SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1711.04625

Measure Theory and Integration By and For the Learner

Abstract

Measure Theory and Integration is exposed with the clear aim to help beginning learners to perfectly master its essence. In opposition of a delivery of the contents in an academic and vertical course, the knowledge is broken into exercises which are left to the learners for solutions. Hints are present at any corner to help readers to achieve the solutions. In that way, the knowledge is constructed by the readers by summarizing the results of one or a group of exercises. Each chapter is organized into Summary documents which contain the knowledge, Discovery documents which give the learner the opportunity to extract the knowledge himself through exercises and into Solution Documents which offer detailed answers for the exercises. Exceptionally, a few number of results (A key lemma related the justification of definition of the integral of a non-negative function, the Caratheodory's theorem and the Lebesgue-Stieljes measure on $\mathbb{R}^d$) are presented in appendix documents and given for reading in small groups. The full theory is presented in the described way. We highly expect that any student who goes through the materials, alone or in a small group or under the supervision of an assistant will gain a very solid knowledge in the subject and by the way ensure a sound foundation for studying disciplines such as Probability Theory, Statistics, Functional Analysis, etc. The materials have been successfully used as such in normal real analysis classes several times.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gane Samb Lo, Aladji Babacar Niang. 2021-07-14. Measure Theory and Integration By and For the Learner. https://doi.org/10.16929/sbs%2F2016.0005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO