SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1506.04505

Applications of Uniform Sampling: Densest Subgraph and Beyond

Abstract

Recently [Bhattacharya et al., STOC 2015] provide the first non-trivial algorithm for the densest subgraph problem in the streaming model with additions and deletions to its edges, i.e., for dynamic graph streams. They present a $(0.5-ε)$-approximation algorithm using $\tilde{O}(n)$ space, where factors of $ε$ and $\log(n)$ are suppressed in the $\tilde{O}$ notation. However, the update time of this algorithm is large. To remedy this, they also provide a $(0.25-ε)$-approximation algorithm using $\tilde{O}(n)$ space with update time $\tilde{O}(1)$. In this paper we improve the algorithms by Bhattacharya et al. by providing a $(1-ε)$-approximation algorithm using $\tilde{O}(n)$ space. Our algorithm is conceptually simple - it samples $\tilde{O}(n)$ edges uniformly at random, and finds the densest subgraph on the sampled graph. We also show how to perform this sampling with update time $\tilde{O}(1)$. In addition to this, we show that given oracle access to the edge set, we can implement our algorithm in time $\tilde{O}(n)$ on a graph in the standard RAM model. To the best of our knowledge this is the fastest $(0.5-ε)$-approximation algorithm for the densest subgraph problem in the RAM model given such oracle access. Further, we extend our results to a general class of graph optimization problems that we call heavy subgraph problems. This class contains many interesting problems such as densest subgraph, directed densest subgraph, densest bipartite subgraph, $d$-cut and $d$-heavy connected component. Our result, by characterizing heavy subgraph problems, partially addresses open problem 13 at the IITK Workshop on Algorithms for Data Streams in 2006 regarding the effects of subsampling in this context.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hossein Esfandiari, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, David P. Woodruff. 2015-07-29. Applications of Uniform Sampling: Densest Subgraph and Beyond. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04505

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS