Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1610.07867

Foundations of Trigonometry: Conceptual and Logical, Being an Essay Towards a Conceptual Foundations of Mathematics

Mohamed A. Amer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Noticing that all of the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries treatments of trigonometry surveyed in this article are conceptually or logically defective, it is required to seek a conceptually sound and logically correct foundations of the subject. To this end, several questions have to be discussed: Is mathematics arbitrary? What does it have to do with nature? Reality? Applications? What is measure? Direct measure? Indirect measure? What are ratios? Eudoxean ratios? What is their relationship to measure? What are the real numbers? What is their relationship to ratios? To measure? What are the geometric trigonometric functions? The analytic trigonometric functions? What is the relationship between them? What is the measure of an angle? what is its relationship to trigonometry?......? After dealing with these philosophical and technical questions, a treatment of both geometric and analytic trigonometry which would be conceptually sound and logically correct foundations of the subject is proposed. This treatment distinguishes between geometric trigonometric functions (the elements of whose domain are angles) and analytic trigonometric functions (the elements of whose domain are real numbers), the bridge from the former to the latter is the measure of angles. The geometric trigonometric functions are defined to be the Eudoxean ratios between appropriate straight line-segments, and the measure of an angle is defined to be its Eudoxean ratio to the radian, which is to be defined beforehand. Also, the Eudoxean ratios were defined beforehand, and it was advocated that it is conceptually sound to consider them as the positive elements of the field of the real numbers.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mohamed A. Amer. 2016-10-16. Foundations of Trigonometry: Conceptual and Logical, Being an Essay Towards a Conceptual Foundations of Mathematics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07867

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗