SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1901.04454

Posterior inference unchained with EL_2O

Abstract

Statistical inference of analytically non-tractable posteriors is a difficult problem because of marginalization of correlated variables and stochastic methods such as MCMC and VI are commonly used. We argue that stochastic KL divergence minimization used by MCMC and VI is noisy, and we propose instead EL_2O, expectation optimization of L_2 distance squared between the approximate log posterior q and the un-normalized log posterior of p. When sampling from q the solutions agree with stochastic KL divergence minimization based VI in the large sample limit, however EL_2O method is free of sampling noise, has better optimization properties, and requires only as many sample evaluations as the number of parameters we are optimizing if q covers p. As a consequence, increasing the expressivity of q improves both the quality of results and the convergence rate, allowing EL_2O to approach exact inference. Use of automatic differentiation methods enables us to develop Hessian, gradient and gradient free versions of the method, which can determine M(M+2)/2+1, M+1 and 1 parameter(s) of q with a single sample, respectively. EL_2O provides a reliable estimate of the quality of the approximating posterior, and converges rapidly on full rank gaussian approximation for q and extensions beyond it, such as nonlinear transformations and gaussian mixtures. These can handle general posteriors, while still allowing fast analytic marginalizations. We test it on several examples, including a realistic 13 dimensional galaxy clustering analysis, showing that it is several orders of magnitude faster than MCMC, while giving smooth and accurate non-gaussian posteriors, often requiring a few to a few dozen of iterations only.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Uros Seljak, Byeonghee Yu. 2019-01-14. Posterior inference unchained with EL_2O. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04454

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Hilbert-Valued Functional Decomposition Framework for Explaining Time-Dependent Outputs

Feature-based explanations quantify features' influence on model predictions, but are primarily designed for scalar outputs. In many applications, however, outputs are functional or multivariate, such as time-dependent trajectories in demand forecasting. Consequently, existing approaches typically explain each output location independently, ignoring dependencies across the output components. We address this limitation by developing a unified framework for feature-based explanations of time-dependent outputs. Specifically, we generalize functional decomposition to Hilbert-valued prediction functions and extend an existing feature-based explanation framework to this setting. Our framework introduces kernel-based output representations that enable time-dependency-aware explanations at multiple levels of temporal granularity, including time-specific, time-resolved, and time-aggregated, while providing a unified view in which existing methods arise as special cases. We validate our framework on synthetic and real-world data, including intraday financial market volatility prediction and energy demand forecasting.

stat.ML

Risk-Averse Decision Making with Multi-Level Reliability Guarantees

Many applications in engineering, including wireless broadcasting, require designs that provide performance certificates at different target outage levels. This paper studies the problem of maximizing the weighted average of such certificates in the presence of uncertainty about the true system state. The problem is shown to be equivalent to an optimization over nested prediction sets, connecting to the literature on conformal prediction and extending prior art on single-level risk-averse decision making. Furthermore, we derive a dual formulation that decouples optimization across input values. Numerical experiments on a diversity-based wireless transmission system illustrate the cost of enforcing multi-level certificates with a single shared policy and trace the Pareto trade-off between multiple reliability levels.

stat.ML

A distribution-free certification framework for trustworthy crash-severity prediction

Crash-severity models inform screening, dispatch and site prioritization, yet are deployed without a finite-sample statement of what one prediction means. Off-the-shelf guarantees fail here, because the features that make crash severity distinctive defeat them: the KABCO outcome is ordinal, the recorded label is a field assessment agreeing with medical severity about half the time, erring in a structured way, and deployment crosses jurisdictions and years calibration never saw. We develop a certification layer that wraps any severity model unmodified, with distribution-free guarantees using this structure: contiguous ordinal sets that read as "B or worse"; per-class validity for any pre-declared partition, with an oracle efficiency characterization; transfer of coverage to unobserved true severity through a declared reporting band, with a worst-case sharpness result; a one-sided certificate under deployment shift; and severity-weighted risk control. The guarantees compose with an attributable slack budget. The same analysis bounds what certification can achieve. A certified set's informativeness is governed by a functional of the true law that no base model can evade and that cannot be lower-bounded distribution-free; given a declared misreporting channel identified from record-linkage data, a nonvacuous lower bound on that floor becomes computable. On 5.2 million Texas records across seven base models spanning four decades, the layer attaches identical validity and certifies, on the vulnerable road users, a model-independent floor on set width that no base model beats, separating it from a remainder that stays bounded but distribution-free unidentifiable. The framework is released as an open-source package with theorem-level tests.

stat.ML