Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1505.02039

Structural default model with mutual obligations

Andrey Itkin·Alexander Lipton
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper considers mutual obligations in the interconnected bank system and analyzes their influence on joint and marginal survival probabilities as well as CDS and FTD prices for the individual banks. To make the role of mutual obligations more transparent, a simple structural default model with banks' assets driven by correlated multidimensional Brownian motion with drift is considered. This model enables a closed form representation for many quantities of interest, at least in a 2D case, to be obtained, and moreover, model calibration is provided. Finally, we demonstrate that mutual obligations have to be taken into account in order to get correct values for model parameters.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PRq-fin.CPq-fin.MF

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andrey Itkin, Alexander Lipton. 2015-05-08. Structural default model with mutual obligations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02039

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Pricing and Hedging of Discretely Monitored Asian Options in the Volterra-Heston Model

We develop semi-closed pricing formulas and lifted-model hedging methods for discretely monitored geometric and arithmetic Asian options in the Volterra-Heston stochastic volatility model. Exploiting the affine Volterra structure, we derive a tractable transform for the joint law of the terminal log-price and the discretely monitored geometric average. This transform yields semi-closed pricing formulas for geometric Asian options, which in turn provide effective control variates for Monte Carlo valuation of arithmetic Asian options. Under the stated real-moment and affine-transform hypotheses, we also derive the Galtchouk-Kunita-Watanabe decomposition for Fourier-representable payoffs and obtain a variance-optimal hedge in terms of the Riccati-Volterra equation and the forward-variance curve. Using N-factor Markovian approximations, we obtain a finite-dimensional numerical implementation for hedging Asian options. Our numerical experiments document factor convergence for a regular non-Markovian kernel and the effect of rebalancing frequency on hedging error. In the Heston benchmark, geometric Asian controls substantially reduce the variance of arithmetic-Asian price estimates and improve the finite-sample stability of regression-based hedging relative to direct regression.

q-fin.PR↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Lognormal Sums: A Four-Moment Probability Framework for Basket and Spread Option Pricing

Basket options are difficult to value under correlated lognormal dynamics because weighted sums and differences of lognormal variables have no tractable distribution. This paper develops a probability-based four-moment framework that separates the exact pricing representation from the distributional approximation. A change of measure first writes a basket price as a linear combination of probabilities. For a standard basket with one positive weight, these probabilities become CDF values of positive correlated lognormal sums. Each sum is approximated by a shifted lognormal variance mixture matched to its first four moments. For an unrestricted mixed-sign basket, a signed shifted lognormal proxy gives an analytical call-price formula. We state admissibility conditions, provide a practical root-selection rule, establish the main strike-based financial properties of the direct proxy, and derive exact pricing-error identities in terms of cumulative distribution function (CDF) discrepancies. The numerical analysis combines standard-basket benchmarks with an empirical application to a normalized $3{:}2{:}1$ crack spread constructed from RBOB gasoline, ULSD or heating oil, and WTI futures. The results show that the probability reformulation and the fourth-moment condition improve the distributional fit and pricing accuracy, particularly when maturity and tail asymmetry increase. The framework remains analytical, transparent, and suitable for repeated valuation across strikes and maturities.

q-fin.PR↗
arXiv2026

When to Sell an Asset? - A Distribution Builder Approach

We consider the question of the optimal timing of the sale of an asset with stochastic dynamics. Our analysis is based on the method of the distribution builder introduced by Sharpe, Goldstein and Blythe [SGB00] for the purpose of optimal portfolio selection. Instead of specifying a utility function or risk aversion coefficient, this tool directly elicits the target distribution of the investor. We show how the problem of an optimal asset sale is in this setting linked to the problem of finding a Skorokhod embedding of a distribution into a diffusion process. In the case where the asset process follows a geometric Brownian motion and a specific family of distributions is targeted, one can observe a risk-return tradeoff.

q-fin.PR↗