SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1807.06272

Almost optimal query algorithm for hitting set using a subset query

Abstract

Given access to the hypergraph through a subset query oracle in the query model, we give sublinear time algorithms for Hitting-Set with almost tight parameterized query complexity. In parameterized query complexity, we estimate the number of queries to the oracle based on the parameter $k$, the size of the Hitting-Set. The subset query oracle we use in this paper is called Generalized $d$-partite Independent Set query oracle (GPIS) and it was introduced by Bishnu et al. (ISAAC'18). GPIS is a generalization to hypergraphs of the Bipartite Independent Set query oracle (BIS) introduced by Beame et al. (ITCS'18 and TALG'20) for estimating the number of edges in graphs. Formally, GPIS is defined as follows: GPIS oracle for a $d$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ takes as input $d$ pairwise disjoint non-empty subsets $A_1, \ldots, A_d$ of vertices in $\cal H$ and answers whether there is a hyperedge in $\mathcal{H}$ that intersects each set $A_i$, where $i \in \{1, \, 2, \, \ldots, d\}$. } For $d=2$, the GPIS oracle is nothing but BIS oracle. We show that $d$-Hitting-Set, the hitting set problem for $d$-uniform hypergraphs, can be solved using $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}_d(k^{d} \log n)$ GPIS queries. Additionally, we also showed that $d$-Decesion-Hitting-Set, the decision version of $d$-Hitting-Set can be solved with $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}_d\left( \min \left\{ k^d\log n, k^{2d^2} \right\} \right)$ {\sc GPIS} queries. We complement these parameterized upper bounds with an almost matching parameterized lower bound that states that any algorithm that solves $d$-Decesion-Hitting-Set requires $\Omega \left( \binom{k+d}{d} \right)$ GPIS queries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arijit Bishnu, Arijit Ghosh, Sudeshna Kolay, Gopinath Mishra, Saket Saurabh. 2018-07-17. Almost optimal query algorithm for hitting set using a subset query. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06272

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS