standard convolution algorithm, and an implementation of the decomposition approach using various convex decomposition methods, including two new methods that handle polygons with holes - one is based on vertical decomposition and the other is based on triangulation. The software has been developed as an extension of the "2D Minkowski Sums" package of CGAL (Computational Geometry Algorithms Library). Additional information and supplementary material is available at our project page http://acg.cs.tau.ac.il/projects/rc

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alon Baram, Efi Fogel, Michael Hemmer, Dan Halperin, Sebastian Morr. 2015-02-22. Exact Minkowski Sums of Polygons With Holes. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48350-3_7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG