arXiv · 1803.01527
A comment on 'Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries'
Abstract
We revisit the results of Harvie (2000) and show how correcting for a reporting mistake in some of the estimated parameter values leads to significantly different conclusions, including realistic parameter values for the Philips curve and estimated equilibrium employment rates exhibiting on average one tenth of the relative error of those obtained in Harvie (2000).
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Matheus R. Grasselli, Aditya Maheshwari. 2018-03-05. A comment on 'Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries'. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje%2Fbex018
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.