arXiv · 1608.04631
Neural versus Phrase-Based Machine Translation Quality: a Case Study
Abstract
Within the field of Statistical Machine Translation (SMT), the neural approach (NMT) has recently emerged as the first technology able to challenge the long-standing dominance of phrase-based approaches (PBMT). In particular, at the IWSLT 2015 evaluation campaign, NMT outperformed well established state-of-the-art PBMT systems on English-German, a language pair known to be particularly hard because of morphology and syntactic differences. To understand in what respects NMT provides better translation quality than PBMT, we perform a detailed analysis of neural versus phrase-based SMT outputs, leveraging high quality post-edits performed by professional translators on the IWSLT data. For the first time, our analysis provides useful insights on what linguistic phenomena are best modeled by neural models -- such as the reordering of verbs -- while pointing out other aspects that remain to be improved.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Luisa Bentivogli, Arianna Bisazza, Mauro Cettolo, Marcello Federico. 2016-10-09. Neural versus Phrase-Based Machine Translation Quality: a Case Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04631
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.