SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1801.00551

Sketching and Clustering Metric Measure Spaces

Abstract

Two important optimization problems in the analysis of geometric data sets are clustering and sketching. Here, clustering refers to the problem of partitioning some input metric measure space (mm-space) into k clusters, minimizing some objective function f. Sketching, on the other hand, is the problem of approximating some mm-space by a smaller one supported on a set of k points. Specifically, we define the k-sketch of some mm-space M to be the nearest neighbor of M in the set of k-point mm-spaces, under some distance function \rho on the set of mm-spaces. In this paper, we demonstrate a duality between general classes of clustering and sketching problems. We present a general method for efficiently transforming a solution for a clustering problem to a solution for a sketching problem, and vice versa, with approximately equal cost. More specifically, we obtain the following results. 1. For metric spaces, we consider the case where the clustering objective is minimizing the maximum cluster diameter. We show that the ratio between the sketching and clustering objectives is constant over compact metric spaces. 2. We extend these results to the setting of metric measure spaces where we prove that the ratio of sketching to clustering objectives is bounded both above and below by some universal constants. In this setting, the clustering objective involves minimizing various notions of the l_p-diameters} of the clusters. 3. We consider two competing notions of sketching for mm-spaces, with one of them being more demanding than the other. These notions arise from two different definitions of p-Gromov-Wasserstein distance that have appeared in the literature. We then prove that whereas the gap between these can be arbitrarily large, in the case of doubling metric spaces the resulting sketching objectives are polynomially related.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Facundo Mémoli, Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Kritika Singhal. 2018-01-02. Sketching and Clustering Metric Measure Spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00551

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG