Correct estimate of the probability of false detection of the matched filter in weak-signal detection problems. III (Peak distribution method versus the Gumbel distribution method)

R. Vio; P. Andreani; A. Biggs; N. Hayatsu

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834854

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1907.01465

Correct estimate of the probability of false detection of the matched filter in weak-signal detection problems. III (Peak distribution method versus the Gumbel distribution method)

R. Vio·P. Andreani·A. Biggs·N. Hayatsu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The matched filter (MF) represents one of the main tools to detect signals from known sources embedded in the noise. In the Gaussian case the noise is assumed to be the realization of a Gaussian random field (GRF). The most important property of the MF, the maximization of the probability of detection subject to a constant probability of false detection or false alarm (PFA), makes it one of the most popular techniques. However, the MF technique relies upon the a priori knowledge of the number and the position of the searched signals in the GRF which usually are not available. A typical way out is to assume that the position of a signal coincides with one of the peaks in the matched filtered data. A detection is claimed when the probability that a given peak is due only to the noise (i.e. the PFA) is smaller than a prefixed threshold. In this case the probability density function (PDF) of the amplitudes has to be used for the computation of the PFA, which is different from the Gaussian. Moreover, the probability that a detection is false depends on the number of peaks present in the filtered GRF, the greater the number of peaks in a GRF, the higher the probability of peaks due to the noise that exceed the detection threshold. If not taken into account, the PFA can be severely underestimated. Many solutions proposed to this problem are non-parametric hence not able to exploit all the available information. This limitation has been overcome by means of two efficient parametric approaches, one based on the PDF of the peak amplitudes of a smooth and isotropic GRF whereas the other uses the Gumbel distribution (the asymptotic PDF of the corresponding extreme). Simulations and ALMA maps show that, although the two methods produce almost identical results, the first is more flexible and allows us to check the reliability of the detection procedure.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

R. Vio, P. Andreani, A. Biggs, N. Hayatsu. 2019-07-02. Correct estimate of the probability of false detection of the matched filter in weak-signal detection problems. III (Peak distribution method versus the Gumbel distribution method). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%2F201834854

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The EDD Radio Astronomy Backend Framework

Modern digital radio astronomy receivers produce increasingly wide-bandwidth, high bit-rate data streams that necessitate the development of flexible, scalable, and maintainable backend processing and recording systems. Historically, such backend instrumentation has been tightly coupled to telescope observing modes, limiting reuse between observatories and science cases. We present the Effelsberg Direct Digitisation (EDD) backend framework, a software-defined architecture for constructing real-time radio astronomy backends on commodity off-the-shelf computing infrastructure. We describe its design, implementation, supported observing modes, and operational deployments. EDD separates a common core framework from plugin-provided observing capabilities. The core provides orchestration, telescope interfaces, pipeline lifecycle management, monitoring, and deployment tooling, while plugins implement processing pipelines for specific observing modes. The framework is designed to support both single-dish and interferometric instruments through site-specific configuration and plugin selection. EDD currently supports spectroscopy and spectropolarimetry, pulsar timing and searching, baseband recording, very long baseline interferometry, correlation, and beamforming. Operational deployments include the Effelsberg 100-m telescope, the SKA-MPI prototype dish, the Thai National Radio Telescope, and the ARGOS interferometric prototype array. By separating common services, observing-mode plugins, and site-specific configuration, it allows backend capabilities to be deployed across heterogeneous telescope environments and provides a community resource for broadband radio astronomy instrumentation.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2026

Bayesian Superiority in On/Off analysis

We present a detailed comparison of Bayesian criteria with three non-informative priors - flat, Jeffreys, and scale-invariant - for testing a signal against an unknown background and compare them with the classical frequentist Li-Ma approach in the On/Off problem. We perform Monte Carlo simulations for various background levels and evaluate the Li-Ma and Bayesian criteria by their Type I error rates. We then simulate a nonzero signal and compare the criteria in terms of Type II error rates. We find that the Bayesian criterion with the Jeffreys prior yields lower Type I and Type II error rates than the Li-Ma criterion. In addition, we show that the Bayesian criteria are more robust than the Li-Ma criterion when the background distribution is overdispersed relative to the Poisson distribution.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2026

An RFSoC-based Backend and Timing System for the Balloon-borne Very Long Baseline Interferometry Experiment

We present the design and performance characterization of the digital backend and precision-timing system for the Balloon-borne Very Long Baseline Interferometry Experiment (BVEX), a pathfinder for high-frequency stratospheric VLBI at 22 GHz. The backend uses one of the four 14-bit analog-to-digital converter inputs on an AMD-Xilinx RFSoC 4x2. Although the converters support sampling rates up to 5 GSPS, the flight configuration digitizes the 2-4 GHz intermediate frequency at 4.096 GSPS. CASPER firmware provides both a high-resolution spectrometer for pointing and receiver verification, and a VLBI acquisition chain with two-bit requantization that records at a rate of about 8.2 Gbps. The timestamped data packets are sent over 100 Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) to a 16 TB NVMe array in a storage computer that draws approximately 70-80 W. The timing chain uses a Rakon oven-controlled crystal oscillator as a timing reference while a time-interval counter measures its drift relative to a GPS reference with approximately 60 ps resolution. This is the first deployment of an RFSoC-based VLBI backend and precision-timing system on a stratospheric balloon. Ground tests validated the backend, spectrometer, and timing chain. The August 2025 CSA STRATOS flight ended before reaching the target float altitude because of a balloon failure, and as a result no science observations were obtained. For the planned 2027 reflight, we are developing a conduction-cooled data storage computer with 24 TB of NVMe capacity and a direct data path from the 100 GbE interface to the NVMe array.

astro-ph.IM↗