SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1801.04414

Tight Bounds for $\ell_p$ Oblivious Subspace Embeddings

Abstract

An $\ell_p$ oblivious subspace embedding is a distribution over $r \times n$ matrices $\Pi$ such that for any fixed $n \times d$ matrix $A$, $$\Pr_{\Pi}[\textrm{for all }x, \ \|Ax\|_p \leq \|\Pi Ax\|_p \leq \kappa \|Ax\|_p] \geq 9/10,$$ where $r$ is the dimension of the embedding, $\kappa$ is the distortion of the embedding, and for an $n$-dimensional vector $y$, $\|y\|_p$ is the $\ell_p$-norm. Another important property is the sparsity of $\Pi$, that is, the maximum number of non-zero entries per column, as this determines the running time of computing $\Pi \cdot A$. While for $p = 2$ there are nearly optimal tradeoffs in terms of the dimension, distortion, and sparisty, for the important case of $1 \leq p < 2$, much less was known. In this paper we obtain nearly optimal tradeoffs for $\ell_p$ oblivious subspace embeddings for every $1 \leq p < 2$. We show for every $1 \leq p < 2$, any oblivious subspace embedding with dimension $r$ has distortion $\kappa = \Omega \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{d}\right)^{1 / p} \cdot \log^{2 / p}r + \left(\frac{r}{n}\right)^{1 / p - 1 / 2}}\right).$ When $r = \mathrm{poly}(d)$ in applications, this gives a $\kappa = \Omega(d^{1/p}\log^{-2/p} d)$ lower bound, and shows the oblivious subspace embedding of Sohler and Woodruff (STOC, 2011) for $p = 1$ and the oblivious subspace embedding of Meng and Mahoney (STOC, 2013) for $1 < p < 2$ are optimal up to $\mathrm{poly}(\log(d))$ factors. We also give sparse oblivious subspace embeddings for every $1 \leq p < 2$ which are optimal in dimension and distortion, up to $\mathrm{poly}(\log d)$ factors. Oblivious subspace embeddings are crucial for distributed and streaming environments, as well as entrywise $\ell_p$ low rank approximation. Our results give improved algorithms for these applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ruosong Wang, David P. Woodruff. 2018-01-13. Tight Bounds for $\ell_p$ Oblivious Subspace Embeddings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04414

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS