SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1807.08078

Metric Violation Distance: Revisited and Extended

Abstract

Metric data plays an important role in various settings such as metric-based indexing, clustering, classification, and approximation algorithms in general. Due to measurement error, noise, or an inability to completely gather all the data, a collection of distances may not satisfy the basic metric requirements, most notably the triangle inequality. Thus last year the authors introduced the Metric Violation Distance (MVD) problem, where the input is an undirected and positively-weighted complete graph, and the goal is to identify a minimum cardinality subset of edges whose weights can be modified such that the resulting graph is its own metric completion. This problem was shown to be APX-hard, and moreover an $O(OPT^{1/3})$-approximation was shown, where $OPT$ is the size of the optimal solution. In this paper we introduce the Generalized Metric Violation Distance (GMVD) problem, where the goal is the same, but the input graph is no longer required to be complete. For GMVD we prove stronger hardness results, and provide a significantly faster approximation algorithm with an improved approximation guarantee. In particular, we give an approximation-preserving reduction from the well studied MultiCut problem, which is hard to approximate within any constant factor assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. Our approximation factor depends on deficit values, which for a given cycle is the largest single edge weight minus the sum of the weights of all its other edges. Note that no cycle has positive deficit in a metric complete graph. We give an $O(c \log n)$-approximation algorithm for \gmvd, where $c$ is the number of distinct positive cycle deficit values in the input graph.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chenglin Fan, Benjamin Raichel, Gregory Van Buskirk. 2018-07-21. Metric Violation Distance: Revisited and Extended. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.08078

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG