SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1705.10723

Fast Regression with an $\ell_\infty$ Guarantee

Abstract

Sketching has emerged as a powerful technique for speeding up problems in numerical linear algebra, such as regression. In the overconstrained regression problem, one is given an $n \times d$ matrix $A$, with $n \gg d$, as well as an $n \times 1$ vector $b$, and one wants to find a vector $\hat{x}$ so as to minimize the residual error $\|Ax-b\|_2$. Using the sketch and solve paradigm, one first computes $S \cdot A$ and $S \cdot b$ for a randomly chosen matrix $S$, then outputs $x' = (SA)^{\dagger} Sb$ so as to minimize $\|SAx' - Sb\|_2$. The sketch-and-solve paradigm gives a bound on $\|x'-x^*\|_2$ when $A$ is well-conditioned. Our main result is that, when $S$ is the subsampled randomized Fourier/Hadamard transform, the error $x' - x^*$ behaves as if it lies in a "random" direction within this bound: for any fixed direction $a\in \mathbb{R}^d$, we have with $1 - d^{-c}$ probability that \[ \langle a, x'-x^*\rangle \lesssim \frac{\|a\|_2\|x'-x^*\|_2}{d^{\frac{1}{2}-\gamma}}, \quad (1) \] where $c, \gamma > 0$ are arbitrary constants. This implies $\|x'-x^*\|_{\infty}$ is a factor $d^{\frac{1}{2}-\gamma}$ smaller than $\|x'-x^*\|_2$. It also gives a better bound on the generalization of $x'$ to new examples: if rows of $A$ correspond to examples and columns to features, then our result gives a better bound for the error introduced by sketch-and-solve when classifying fresh examples. We show that not all oblivious subspace embeddings $S$ satisfy these properties. In particular, we give counterexamples showing that matrices based on Count-Sketch or leverage score sampling do not satisfy these properties. We also provide lower bounds, both on how small $\|x'-x^*\|_2$ can be, and for our new guarantee (1), showing that the subsampled randomized Fourier/Hadamard transform is nearly optimal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eric Price, Zhao Song, David P. Woodruff. 2017-05-30. Fast Regression with an $\ell_\infty$ Guarantee. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10723

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS