arXiv · 1711.03874
Material Classification in the Wild: Do Synthesized Training Data Generalise Better than Real-World Training Data?
Abstract
We question the dominant role of real-world training images in the field of material classification by investigating whether synthesized data can generalise more effectively than real-world data. Experimental results on three challenging real-world material databases show that the best performing pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures can achieve up to 91.03% mean average precision when classifying materials in cross-dataset scenarios. We demonstrate that synthesized data achieve an improvement on mean average precision when used as training data and in conjunction with pre-trained CNN architectures, which spans from ~ 5% to ~ 19% across three widely used material databases of real-world images.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Grigorios Kalliatakis, Anca Sticlaru, George Stamatiadis, Shoaib Ehsan, Ales Leonardis, Juergen Gall, Klaus D. McDonald-Maier. 2017-11-09. Material Classification in the Wild: Do Synthesized Training Data Generalise Better than Real-World Training Data?. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03874
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.