SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1804.07055

Quantum Lov\'asz Local Lemma: Shearer's Bound is Tight

Abstract

The Lov\'asz Local Lemma (LLL) is a very powerful tool in combinatorics and probability theory to show the possibility of avoiding all bad events under some weakly dependent conditions. In a seminal paper, Ambainis, Kempe, and Sattath (JACM 2012) introduced a quantum version LLL (QLLL) which shows the possibility of avoiding all ``bad" Hamiltonians under some weakly dependent condition, and applied QLLL to the random k-QSAT problem. Sattath, Morampudi, Laumann, and Moessner (PNAS 2015) extended Ambainis, Kempe, and Sattath's result and showed that Shearer's bound is a sufficient condition for QLLL, and conjectured that Shearer's bound is indeed the tight condition for QLLL. In this paper, we affirm this conjecture. Precisely, we prove that Shearer's bound is tight for QLLL, i.e., the relative dimension of the smallest satisfying subspace is completely characterized by the independent set polynomial. Our result implies the tightness of Gily\'en and Sattath's algorithm (FOCS 2017), and also implies that the lattice gas partition function fully characterizes quantum satisfiability for almost all Hamiltonians with large enough qudits (Sattath, Morampudi, Laumann and Moessner, PNAS 2015). The commuting LLL (CLLL), which focuses on commuting local Hamiltonians, is also investigated here. We prove that the tight regions of CLLL and QLLL are different in general. This result indicates that it is possible to design an algorithm for CLLL which is still efficient beyond Shearer's bound.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kun He, Qian Li, Xiaoming Sun, Jiapeng Zhang. 2018-04-19. Quantum Lov\'asz Local Lemma: Shearer's Bound is Tight. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07055

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC