A Direct $\tilde{O}(1/\epsilon)$ Iteration Parallel Algorithm for Optimal Transport

Arun Jambulapati; Aaron Sidford; Kevin Tian

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1906.00618

A Direct $\tilde{O}(1/\epsilon)$ Iteration Parallel Algorithm for Optimal Transport

Arun Jambulapati·Aaron Sidford·Kevin Tian

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Optimal transportation, or computing the Wasserstein or ``earth mover's'' distance between two distributions, is a fundamental primitive which arises in many learning and statistical settings. We give an algorithm which solves this problem to additive $\epsilon$ with $\tilde{O}(1/\epsilon)$ parallel depth, and $\tilde{O}\left(n^2/\epsilon\right)$ work. Barring a breakthrough on a long-standing algorithmic open problem, this is optimal for first-order methods. Blanchet et. al. '18, Quanrud '19 obtained similar runtimes through reductions to positive linear programming and matrix scaling. However, these reduction-based algorithms use complicated subroutines which may be deemed impractical due to requiring solvers for second-order iterations (matrix scaling) or non-parallelizability (positive LP). The fastest practical algorithms run in time $\tilde{O}(\min(n^2 / \epsilon^2, n^{2.5} / \epsilon))$ (Dvurechensky et. al. '18, Lin et. al. '19). We bridge this gap by providing a parallel, first-order, $\tilde{O}(1/\epsilon)$ iteration algorithm without worse dependence on dimension, and provide preliminary experimental evidence that our algorithm may enjoy improved practical performance. We obtain this runtime via a primal-dual extragradient method, motivated by recent theoretical improvements to maximum flow (Sherman '17).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.LG math.OC stat.CO stat.ML

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Arun Jambulapati, Aaron Sidford, Kevin Tian. 2019-06-03. A Direct $\tilde{O}(1/\epsilon)$ Iteration Parallel Algorithm for Optimal Transport. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00618

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗