SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1710.00954

Online Unit Covering in Euclidean Space

Abstract

We revisit the online Unit Covering problem in higher dimensions: Given a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, that arrive one by one, cover the points by balls of unit radius, so as to minimize the number of balls used. In this paper, we work in $\mathbb{R}^d$ using Euclidean distance. The current best competitive ratio of an online algorithm, $O(2^d d \log{d})$, is due to Charikar et al. (2004); their algorithm is deterministic. (I) We give an online deterministic algorithm with competitive ratio $O(1.321^d)$, thereby sharply improving on the earlier record by a large exponential factor. In particular, the competitive ratios are $5$ for the plane and $12$ for $3$-space (the previous ratios were $7$ and $21$, respectively). For $d=3$, the ratio of our online algorithm matches the ratio of the current best offline algorithm for the same problem due to Biniaz et al. (2017), which is remarkable (and rather unusual). (II) We show that the competitive ratio of every deterministic online algorithm (with an adaptive deterministic adversary) for Unit Covering in $\mathbb{R}^d$ under the $L_{2}$ norm is at least $d+1$ for every $d \geq 1$. This greatly improves upon the previous best lower bound, $\Omega(\log{d} / \log{\log{\log{d}}})$, due to Charikar et al. (2004). (III) We obtain lower bounds of $4$ and $5$ for the competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm for online Unit Covering in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and respectively $\mathbb{R}^3$; the previous best lower bounds were both $3$. (IV) When the input points are taken from the square or hexagonal lattices in $\mathbb{R}^2$, we give deterministic online algorithms for Unit Covering with an optimal competitive ratio of $3$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Adrian Dumitrescu, Anirban Ghosh, Csaba D. Tóth. 2017-10-03. Online Unit Covering in Euclidean Space. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.00954

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG