arXiv · 1711.00841
Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methods
Abstract
We establish lower bounds on the complexity of finding $\epsilon$-stationary points of smooth, non-convex high-dimensional functions using first-order methods. We prove that deterministic first-order methods, even applied to arbitrarily smooth functions, cannot achieve convergence rates in $\epsilon$ better than $\epsilon^{-8/5}$, which is within $\epsilon^{-1/15}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ of the best known rate for such methods. Moreover, for functions with Lipschitz first and second derivatives, we prove no deterministic first-order method can achieve convergence rates better than $\epsilon^{-12/7}$, while $\epsilon^{-2}$ is a lower bound for functions with only Lipschitz gradient. For convex functions with Lipschitz gradient, accelerated gradient descent achieves the rate $\epsilon^{-1}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon}$, showing that finding stationary points is easier given convexity.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Yair Carmon, John C. Duchi, Oliver Hinder, Aaron Sidford. 2017-11-02. Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methods. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00841
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.