Multiple Scaled Contaminated Normal Distribution and Its Application in Clustering

Antonio Punzo; Cristina Tortora

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1810.08918

Multiple Scaled Contaminated Normal Distribution and Its Application in Clustering

Antonio Punzo·Cristina Tortora

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The multivariate contaminated normal (MCN) distribution represents a simple heavy-tailed generalization of the multivariate normal (MN) distribution to model elliptical contoured scatters in the presence of mild outliers, referred to as "bad" points. The MCN can also automatically detect bad points. The price of these advantages is two additional parameters, both with specific and useful interpretations: proportion of good observations and degree of contamination. However, points may be bad in some dimensions but good in others. The use of an overall proportion of good observations and of an overall degree of contamination is limiting. To overcome this limitation, we propose a multiple scaled contaminated normal (MSCN) distribution with a proportion of good observations and a degree of contamination for each dimension. Once the model is fitted, each observation has a posterior probability of being good with respect to each dimension. Thanks to this probability, we have a method for simultaneous directional robust estimation of the parameters of the MN distribution based on down-weighting and for the automatic directional detection of bad points by means of maximum a posteriori probabilities. The term "directional" is added to specify that the method works separately for each dimension. Mixtures of MSCN distributions are also proposed as an application of the proposed model for robust clustering. An extension of the EM algorithm is used for parameter estimation based on the maximum likelihood approach. Real and simulated data are used to show the usefulness of our mixture with respect to well-established mixtures of symmetric distributions with heavy tails.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME stat.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Antonio Punzo, Cristina Tortora. 2018-10-21. Multiple Scaled Contaminated Normal Distribution and Its Application in Clustering. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08918

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗