arXiv · 1807.03612
Revisiting Synthesis Model of Sparse Audio Declipper
Abstract
The state of the art in audio declipping has currently been achieved by SPADE (SParse Audio DEclipper) algorithm by Kitić et al. Until now, the synthesis/sparse variant, S-SPADE, has been considered significantly slower than its analysis/cosparse counterpart, A-SPADE. It turns out that the opposite is true: by exploiting a recent projection lemma, individual iterations of both algorithms can be made equally computationally expensive, while S-SPADE tends to require considerably fewer iterations to converge. In this paper, the two algorithms are compared across a range of parameters such as the window length, window overlap and redundancy of the transform. The experiments show that although S-SPADE typically converges faster, the average performance in terms of restoration quality is not superior to A-SPADE.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Pavel Záviška, Pavel Rajmic, Zdeněk Průša, Vítězslav Veselý. 2018-07-11. Revisiting Synthesis Model of Sparse Audio Declipper. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93764-9_40
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.