SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1611.03225

Sharper Bounds for Regularized Data Fitting

Abstract

We study matrix sketching methods for regularized variants of linear regression, low rank approximation, and canonical correlation analysis. Our main focus is on sketching techniques which preserve the objective function value for regularized problems, which is an area that has remained largely unexplored. We study regularization both in a fairly broad setting, and in the specific context of the popular and widely used technique of ridge regularization; for the latter, as applied to each of these problems, we show algorithmic resource bounds in which the {\em statistical dimension} appears in places where in previous bounds the rank would appear. The statistical dimension is always smaller than the rank, and decreases as the amount of regularization increases. In particular, for the ridge low-rank approximation problem $\min_{Y,X} \lVert YX - A \rVert_F^2 + \lambda \lVert Y\rVert_F^2 + \lambda\lVert X \rVert_F^2$, where $Y\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times k}$ and $X\in\mathbb{R}^{k\times d}$, we give an approximation algorithm needing \[ O(\mathtt{nnz}(A)) + \tilde{O}((n+d)\varepsilon^{-1}k \min\{k, \varepsilon^{-1}\mathtt{sd}_\lambda(Y^*)\})+ \mathtt{poly}(\mathtt{sd}_\lambda(Y^*) \varepsilon^{-1}) \] time, where $s_{\lambda}(Y^*)\le k$ is the statistical dimension of $Y^*$, $Y^*$ is an optimal $Y$, $\varepsilon$ is an error parameter, and $\mathtt{nnz}(A)$ is the number of nonzero entries of $A$.This is faster than prior work, even when $\lambda=0$. We also study regularization in a much more general setting. For example, we obtain sketching-based algorithms for the low-rank approximation problem $\min_{X,Y} \lVert YX - A \rVert_F^2 + f(Y,X)$ where $f(\cdot,\cdot)$ is a regularizing function satisfying some very general conditions (chiefly, invariance under orthogonal transformations).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Haim Avron, Kenneth L. Clarkson, David P. Woodruff. 2016-11-10. Sharper Bounds for Regularized Data Fitting. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.03225

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS