SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1808.08772

Solving Partition Problems Almost Always Requires Pushing Many Vertices Around

Abstract

A fundamental graph problem is to recognize whether the vertex set of a graph $G$ can be bipartitioned into sets $A$ and $B$ such that $G[A]$ and $G[B]$ satisfy properties $\Pi_A$ and $\Pi_B$, respectively. This so-called $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition problem generalizes amongst others the recognition of $3$-colorable, bipartite, split, and monopolar graphs. In this paper, we study whether certain fixed-parameter tractable $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition problems admit polynomial kernels. In our study, we focus on the first level above triviality, where $\Pi_A$ is the set of $P_3$-free graphs (disjoint unions of cliques, or cluster graphs), the parameter is the number of clusters in the cluster graph $G[A]$, and $\Pi_B$ is characterized by a set $\mathcal{H}$ of connected forbidden induced subgraphs. We prove that, under the assumption that NP is not a subset of coNP/poly, \textsc{$(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition} admits a polynomial kernel if and only if $\mathcal{H}$ contains a graph with at most $2$ vertices. In both the kernelization and the lower bound results, we exploit the properties of a pushing process, which is an algorithmic technique used recently by Heggerness et al. and by Kanj et al. to obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for many cases of $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition, as well as several other problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Iyad Kanj, Christian Komusiewicz, Manuel Sorge, Erik Jan van Leeuwen. 2018-08-27. Solving Partition Problems Almost Always Requires Pushing Many Vertices Around. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.esa.2018.51

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC