An Optimal Bidimensional Multi-Armed Bandit Auction for Multi-unit Procurement

Satyanath Bhat; Shweta Jain; Sujit Gujar; Y. Narahari

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1502.06934

An Optimal Bidimensional Multi-Armed Bandit Auction for Multi-unit Procurement

Satyanath Bhat·Shweta Jain·Sujit Gujar·Y. Narahari

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the problem of a buyer (aka auctioneer) who gains stochastic rewards by procuring multiple units of a service or item from a pool of heterogeneous strategic agents. The reward obtained for a single unit from an allocated agent depends on the inherent quality of the agent; the agent's quality is fixed but unknown. Each agent can only supply a limited number of units (capacity of the agent). The costs incurred per unit and capacities are private information of the agents. The auctioneer is required to elicit costs as well as capacities (making the mechanism design bidimensional) and further, learn the qualities of the agents as well, with a view to maximize her utility. Motivated by this, we design a bidimensional multi-armed bandit procurement auction that seeks to maximize the expected utility of the auctioneer subject to incentive compatibility and individual rationality while simultaneously learning the unknown qualities of the agents. We first assume that the qualities are known and propose an optimal, truthful mechanism 2D-OPT for the auctioneer to elicit costs and capacities. Next, in order to learn the qualities of the agents in addition, we provide sufficient conditions for a learning algorithm to be Bayesian incentive compatible and individually rational. We finally design a novel learning mechanism, 2D-UCB that is stochastic Bayesian incentive compatible and individually rational.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Satyanath Bhat, Shweta Jain, Sujit Gujar, Y. Narahari. 2015-02-24. An Optimal Bidimensional Multi-Armed Bandit Auction for Multi-unit Procurement. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.06934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗