SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1903.08280

Preprocessing Ambiguous Imprecise Points

Abstract

Let ${R} = \{R_1, R_2, ..., R_n\}$ be a set of regions and let $ X = \{x_1, x_2, ..., x_n\}$ be an (unknown) point set with $x_i \in R_i$. Region $R_i$ represents the uncertainty region of $x_i$. We consider the following question: how fast can we establish order if we are allowed to preprocess the regions in $R$? The preprocessing model of uncertainty uses two consecutive phases: a preprocessing phase which has access only to ${R}$ followed by a reconstruction phase during which a desired structure on $X$ is computed. Recent results in this model parametrize the reconstruction time by the ply of ${R}$, which is the maximum overlap between the regions in ${R}$. We introduce the ambiguity $A({R})$ as a more fine-grained measure of the degree of overlap in ${R}$. We show how to preprocess a set of $d$-dimensional disks in $O(n \log n)$ time such that we can sort $X$ (if $d=1$) and reconstruct a quadtree on $X$ (if $d\geq 1$ but constant) in $O(A({R}))$ time. If $A({R})$ is sub-linear, then reporting the result dominates the running time of the reconstruction phase. However, we can still return a suitable data structure representing the result in $O(A({R}))$ time. In one dimension, ${R}$ is a set of intervals and the ambiguity is linked to interval entropy, which in turn relates to the well-studied problem of sorting under partial information. The number of comparisons necessary to find the linear order underlying a poset $P$ is lower-bounded by the graph entropy of $P$. We show that if $P$ is an interval order, then the ambiguity provides a constant-factor approximation of the graph entropy. This gives a lower bound of $\Omega(A({R}))$ in all dimensions for the reconstruction phase (sorting or any proximity structure), independent of any preprocessing; hence our result is tight.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ivor van der Hoog, Irina Kostitsyna, Maarten Löffler, Bettina Speckmann. 2019-03-19. Preprocessing Ambiguous Imprecise Points. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08280

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG