SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1710.02587

The Paulsen Problem, Continuous Operator Scaling, and Smoothed Analysis

Abstract

The Paulsen problem is a basic open problem in operator theory: Given vectors $u_1, \ldots, u_n \in \mathbb R^d$ that are $\epsilon$-nearly satisfying the Parseval's condition and the equal norm condition, is it close to a set of vectors $v_1, \ldots, v_n \in \mathbb R^d$ that exactly satisfy the Parseval's condition and the equal norm condition? Given $u_1, \ldots, u_n$, the squared distance (to the set of exact solutions) is defined as $\inf_{v} \sum_{i=1}^n \| u_i - v_i \|_2^2$ where the infimum is over the set of exact solutions. Previous results show that the squared distance of any $\epsilon$-nearly solution is at most $O({\rm{poly}}(d,n,\epsilon))$ and there are $\epsilon$-nearly solutions with squared distance at least $\Omega(d\epsilon)$. The fundamental open question is whether the squared distance can be independent of the number of vectors $n$. We answer this question affirmatively by proving that the squared distance of any $\epsilon$-nearly solution is $O(d^{13/2} \epsilon)$. Our approach is based on a continuous version of the operator scaling algorithm and consists of two parts. First, we define a dynamical system based on operator scaling and use it to prove that the squared distance of any $\epsilon$-nearly solution is $O(d^2 n \epsilon)$. Then, we show that by randomly perturbing the input vectors, the dynamical system will converge faster and the squared distance of an $\epsilon$-nearly solution is $O(d^{5/2} \epsilon)$ when $n$ is large enough and $\epsilon$ is small enough. To analyze the convergence of the dynamical system, we develop some new techniques in lower bounding the operator capacity, a concept introduced by Gurvits to analyze the operator scaling algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tsz Chiu Kwok, Lap Chi Lau, Yin Tat Lee, Akshay Ramachandran. 2017-10-06. The Paulsen Problem, Continuous Operator Scaling, and Smoothed Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02587

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS